ASHOKLEYCapital Goods
Ashok Leyland Limited
Current Priceโ‚น158.09(+0.08%)
Market Capโ‚น92,860 Cr
Analysis WindowQ4 FY26
Last Updated29 Jul 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Composite forensic risk score based on earnings quality, cash flow, and balance sheet signals. Lower is better.
15/ 100
Risk Rating:Stable
๐ŸŸขQoQ Trend:-3 pts (Risk Decreased)
Business๐ŸŸข Stable
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuationsโ—‹ Balanced
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%
Market Structureโœ— Weak
Stage 41 sessions

High-quality business currently experiencing weak market structure. Monitor for trend reversal. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment
๐Ÿ”ด DivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.
Business15/100StableQoQ Delta: -3 ptsRisk Trend: Improving
ValuationBalancedImplied 31.9% vs 10.9% ObservedValuation Risk: Medium
Market StructureStage 4 ยท Stage 4 โ€” DecliningRegime Days: 1A/D Flow: Neutral (+0.03ฯƒ)7D Ago Flow: โ€”

What Changed? THIS QUARTER

  • โœ“Risk score improved (QoQ change: -3 pts)
  • โœ—Profitability margins remain stressed
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ—Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • โ—‹Institutional flow regime is Neutral (0.03ฯƒ)
  • โœ“Share price is up +0.2% this quarter (from โ‚น157.7 on 30 Jun to โ‚น158.09)

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH85/100
VALUATIONS SURVIVAL (CONSERVATISM)47/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION51/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Low
Balanced
High
Strong
Weak
๐ŸŸก

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น158.09(+0.08%)
1M Divergence-0.79%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+3.67%0%+3.67%
1 Month+0.46%+1.25%-0.79%
6 Months-18.25%+17.09%-35.34%
1 Year+31.28%+4.92%+26.37%
2 Year+27.53%+8.57%+18.96%
3 Year+87.6%+81.31%+6.29%
๐Ÿ’ก

How to Read Business Analysis

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score15 / 100Riskier than 44.8% of Sector Peers
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend-3 QoQ ยท ImprovingRisk score improved (-3 pts)
Risk Acceleration+0 Qtrs
Escalation Prob.5%โœ… NEUTRAL
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in profitability and earnings quality. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition
Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.

Earnings Quality
+15.0 pts
Final Composite Risk15 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 6 โ†’ 15 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
โš  Watch
Primary Deterioration Drivers
  • Inventory Stress
  • Industrial Margin Stress
  • Relative Growth Weakness
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Operating cash flow
  • Inventory turnover

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
โ– Industrial Margin Stress
HIGHPersistent
โ– Cash Conversion Deficit
HIGHPersistent
Governance Signals
โ– Negative FCF Streak
HIGHAccelerating

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Inventory StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (8)

CriticalHigh
Low Interest Coverage
๐Ÿ’ง Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 9 Qtrs
Impact Weight8/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ3 FY2026
ASHOKLEY: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.00x in FY2026 Q3 (Threshold: 2.5x).

"The ability to cover interest is strengthening as earnings improve or debt is retired."

Inventory Stress
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 1 Years
Impact Weight15/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ2 FY2025
Inventory growth (14.4%) significantly outpaced revenue growth (-1.8%).

"Inventory overhang is clearing. Stock levels are normalizing as sales momentum returns."

Industrial Margin Stress
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 4 Years
Impact Weight12/15
MomentumPersistent
Last SignalQ4 FY2026
ASHOKLEY: Raw material costs consumed an additional 5.5% of revenue YoY.

"Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue."

Relative Growth Weakness
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 3 Years
Impact Weight12/15
MomentumPersistent
Last SignalQ1 FY2026
Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (12.8%).

"Early signs of earnings quality decay. Profitability is being driven by non-core items."

๐ŸŸก HighOperating Leverage Stress
Q4 FY2026
Show Analysis
๐ŸŸก HighWorking Capital Expansion
Q2 FY2024
Show Analysis
๐ŸŸก HighNegative FCF Streak
FY2026
Show Analysis
๐ŸŸก HighCash Conversion Deficit
FY2026
Show Analysis
Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Escalation RiskLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Capital Goods (n=262 peers)

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(0)Weakโ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘0th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile

Deterioration Timeline

2026

Operating Leverage Stress

2026

Industrial Margin Stress

2026

Operating Leverage Stress

2026

Industrial Margin Stress

2026

Industrial Margin Stress

2026

Industrial Margin Stress

2026

Relative Growth Weakness

2026

Cash Conversion Deficit

2026

Negative FCF Streak

2025

Relative Growth Weakness

2025

Relative Growth Weakness

2025

Inventory Stress

2025

Negative FCF Streak

2025

Cash Conversion Deficit

2024

Working Capital Expansion

2024

Cash Conversion Deficit

Key Financials (INR Cr)

Revenue Trend
Growingโ†‘
Profitability
Improvingโ†‘
Cash Generation
Weakeningโ†“
Debt Trend
Risingโ†‘
PeriodRevenueEBITDANet ProfitCFODebt
FY202656,94710,9453,721-4,89563,936
FY202548,8949,5823,38312849,962
FY202445,9317,9992,696-6,25840,802
FY202341,7835,2521,362-4,49931,161
FY202226,3242,528-2852,845-
3Y Growth Snapshot+36%+108%+173%-9%+105%
Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

MARKET EXPECTATION ENGINE
BALANCED EXPECTATIONS
๐Ÿ’ก

How to read this

We calculate the future growth rate the market is currently expecting and compare it to the company's historical delivery. A higher required growth target indicates more demanding market expectations and elevated expectation risk.

Sentinel InsightsThe market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR31.9%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR10.9%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+21.0%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk Score57/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (34%)
Historical (10.9%)
Market (31.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing ASHOKLEY for 31.9% implied revenue growth versus 10.9% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Audit
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
10.9% CAGR
โœ“ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
9.3% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-117.8% Conv
โœ— Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
โœ— Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
25/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“High implied growth
โœ“Weak profitability support
โœ“Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-8.44% (Weak)
Sector Premium-37% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)31.9%10.9%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)9.6%9.3%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion-142.9%-117.8%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

๐Ÿ’ก

How to read Market Structure

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DECLININGBEAR CYCLE
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
5%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
โœ—RS continues to lag the market
โœ“Institutional flow has improved
โœ—Momentum remains negative
Summary
๐Ÿ”ดDiverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Weinstein Stage Analysis

S1
Accumulation
S2
Advancing
S3
Distribution
S4
Declining
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
5%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions1 Sessions
Transition Probability1% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.9242ฯƒ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-0.1960%
Participation & Volume
Avg Turnover (200D)โ‚น339.7 Cr
Liquidity RatingLiquid
ParticipationNeutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.2654ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#1928 of 2792Bottom 30.95% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
+0.03ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
ASHOKLEY

Market Structure Analysis

Explore how each market indicator contributes to the current stage classification.

No market structure history available.
Methodology & Disclaimer

These analytics are derived from quantitative analysis of historical price, volume, and market participation data and are intended solely for informational and research purposes. They do not constitute investment advice, recommendations, or guarantees of future performance.