TCS
NSE↗BSE↗Large CapNIFTY 50
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Information Technology›IT - Software›Computers - Software & Consulting
Current Price₹2,460(-1.48%)
Market Cap₹8,90,050 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
14/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)28th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
StableQoQ Delta 0 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverRelative Growth Weakness
Valuations○ Balanced
Expectation Gap-8.4%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 110 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Tata Consultancy Services Limited (TCS)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
9 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q2 FY2027, Tata Consultancy Services Limited demonstrated resilient operational execution, reporting an 11.8% YoY revenue increase to ₹74,525 Cr and a 14.9% YoY growth in reported net profit to ₹13,934 Cr. EBITDA margins expanded by +0.4 pp YoY to 27.0%, reinforcing sequential margin improvement from Q1 FY2027 (26.3%) and signaling that historical operating leverage friction is steadily easing despite revenue growth trailing the sector median. This operational trajectory remains securely anchored by the audited FY2026 balance sheet, characterized by zero debt (D/E of 0.0) and high earnings quality with audited operating cash flows of ₹52,094 Cr (CFO/PAT of 1.05). With cash conversion normalizing and working capital needs anchored by trade receivables of ₹67,714 Cr comfortably absorbed by liquidity capacity, contained operational friction keeps the firm firmly within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: 0 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (1.70σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +20.0% this quarter (from ₹2,050.6 on 30 Sept to ₹2,460)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 1 active forensic warning flag for structural stress
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 14.0 ptsCompetitive Position
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH86/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)50/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION92/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹2,460(-1.48%)
1M Divergence+17.83%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-2.73%-1.9%-0.83%
1 Month+18.8%+0.97%+17.83%
6 Months+0.79%+9.46%-8.67%
1 Year-16.98%-7.18%-9.8%
2 Year-35.78%+3.58%-39.37%
3 Year-20.11%+82.69%-102.8%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score14 / 100Riskier than 28% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend0 QoQ · StableNo change in risk score
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure has stabilized in competitive position. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. No major change in risk trend.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Competitive Position
+14.0 pts
Final Composite Risk14 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 14 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
STABLE
Ongoing Risk Drivers
PERSISTENTRelative Growth Weakness
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Competitive Position
■Relative Growth Weakness
MEDIUMPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2025)✓ Operating Leverage Stress (Q3-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Competitive Position
■Relative Growth WeaknessMEDIUM
Forensic Analyst Insight

Relative growth underperformance indicates the company is losing sales momentum compared to sector peers, signaling potential competitive position pressure.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Trend DeteriorationQuarterlyActive for 6 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
11.8%Sec 15.0%
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineSec Median: 15.0%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (15.0%).

Forensic Implication

Early signs of earnings quality decay. Profitability is being driven by non-core items.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+4.5%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 25.6%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q3 FY2026
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Tata Consultancy Services Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Tata Consultancy Services Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Information Technology (n=109 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Information Technology(n=109 peers)
Median Risk: 14/100Position: 28th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
14/100
14/100
14/100
LATEST
14➔14/100
■0-point change(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk profile remained stable this quarter, with no new forensic alarms or critical threshold escalations detected.

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base14Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (0 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
0Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal140 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter0 Active Catalysts
✓
Pristine Baseline StabilityZero Forensic Anomalies or Alarms Fired in Q2 FY27
Clean State
New Alarms0
Net Delta0 pts
Risk ClassLow Risk
↳All 6 fundamental pillars operated within established safety parameters. No individual indicator transitions or severity shifts occurred during this period.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 14.1→Q2 FY27: 14.1
Earnings Quality—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(3)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░30th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (14).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Tata Consultancy Services Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
26.6%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
71 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
Zero Debt
Stable↔
Revenue Trend
₹2,71,423 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
Revenue271,423259,286245,315228,907195,772+6%
growth % YoY+4.7%+5.7%+7.2%+16.9%——
EBITDA72,27471,36967,76062,70857,075+5%
margin %26.6%27.5%27.6%27.4%29.2%—
Net Profit49,45448,79746,09942,30338,449+5%
margin %18.2%18.8%18.8%18.5%19.6%—
CFO52,09448,90844,33841,96539,949+7%
CFO / Net Profit1.05x1.00x0.96x0.99x1.04x—
Debt——————
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·8 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Inventory–Revenue Divergence: +33.4 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)
Cash Conversion Cycle
71 days+8d YoY
Receivables:+8d
Inventory:0d
Payables:0d
Net Working Capital
₹52,935 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 66 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-2,640 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-2,152 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -1.54% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
67,71459,04653,57749,954————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
29212828————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
14,80813,9099,98110,515————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
52,93545,15843,62439,467————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
19.5%17.4%17.8%17.2%————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
71d63d65d63d————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
91d83d80d80d————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
0d0d0d0d————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
20d20d15d17d————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+10.0%+4.5%+0.1%—————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+33.4%-30.7%-7.2%—————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+9.6%+3.3%-5.2%—————
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-2,640-1111,761338-1,500———
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-1.5%-0.1%1.2%0.2%————
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
74.4%74.9%70.4%73.7%77.3%———
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
19.5%12.3%14.3%10.8%————
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 71.77% (−0.64 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 22.58%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.05 ppDII +0.1 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.04 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.05 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (71.77%)
FII (9.01%)
DII (13.57%)
Public (5.65%)
Quarterly Progression
Total Pledged (% Eq)0.00%—
1 unchanged — Government 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in competitive position remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹2,460, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 8.0% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 8.0%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth8.0%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery5.1%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+2.9%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk55/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (5.1%)
Market (8.0%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing TCS for 8.0% long-term growth versus 5.1% historical delivery. Current expectations appear elevated, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
5.1% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
25.6% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
68.8% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support5.44% (Strong)
Sector Premium-20% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)8.0%5.1%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)25.4%25.6%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion66.3%68.8%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
51%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains an early-stage base while momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✗Institutional flow has deteriorated
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
51%
Readiness LabelModerate (Transition Potential Building)
Regime Sessions10 Sessions
Transition Probability18% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.1360σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStabilizing
150 DMA Slope-1.1929%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹237.8 Cr38.06% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +24.0% (21D vs 200D Avg)Above-Average Accumulation
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹1,035.4 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.3893σ
Universe Rank
#394 of 2259Top 17.44% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+1.70σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
TCS
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on TCS & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →