Vedanta Limited
Metals & Miningโ€บDiversified Metals
Current Priceโ‚น233.05(+3.3%)
Market Capโ‚น91,001 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
15/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean โ€ข 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)63rd Percentile ยท Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business๐ŸŸข Stable
Primary DriverCapex Efficiency Stress
Valuationsโœ“ Conservative
Expectation Gap+241.4%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structureโœ— Weak
Stage 4104 sessions

High-quality business currently experiencing weak market structure. Monitor for trend reversal. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment๐Ÿ”ดDivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Vedanta Limited (VEDL)โ€ขUpdated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

๐Ÿšจ Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Vedanta Limited is experiencing severe earnings quality strain, marked by a 134.05% YoY deterioration in reported net profit, swinging to a net loss of โ‚น9,150 Cr from a profit of โ‚น26,870 Cr in the prior year. Profitability is being eroded by persistent negative operating leverage and elevated capex, with operating cash flows contracting to โ‚น39,499 Cr despite revenue growth of only 3.9% YoY. This operating deterioration is compounded by structural inefficiencies: elevated capex of โ‚น10,255 Cr (25.3% of revenue) and inventory stress, with inventory rising 22.6% YoY against revenue growth of 3.9%. Against this liquidity strain, total debt expanded 8.43% to โ‚น26,995 Cr, pushing debt-to-equity to 0.39x and reducing interest coverage to 1.57x, entering Flagium's heightened surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • โœ—Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • โœ“Profitability margins pressure eased
  • โœ—New risk trigger: Universal Inventory Divergence (+9.6 pts)
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ—Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • โœ—Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.41ฯƒ)
  • โœ—Share price is down -10.0% this quarter (from โ‚น259 on 30 Sept to โ‚น233.05)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • ๐Ÿ”ดReview 2 active forensic warning flags for structural stress
  • ๐ŸŸ Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • ๐ŸŸขMaintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 8.7 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 6.3 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH85/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)48/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION40/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
๐ŸŸข
Profile: STRONG ร— ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น233.05(+3.3%)
1M Divergence-3.33%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-1.6%-1.46%-0.14%
1 Month-10.02%-6.69%-3.33%
6 Months-14.18%+6.82%-21%
1 Year-52.84%+8.93%-61.77%
2 Year-45.83%+47.64%-93.48%
3 Year+32.75%+125.5%-92.74%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score15 / 100Riskier than 63% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ ยท Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in balance sheet stress. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Balance Sheet Stress
+8.7 pts
Growth Sustainability
+6.3 pts
Final Composite Risk15 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 โ†’ 15 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWUniversal Inventory Divergence
+9.6 pts
NEWCapex Efficiency Stress
+7 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Inventory turnover

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
โ– Capex Efficiency Stress
MEDIUMPersistent
โ– Universal Inventory Divergence
MODERATEAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
โœ“ Relative Growth Weakness (Q4-FY26)โœ“ Inventory Stress (Q2-FY26)โœ“ Profit Collapse (Q2-FY24)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Universal Inventory DivergenceMODERATE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (7)Free Preview (2 of 7)

CriticalHigh
[F15]Universal Inventory Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Inv DivergenceHigh Tier
+22.6 ppDSI +21.0%
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

VEDL: Inventory growth outpaced Revenue growth by +22.6 pp (Inventory holding ratio increased +21.0%).

Forensic Implication

Slight build-up in inventory detected. Monitor for slowing sales momentum.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[M3]Capex Efficiency Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Capex / RevHigh Tier
23.1%Rev YoY -33.6%
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

Aggressive Capex (23.1%) amidst slow revenue growth (-33.6%).

Forensic Implication

Early signs of earnings quality decay. Profitability is being driven by non-core items.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
๐Ÿ”’
โญ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 7 Forensic Signals (5 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 7 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Vedanta Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free โ†’๐ŸŽ 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Vedanta Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Metals & Mining (n=37 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Metals & Mining(n=37 peers)
Median Risk: 15/100Position: 63th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient ยท 0 Breaks
โ† Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
5/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
10/100
15/100
LATEST
10โž”15/100
โ–ฒ5-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 โž” Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new Universal Inventory Divergence (+9.6 pts) and new Capex Efficiency Stress (+7.0 pts).

Reconciliation Bridgeยท Swipe โž”
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base10Q1 FY27
โž”
+ New Stress+16.62 flags
โž”
- Resolved00 flags cleared
โž”
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-9.6 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-2 pts).
-11.6Pillar Cap & Drift
โž”
Terminal15+5 net ยท Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+9.6 pts
Balance Sheet StressยทMODERATE Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Inventory accumulated faster than sales throughput, signalling working capital lockup.
Inventory YoY:-59.2%Revenue YoY:-33.6%
+7 pts
Growth SustainabilityยทMEDIUM Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Heavy capex during stagnant revenue growth.
Revenue YoY:-33.6%PAT YoY:+78.3%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+9.6 pts
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 9.6
Competitive Positionโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Qualityโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Governanceโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+7 pts
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 7
Solvencyโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(5.7)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘57th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(3.7)Weakโ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘37th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (15).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Vedanta Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited ยท Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
30.9%
Growingโ†‘
Cash Conversion (CCC)
-2 Days
Weakeningโ†“
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.39x
Improvingโ†“
Revenue Trend
โ‚น79,987 Cr
Weakeningโ†“
Swipe for all periods โ‡†
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggersโ€“โ€“โ€“
Revenue79,987156,643146,277150,159135,332-19%
growth % YoYโˆ’48.9%+7.1%โˆ’2.6%+11.0%โ€”โ€”
EBITDA24,75447,88640,55137,05646,656-13%
margin %30.9%30.6%27.7%24.7%34.5%โ€”
Net Profit25,09620,5357,53914,50323,710+20%
margin %31.4%13.1%5.2%9.7%17.5%โ€”
CFO39,49939,56235,65433,06534,963+6%
CFO / Net Profit1.57x1.93x4.73x2.28x1.47xโ€”
Debt26,99573,85371,75866,182โ€”-26%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2024 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosuresยท10 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
-2 days-20d YoY
Receivables:-2d
Inventory:-9d
Payables:+9d
Net Working Capital
โ‚น-531 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 13 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
โ‚น-14,403 Cr
PAT โˆ’ CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: โ‚น-91,360 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -6.6% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(โ‚น Cr)
1,3053,6363,6074,014โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventories(โ‚น Cr)
5,41414,47413,00115,012โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Trade Payables(โ‚น Cr)
7,25010,19510,09511,043โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Net Working Capital(โ‚น Cr)
-5317,9156,5137,983โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Working Capital / Sales(%)
-0.7%5.1%4.5%5.3%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
-2d18d16d19dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
6d8d9d10dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
25d34d32d36dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
33d24d25d27dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
-15.2%-6.3%-7.6%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
-13.7%+4.2%-10.8%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Asset Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+63.7%-0.5%-0.2%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”-35.6%โ€”
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(โ‚น Cr)
-14,403-19,027-28,115-18,562-11,253โ€”โ€”โ€”-3,674-6,767
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-6.6%-9.7%-14.5%-9.4%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”-1.9%-3.4%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
230.9%158.2%203.0%161.3%103.6%โ€”โ€”โ€”69.8%84.6%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Industry Intelligence

Metals & Mining KPIs
Gross Margin
โ“˜
Q2 FY2027
Current65.6%
QoQ Change+60 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change-230 bpsโ†“ Profitability contraction
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
โ“˜
Q2 FY2027
Current38.8%
QoQ Change+230 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+1430 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median15.5%
Asset Turnover
โ“˜
Q2 FY2027
Current0.30x
QoQ Changeโ€”โ†’ Stable asset efficiency
YoY Change+57.9%โ†‘ Asset efficiency accelerating
Industry Median1.15x
Working Capital Days
โ“˜
Q2 FY2027
Current-4 days
QoQ Changeโ€”
YoY Change-104.9%โ†“ Working capital speedup
Industry Median48 days

Understanding Metals & Mining KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More โ†’
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More โ†’
Asset Turnover: Revenue generated per rupee of asset base. Measures asset efficiency. Learn More โ†’
Working Capital Days: Average days working capital is locked in business cycle. Lower is more liquid. Learn More โ†’
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Promoter holding down 8.99 pp across 12 quarters โ€” requires monitoring
Promoter holding 54.72% (โˆ’8.99 pp across 12 quarters) ยท zero pledge or encumbrance ยท institutional holding 26.47%
Q2 FY2027 ยท latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.01 ppDII -0.14 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +0.13 pp
FII+DII Net: -0.13 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (54.72%)
FII (15.78%)
DII (10.69%)
Govt (0.06%)
Public (18.58%)
Others (0.17%)
Quarterly Progression
Total Pledged (% Eq)0.00%โ€”
1 unchanged โ€” Government 0.06% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in balance sheet stress remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation โ€ข What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of โ‚น233, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by -4.0% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than -4.0%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth-4.0%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery-16.8%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+12.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk38/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-19%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (-16.8%)
Market (-4.0%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing VEDL for -4.0% long-term growth versus -16.8% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-16.8% CAGR
โœ— Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
16.4% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
102.2% Conv
โœ“ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
50/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“Weak historical delivery
โœ“Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support20.46% (Strong)
Sector Premium-65% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)-4.0%-16.8%Demanding
Operating Margin (EBIT)26.3%16.4%Aggressive
Free Cash Flow Conversion70.5%102.2%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration and stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
โœ—RS continues to lag the market
โœ“Institutional flow has improved
โœ—Momentum remains negative
Summary
๐Ÿ”ดDiverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions104 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.2898ฯƒ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-14.4925%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
โ‚น96.1 Cr35.16% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
โ–ผ 62.0% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in โ‚น Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
โ‚น800.1 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (โ‰ฅโ‚น100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (โ‚น50โ€“โ‚น100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<โ‚น50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (โ‰ฅ1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.3428ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#1639 of 2259Bottom 27.45% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
-0.41ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
VEDL
STAGE 4 โ€ข DECLINE
โ€”
C:โ€”
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

๐Ÿ“ฌ Flagium Risk Brief โ€” Track forensic risks on VEDL & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue โ†’