LTIMindtree Limited
LTMStructural risk assessment following Q1-FY27 | 30 Jun 26 earnings.
Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26
0
Risk Score
Q1-FY27 | 30 Jun 26
0
Risk Score
🟡Risk remained stable
Flagium detected:
- ✓No active risk triggers detected
ℹ️ Executive Summary
LTIMindtree Limited posted steady top-line growth and bottom-line stability, demonstrating resilient execution in its core markets. While the underlying business remains fundamentally sound, the presence of 0 active risk warnings highlights minor operational or working capital inefficiencies to keep on the watch list.
🛡️ Sentinel Insight
"LTIMindtree Limited currently sits within Flagium's Stable category. However, recent periods have remained stable with minor operational friction. Steady top-line performance and clean accounting records help keep structural risk contained. Current deterioration appears cyclical rather than existential."
The Quarter at a Glance
| Metric | Q1-FY27 | 30 Jun 26 | Q1-FY26 | 30 Jun 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹11,863.4 Cr | ₹10,232.7 Cr | +15.9% |
| EBIT Margin | 16.68% | 16.87% | -19 bps |
| Net Profit (PAT) | ₹1,468.6 Cr | ₹1,254.6 Cr | +17.1% |
| Interest Expense | ₹76.3 Cr | ₹72.4 Cr | +5.4% |
← scroll to see all →
What Changed Beneath the Headlines?
Revenue Growth
Quarterly revenue changed by +15.9% YoY, reflecting demand and volume updates.
Net Profit Expansion
Profit after tax changed by +17.1% YoY, settling at ₹1,468.6 Cr.
Operating Margins
Operating margin declined by 19 bps YoY to 16.68%.
Flagium Risk Signals
Financial reports demonstrate robust disclosure levels with no forensic or accrual warnings.
Leadership team stability remains intact with no auditor qualifications or key departures.
What the financials are implicitly signaling
Flagium's structural analysis indicates:
- •Capacity utilization calibration is being monitored to align with slow volume intake.
- •Working capital conversion cycles require active support to sustain cash conversions.
Signals to Monitor Next Quarter
Raw material price movement and its impact on operating margins.
Working capital efficiency and cash flow conversions.
Domestic demand recovery and segment-wise volume growth.
Historical Quality Trend
Last 6 Quarters| Quarter | Risk Score | Trend | Current Risk Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY27 | 0 | → | 🟢 Stable |
| Q4 FY26 | 0 | → | 🟢 Stable |
| Q3 FY26 | 0 | → | 🟢 Stable |
| Q2 FY26 | 0 | → | 🟢 Stable |
| Q1 FY26 | 0 | ↓ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q4 FY25 | 5 | → | 🟢 Stable |
← scroll to see all →
What to do next
Explore LTM's full structural risk profile — 12Q score trajectory, pillar breakdown, flag history, and peer benchmarking.
View LTM profile →See how Diversified peers and the broader market are positioned. Identify sector-wide stress or rotation signals.
Open market monitor →Check how this Q1-FY27 | 30 Jun 26 result affects your portfolio's overall risk exposure and concentration.
Review your portfolio →Disclaimer
Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics platform. Analysis reports are compiled programmatically from public regulatory XBRL submissions (NSE/BSE). This evaluation does not constitute investment advice, financial planning, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment advisor before acting on any data presented.