SEPC
SEPCStructural risk assessment following Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 earnings.
Q3-FY26 | 31 Dec 25
1
Risk Score
Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26
6
Risk Score
ℹ️ Executive Summary
SEPC posted steady top-line growth and bottom-line stability, demonstrating resilient execution in its core markets. While the underlying business remains fundamentally sound, the presence of 1 active risk warnings highlights minor operational or working capital inefficiencies to keep on the watch list.
🛡️ Sentinel Insight
"SEPC currently sits within Flagium's Stable category. However, recent periods have introduced early signs of competitive and operating pressure. Despite positive top and bottom-line growth, triggers like 'Margin Compression' indicate underlying structural risk. Current deterioration appears cyclical rather than existential."
The Quarter at a Glance
| Metric | Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 | Q4-FY25 | 31 Mar 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹289.0 Cr | ₹126.1 Cr | +129.1% |
| EBIT Margin | 5.28% | 7.95% | -266 bps |
| Net Profit (PAT) | ₹13.7 Cr | ₹10.0 Cr | +37.0% |
| Interest Expense | ₹9.1 Cr | ₹12.3 Cr | -25.8% |
← scroll to see all →
What Changed Beneath the Headlines?
Revenue Growth
Quarterly revenue changed by +129.1% YoY, reflecting demand and volume updates.
Net Profit Expansion
Profit after tax changed by +37.0% YoY, settling at ₹13.7 Cr.
Operating Margins
Operating margin declined by 266 bps YoY to 5.28%.
Flagium Risk Signals
Operating margin declined by 2.7 bps YoY for two consecutive quarters.
What the financials are implicitly signaling
Flagium's structural analysis indicates:
- •Margin defense remains a priority as raw material costs or operating expense pressures rise.
- •Capacity utilization calibration is being monitored to align with slow volume intake.
- •Working capital conversion cycles require active support to sustain cash conversions.
Signals to Monitor Next Quarter
Raw material price movement and its impact on operating margins.
Working capital efficiency and cash flow conversions.
Domestic demand recovery and segment-wise volume growth.
Historical Quality Trend
Last 6 Quarters| Quarter | Risk Score | Trend | Current Risk Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 FY26 | 6 | ↑ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q3 FY26 | 1 | ↓ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q2 FY26 | 6 | ↑ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q1 FY26 | 1 | ↓ | 🟢 Stable |
| Q4 FY25 | 6 | → | 🟢 Stable |
| Q3 FY25 | 6 | → | 🟢 Stable |
← scroll to see all →
What to do next
Explore SEPC's full structural risk profile — 12Q score trajectory, pillar breakdown, flag history, and peer benchmarking.
View SEPC profile →See how Construction peers and the broader market are positioned. Identify sector-wide stress or rotation signals.
Open market monitor →Check how this Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 result affects your portfolio's overall risk exposure and concentration.
Review your portfolio →Disclaimer
Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics platform. Analysis reports are compiled programmatically from public regulatory XBRL submissions (NSE/BSE). This evaluation does not constitute investment advice, financial planning, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment advisor before acting on any data presented.