ADANIPOWERPower
Adani Power Limited
Current Priceโ‚น208.97(-0.26%)
Market Capโ‚น4,02,992 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated29 Jul 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Composite forensic risk score based on earnings quality, cash flow, and balance sheet signals. Lower is better.
10/ 100
Risk Rating:Stable
๐ŸŸขQoQ Trend:-5 pts (Risk Decreased)
Business๐ŸŸข Stable
Primary DriverRelative Growth Weakness
Valuationsโœ— Demanding
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%
Market Structureโœ“ Strong
Stage 243 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment
๐ŸŸ  MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.
Business10/100StableQoQ Delta: -5 ptsRisk Trend: Improving
ValuationDemandingImplied 60.6% vs 10.4% ObservedValuation Risk: High
Market StructureStage 2 ยท Stage 2 โ€” AdvancingRegime Days: 43A/D Flow: Strong Distribution (-1.16ฯƒ)7D Ago Flow: โ€”

What Changed? THIS QUARTER

  • โœ“Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • โœ—Profitability margins remain stressed
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ“Market structure is strong
  • โ—‹Institutional flow regime is Strong Distribution (-1.16ฯƒ)
  • โœ—Share price is down -6.6% this quarter (from โ‚น223.77 on 30 Jun to โ‚น208.97)

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH90/100
VALUATIONS SURVIVAL (CONSERVATISM)42/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION21/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Low
Balanced
High
Strong
Weak
๐Ÿ”ด

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น208.97(-0.26%)
1M Divergence-7.71%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-3.68%-0.34%-3.33%
1 Month-7.96%-0.26%-7.71%
6 Months+54.36%+7.95%+46.4%
1 Year+76.33%-8.03%+84.36%
2 Year+45.85%-10.09%+55.93%
3 Year+304.12%+47.74%+256.38%
๐Ÿ’ก

How to Read Business Analysis

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score10 / 100Riskier than 10.0% of Sector Peers
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ ยท ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Risk Acceleration+0 Qtrs
Escalation Prob.5%โœ… NEUTRAL
Interpretation

Financial profile is stable with manageable leverage. Pressure is receding in project execution and margins. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition
Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.

Earnings Quality
+6.8 pts
Competitive Position
+2.1 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+1.1 pts
Final Composite Risk10 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 โ†’ 10 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
๐ŸŸข Improving
Primary Deterioration Drivers
  • Margin Compression
  • Relative Growth Weakness
  • Operating Leverage Stress
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Operating cash flow
  • Debt growth

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Competitive Position
โ– Relative Growth Weakness
HIGHDecaying
Earning Quality
โ– Margin Compression
HIGHDecaying
โ– Profit Collapse
HIGHDecaying

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Margin CompressionHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Margin Compression is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. We advise close monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (6)

CriticalHigh
Margin Compression
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 1 Years
Impact Weight15/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ1 FY2026
Operating margin declined by 2.9 bps YoY for two consecutive quarters.

"Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed."

Relative Growth Weakness
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 3 Years
Impact Weight12/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ4 FY2026
Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (11.0%).

"Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding."

Operating Leverage Stress
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 4 Years
Impact Weight10/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ3 FY2026
Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

"Debt servicing metrics have improved recently. The company is actively deleveraging."

Profit Collapse
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtrs
Impact Weight8/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ1 FY2025
ADANIPOWER: Net Profit collapsed by 55.3% from FY2024 Q1 to FY2025 Q1.

"Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding."

๐ŸŸก HighCash Conversion Deficit
FY2025
Show Analysis
๐ŸŸก HighRevenue-Debt Divergence
FY2026
Show Analysis
Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Escalation RiskLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Power (n=29 peers)

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(6.6)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘66th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(9.3)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ93th %ile
Competitive Position(8.6)Goodโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘86th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile

Deterioration Timeline

2026

Relative Growth Weakness

2026

Relative Growth Weakness

2026

Operating Leverage Stress

2026

Relative Growth Weakness

2026

Operating Leverage Stress

2026

Margin Compression

2026

Operating Leverage Stress

2026

Revenue-Debt Divergence

2025

Operating Leverage Stress

2025

Cash Conversion Deficit

2025

Revenue-Debt Divergence

2024

Cash Conversion Deficit

Key Financials (INR Cr)

Revenue Trend
Growingโ†‘
Profitability
Improvingโ†‘
Cash Generation
Improvingโ†‘
Debt Trend
Risingโ†‘
PeriodRevenueEBITDANet ProfitCFODebt
FY202657,86523,43112,97120,51453,556
FY202558,90624,00812,75021,50138,335
FY202460,28128,11120,82914,17034,457
FY202343,04114,31210,7278,43142,252
FY202231,68613,7894,91210,233-
3Y Growth Snapshot+34%+64%+21%+143%+27%
Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

MARKET EXPECTATION ENGINE
DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS
๐Ÿ’ก

How to read this

We calculate the future growth rate the market is currently expecting and compare it to the company's historical delivery. A higher required growth target indicates more demanding market expectations and elevated expectation risk.

Sentinel InsightsThe market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR60.6%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR10.4%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+50.2%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk Score89/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (63%)
Historical (10.4%)
Market (60.6%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing ADANIPOWER for 60.6% implied revenue growth versus 10.4% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Audit
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
10.4% CAGR
โœ“ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
29.7% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
32.8% Conv
โœ— Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
โœ— Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
25/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“High implied growth
โœ“Expensive valuation regime
โœ“Weak profitability support
โœ“Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-0.69% (Weak)
Sector Premium+57% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)60.6%10.4%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)28.1%29.7%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion-15.8%32.8%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

๐Ÿ’ก

How to read Market Structure

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
ADVANCINGGROWTH CYCLE
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
77%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the constructive trend as momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
โœ“RS continues to lead the market
โœ“Institutional flow has improved
โœ—Momentum remains negative
Summary
๐ŸŸ Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Weinstein Stage Analysis

S1
Accumulation
S2
Advancing
S3
Distribution
S4
Declining
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
77%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions43 Sessions
Transition Probability95% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.1232ฯƒ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+5.5009%
Participation & Volume
Avg Turnover (200D)โ‚น602.3 Cr
Liquidity RatingLiquid
ParticipationNeutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.0463ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#1301 of 2792Top 46.60% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
-1.16ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
ADANIPOWER

Market Structure Analysis

Explore how each market indicator contributes to the current stage classification.

No market structure history available.
Methodology & Disclaimer

These analytics are derived from quantitative analysis of historical price, volume, and market participation data and are intended solely for informational and research purposes. They do not constitute investment advice, recommendations, or guarantees of future performance.