C.E. Info Systems Limited
MAPMYINDIAStructural risk assessment following Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 earnings.
Q3-FY26 | 31 Dec 25
25
Risk Score
Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26
20
Risk Score
🟢Risk decreased by −5 points
Flagium detected:
- ✓Stabilization in key metrics
Persistent watch:
- Relative Growth Weakness
ℹ️ Executive Summary
C.E. Info Systems Limited registered a drop in both quarterly revenue and net profit, reflecting challenging industry-wide demand trends. A 'Watch' risk classification and 1 active flags indicate that operating headwinds are beginning to translate into structural pressure.
🛡️ Sentinel Insight
"C.E. Info Systems Limited currently sits within Flagium's Watch category. However, recent periods have introduced early signs of revenue growth headwinds. While profitability was defended, revenue contraction and triggers like 'Relative Growth Weakness' increased structural risk. Current deterioration appears cyclical rather than existential."
The Quarter at a Glance
| Metric | Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 | Q4-FY25 | 31 Mar 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹162.8 Cr | ₹166.8 Cr | -2.4% |
| EBIT Margin | 45.73% | 45.87% | -14 bps |
| Net Profit (PAT) | ₹50.9 Cr | ₹49.0 Cr | +3.9% |
| Interest Expense | ₹0.1 Cr | ₹0.7 Cr | -79.5% |
← scroll to see all →
What Changed Beneath the Headlines?
Revenue Contraction
Quarterly revenue changed by -2.4% YoY, reflecting demand and volume updates.
Net Profit Expansion
Profit after tax changed by +3.9% YoY, settling at ₹50.9 Cr.
Operating Margins
Operating margin declined by 14 bps YoY to 45.73%.
Flagium Risk Signals
Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (14.5%).
What the financials are implicitly signaling
Flagium's structural analysis indicates:
- •Demand visibility remains weak, leading to a focus on volume conservation over pricing power.
- •Productivity gains and offshore utilization are needed to offset wage inflation pressures.
- •Discretionary tech spend conversion remains slow in international geographies.
Signals to Monitor Next Quarter
TCV deal intake conversions into billable revenue.
Operating margin protection against wage hikes and employee costs.
Discretionary tech spend recovery in key markets.
Historical Quality Trend
Last 6 Quarters| Quarter | Risk Score | Trend | Current Risk Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 FY26 | 20 | ↓ | 🟠 Watch |
| Q3 FY26 | 25 | ↑ | 🟠 Watch |
| Q2 FY26 | 0 | → | 🟢 Stable |
| Q1 FY26 | 0 | ↓ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q4 FY25 | 5 | ↑ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q3 FY25 | 0 | → | 🟢 Stable |
← scroll to see all →
What to do next
Explore MAPMYINDIA's full structural risk profile — 12Q score trajectory, pillar breakdown, flag history, and peer benchmarking.
View MAPMYINDIA profile →See how Information Technology peers and the broader market are positioned. Identify sector-wide stress or rotation signals.
Open market monitor →Check how this Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 result affects your portfolio's overall risk exposure and concentration.
Review your portfolio →Disclaimer
Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics platform. Analysis reports are compiled programmatically from public regulatory XBRL submissions (NSE/BSE). This evaluation does not constitute investment advice, financial planning, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment advisor before acting on any data presented.