RAINChemicals
Rain Industries Limited
Current Priceโ‚น221.67(-1.29%)
Market Capโ‚น7,456 Cr
Analysis WindowQ4 FY26
Last Updated29 Jul 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Composite forensic risk score based on earnings quality, cash flow, and balance sheet signals. Lower is better.
15/ 100
Risk Rating:Stable
๐ŸŸขQoQ Trend:-5 pts (Risk Decreased)
Business๐ŸŸข Stable
Primary DriverProfit Collapse
Valuationsโ—‹ Balanced
Expectation Gap-80.3%
Market Structureโœ“ Strong
Stage 236 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment
๐ŸŸข ConfirmingMarket structure and positive capital flows confirm stable underlying fundamentals.
Business15/100StableQoQ Delta: -5 ptsRisk Trend: Improving
ValuationBalancedImplied 33.6% vs -4.2% ObservedValuation Risk: Medium
Market StructureStage 2 ยท Stage 2 โ€” AdvancingRegime Days: 36A/D Flow: Accumulation (+0.75ฯƒ)7D Ago Flow: โ€”

What Changed? THIS QUARTER

  • โœ“Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • โœ—Profitability margins remain stressed
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ“Market structure is strong
  • โœ“Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.75ฯƒ)
  • โœ“Share price is up +21.9% this quarter (from โ‚น181.82 on 30 Jun to โ‚น221.67)

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH85/100
VALUATIONS SURVIVAL (CONSERVATISM)44/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION69/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Low
Balanced
High
Strong
Weak
๐ŸŸก

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น221.67(-1.29%)
1M Divergence+18.74%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+2.32%0%+2.32%
1 Month+19.99%+1.25%+18.74%
6 Months+43.09%+17.09%+26%
1 Year+41.88%+4.92%+36.96%
2 Year+34.62%+8.57%+26.05%
3 Year+33.57%+81.31%-47.74%
๐Ÿ’ก

How to Read Business Analysis

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score15 / 100Riskier than 36.8% of Sector Peers
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ ยท ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Risk Acceleration+0 Qtrs
Escalation Prob.5%โœ… NEUTRAL
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in balance sheet stress. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition
Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.

Balance Sheet Stress
+7.7 pts
Stability Adjustment
+7.0 pts
Final Composite Risk15 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has declined from 21 โ†’ 15 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
๐ŸŸข Improving
Primary Deterioration Drivers
  • Inventory Stress
  • Relative Growth Weakness
  • Working Capital Expansion
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Inventory turnover
  • Working capital efficiency

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
โ– Profit Collapse
HIGHDecaying
โ– Inventory Stress
HIGHDecaying
Competitive Position
โ– Relative Growth Weakness
MEDIUMPersistent

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Inventory StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (5)

CriticalHigh
Low Interest Coverage
๐Ÿ’ง Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 11 Qtrs
Impact Weight8/15
MomentumPersistent
Last SignalQ4 FY2026
RAIN: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.07x in FY2026 Q4 (Threshold: 2.5x).

"Earnings buffer for interest payments is narrowing. Monitor for margin pressure."

Inventory Stress
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 1 Years
Impact Weight15/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ1 FY2024
Inventory growth (24.7%) significantly outpaced revenue growth (-70.2%).

"Inventory overhang is clearing. Stock levels are normalizing as sales momentum returns."

Relative Growth Weakness
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 3 Years
Impact Weight12/15
MomentumPersistent
Last SignalQ2 FY2026
Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (12.8%).

"Early signs of earnings quality decay. Profitability is being driven by non-core items."

Working Capital Expansion
๐Ÿ’ง Liquidity & CoverageAnnualActive for 2 Years
Impact Weight10/15
MomentumAccelerating
Last SignalQ3 FY2026
Working capital expansion detected: Receivable days increased by 1.1%.

"Early signs of working capital expansion. Receivable or inventory days are creeping up."

๐ŸŸก HighProfit Collapse
Q1 FY2025
Show Analysis
Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Escalation RiskLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Chemicals (n=126 peers)

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(6.2)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘62th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile

Deterioration Timeline

2026

Working Capital Expansion

2026

Relative Growth Weakness

2026

Relative Growth Weakness

2025

Relative Growth Weakness

2024

Inventory Stress

2024

Working Capital Expansion

Key Financials (INR Cr)

Revenue Trend
Decliningโ†“
Profitability
Weakeningโ†“
Cash Generation
Weakeningโ†“
Debt Trend
Stableโ†”
PeriodRevenueEBITDANet ProfitCFODebt
FY202517,0842,2761368979,824
FY202415,6201,520-4501,9438,494
FY202318,3201,112-7963,0638,690
FY202221,1163,6411,5771,0369,731
FY202114,7202,554694834-
3Y Growth Snapshot-19%-38%-91%-13%+1%
Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in balance sheet stress remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

MARKET EXPECTATION ENGINE
BALANCED EXPECTATIONS
๐Ÿ’ก

How to read this

We calculate the future growth rate the market is currently expecting and compare it to the company's historical delivery. A higher required growth target indicates more demanding market expectations and elevated expectation risk.

Sentinel InsightsThe market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth33.6%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery-4.2%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+37.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk Score45/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (36%)
Historical (-4.2%)
Market (33.6%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing RAIN for 33.6% long-term growth versus -4.2% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Audit
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-4.2% CAGR
โœ— Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
-0.5% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
101.0% Conv
โœ“ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
50/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“High implied growth
โœ“Weak historical delivery
โœ“Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support5.86% (Strong)
Sector Premium-57% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)33.6%-4.2%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)4.0%-0.5%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion61.2%101.0%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration and stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

๐Ÿ’ก

How to read Market Structure

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
ADVANCINGGROWTH CYCLE
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
81%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains constructive while momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
โœ“RS continues to lead the market
โœ—Institutional flow has deteriorated
โœ“Momentum remains positive
Summary
๐ŸŸขConfirming

Market structure and positive capital flows confirm stable underlying fundamentals.

Weinstein Stage Analysis

S1
Accumulation
S2
Advancing
S3
Distribution
S4
Declining
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
81%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions36 Sessions
Transition Probability97% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.3337ฯƒ Healthy
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+9.5052%
Participation & Volume
Avg Turnover (200D)โ‚น72.9 Cr
Liquidity RatingLow Liquidity
ParticipationHealthy

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.8410ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#241 of 2792Top 8.63% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
+0.75ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
RAIN

Market Structure Analysis

Explore how each market indicator contributes to the current stage classification.

No market structure history available.
Methodology & Disclaimer

These analytics are derived from quantitative analysis of historical price, volume, and market participation data and are intended solely for informational and research purposes. They do not constitute investment advice, recommendations, or guarantees of future performance.