IDFCFIRSTB
NSE↗BSE↗Large Cap
IDFC First Bank Limited
Financial Services›Banks›Private Sector Bank
Current Price₹73.53(+3.04%)
Market Cap₹63,333 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
20/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)78th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverNIM Compression
Valuations○ Balanced
Implied ROE Gap-65.1%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 194 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

SENTINEL REVIEW

IDFC First Bank Limited (IDFCFIRSTB)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
24 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q2 FY2027, IDFC First Bank Limited exhibits a robust operational inflection, with reported revenue growing 20.3% YoY to ₹14,228.5 Cr and net profit moving to ₹1,049.2 Cr compared with ₹347.8 Cr in the prior year. This trajectory is supported by significant margin expansion, as EBITDA margins rose to 50.2% from 44.4% YoY, sustaining the earnings recovery established in the preceding quarter. This operational strength is anchored against the audited FY2026 balance sheet, where asset quality signals are normalizing with a GNPA ratio of 1.94% despite persistent NIM compression at 5.55%. While audited CFO contracted to ₹6,816.6 Cr, total debt has moderated to ₹36,632.6 Cr (D/E 0.95) and capital adequacy is strengthening through profit retention despite regulatory floor proximity, maintaining the company firmly within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗New risk trigger: NIM Compression (+8.8 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.63σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -9.7% this quarter (from ₹81.44 on 30 Sept to ₹73.53)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 1 active forensic warning flag for structural stress
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 11.0 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 9.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH80/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION34/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹73.53(+3.04%)
1M Divergence-4.48%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-2.04%-3.61%+1.57%
1 Month-8.72%-4.23%-4.48%
6 Months+5.59%-1.54%+7.13%
1 Year-7.16%+0.27%-7.43%
2 Year+9.89%+14.55%-4.65%
3 Year-14.27%+24.73%-39.01%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score20 / 100Riskier than 78% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in profitability and earnings quality. This suggests the risk profile is currently stabilizing. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+11.0 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+9.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk20 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has declined from 25 → 20 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWNIM Compression
+8.8 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■NIM Compression
MEDIUMPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ CAR Decay (Q4-FY26)✓ GNPA Spike (Q3-FY25)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■NIM CompressionMEDIUM
Forensic Analyst Insight

NIM Compression is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[F6]NIM Compression
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 6 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
NIMHigh Tier
5.55%ACCELERATION
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 5.79%
Empirical Trigger

IDFCFIRSTB: NIM decline is accelerating (27 bps drop vs prev -10 bps). [Growth Adjusted: 30%]

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin compression detected. Core interest income is being squeezed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[F10]CAR Decay
Solvency & LeverageQuarterlyActive for 9 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CAR RatioHigh Tier
0.00%Floor 11.5%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineRBI Floor: 11.5%
Empirical Trigger

IDFCFIRSTB: CAR (0.00%) at critical buffer level (v/s 11.5% floor). [Growth Adjusted: 20%]

Forensic Implication

Capital position is strengthening through fresh equity or higher profit retention.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for IDFC First Bank Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for IDFC First Bank Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceLow
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=255 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services(n=255 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 78th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
25/100
Base
25/100
36/100
31/100
36/100
31/100
42/100
41/100
33/100
30/100
25/100
20/100
LATEST
25➔20/100
▼5-point improvement(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by overall risk reduction across core indicators, partially offset by new NIM Compression (+8.8 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base25Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+8.81 flag
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-22.8 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+9 pts).
-13.8Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal20-5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
New Stress (1 Flag)
+8.8 pts
Earnings Quality·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Significant drop in Net Interest Margin.
Revenue YoY:+20.3%PAT YoY:+201.7%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Earnings Quality+11 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 11
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(5.6)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░56th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for IDFC First Bank Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
5.71%
Weakening↓
Asset Quality (Gross NPA)
1.61%
Improving↓
Provision Coverage (PCR)
118%
Weakening↓
Capital Adequacy (CRAR)
13.73%
Growing↑
Credit-Deposit Ratio
95.3%
Weakening↓
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
NII21,21619,29416,455(10,091)(7,465)n/m
growth % YoY+10.0%+17.3%————
Operating Profit (PPOP)——————
margin %——————
Net Profit1,6111,4902,9422,485132-13%
margin %7.6%7.7%17.9%-24.6%-1.8%—
Deposits294,312252,010200,570144,470105,540+27%
Advances280,391233,113194,592———
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Asset Quality & Liquidity

Statement Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Risk Signals
Elevated CD Ratio: 95.3% indicates tight structural liquidityCapital Buffer Alert: CRAR at 13.73% — approaching regulatory comfort floor
Gross NPA
1.61%
-26 bps
PCR
118.0%
Robust
CASA
—
CRAR
13.73%
Above Floor
CD Ratio
95.3%
Strain
NIM
5.71%
Asset Quality & Credit Risk
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross NPA4,5594,4343,718———————
Gross NPA (%)(%)1.61%1.87%1.88%———————
Provisions5,3795,5152,382———————
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)(%)118.00%124.40%64.10%———————
Net NPA (%)(%)-0.29%-0.46%0.67%———————
Credit Cost (% of Advances)(%)1.92%2.37%1.22%———————
Liquidity, Funding & Balance Sheet
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross Loan Book (Advances)2,80,3912,33,1131,94,592———————
Total Customer Deposits2,94,3122,52,0102,00,5701,44,4701,05,54088,53665,07970,35448,03940,098
CASA Ratio(%)——————————
Credit-to-Deposit (CD) Ratio(%)95.30%92.50%97.00%———————
Net Interest Income (NII)21,21619,29416,455———————
Net Interest Margin (NIM)(%)5.71%6.03%6.14%-4.69%-4.23%-5.50%-6.47%-5.96%-5.98%-5.81%
Capital Cushion & Solvency
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CRAR)(%)13.73%13.17%13.36%———————
Net Worth / Equity38,51430,83425,20425,84721,08217,90015,40418,20015,27414,677
Advances / Equity (Leverage)(x)7.3x7.6x7.7x———————
Forensic Divergences & Stress Signals
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Credit vs Deposit Growth (Δ)(pp)+3.5 pp-5.9 pp————————
GNPA vs Provision Growth (Δ)(pp)+5.3 pp-112.3 pp————————
Provision Burden on NII(%)25.40%28.60%14.50%———————

* RBI mandates min. CRAR 11.5% (Basel III). PCR >70% robust. CASA >40% = strong franchise. CD Ratio >85% = liquidity strain.

Industry Intelligence

Banking Sector KPIs
NIM
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current5.55%
QoQ Change-27 bps↓ Margin compression
YoY Change+5 bps↑ Margin expansion
Industry Median3.4%

Understanding Banking KPIs

NIM: Net Interest Margin. Measures operational lending spread relative to total assets. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Promoter holding down 37.45 pp across 12 quarters — requires monitoring
Promoter holding 0.00% (−37.45 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 62.08%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.56 ppDII +1.05 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -1.61 pp
FII+DII Net: +1.61 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (0.00%)
FII (36.66%)
DII (25.42%)
Govt (7.78%)
Public (30.13%)
Quarterly Progression
Government7.78%−0.01
2 unchanged — Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently improving. Recent structural triggers in earnings quality suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in operational margins and profitability metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹74, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 16.4% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 16.4%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE16.4%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE8.7%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap+7.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk64/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (8.7%)
Market (16.4%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing IDFCFIRSTB for a 16.4% Return on Equity (implied from its 1.55x P/B) versus its 8.7% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear demanding. Valuation risk is Medium.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
8.7% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium-66% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)16.4% (Implied)8.7% (Actual)Demanding
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)1.55x1.69xDiscount / Par
Return on Assets (ROA)0.64%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Weak ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
42%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the an early-stage base trend as momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
42%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions94 Sessions
Transition Probability19% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.7434σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityEarly Base
150 DMA Slope+1.6227%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹70 Cr48.97% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 31.3% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹224.5 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.1434σ
Universe Rank
#1171 of 2259Bottom 48.16% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.63σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
IDFCFIRSTB
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on IDFCFIRSTB & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →