YESBANKFinancial Services
Yes Bank Limited
Current Priceโ‚น22.54(-1.31%)
Market Capโ‚น62,218 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated29 Jul 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Composite forensic risk score based on earnings quality, cash flow, and balance sheet signals. Lower is better.
19/ 100
Risk Rating:Stable
โš ๏ธQoQ Trend:+1 pts (Risk Increased)
Business๐ŸŸข Stable
Primary DriverGovernance Integrity Shock
Valuationsโ—‹ Balanced
Implied ROE Gap-60.5%
Market Structureโ—‹ Improving
Stage 143 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment
๐ŸŸ  MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.
Business19/100StableQoQ Delta: +1 ptsRisk Trend: Early Deterioration
ValuationBalancedImplied 15.2% vs 8.7% ObservedValuation Risk: Medium
Market StructureStage 1 ยท Stage 1 โ€” AccumulationRegime Days: 43A/D Flow: Strong Distribution (-1.12ฯƒ)7D Ago Flow: โ€”

What Changed? THIS QUARTER

  • โœ—Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +1 pts)
  • โœ“Profitability margins pressure eased
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ“Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • โ—‹Institutional flow regime is Strong Distribution (-1.12ฯƒ)
  • โœ—Share price is down -6.8% this quarter (from โ‚น24.18 on 30 Jun to โ‚น22.54)

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH81/100
VALUATIONS SURVIVAL (CONSERVATISM)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION22/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Low
Balanced
High
Strong
Weak
๐ŸŸก

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น22.54(-1.31%)
1M Divergence-12.01%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-3.01%-0.5%-2.51%
1 Month-10.16%+1.84%-12.01%
6 Months+5.28%+7.51%-2.24%
1 Year+16.19%+15.33%+0.86%
2 Year-9.66%+2.15%-11.81%
3 Year+32.98%+38.06%-5.08%
๐Ÿ’ก

How to Read Business Analysis

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score19 / 100Riskier than 70.8% of Sector Peers
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend+1 QoQ ยท Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+1 pts)
Risk Acceleration+1 Qtrs
Escalation Prob.5%โœ… NEUTRAL
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in governance. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is gradually increasing.

Risk Score Composition
Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.

Governance
+19.0 pts
Final Composite Risk19 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 5 โ†’ 19 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
โš  Watch
Primary Deterioration Drivers
  • CAR Decay
  • Governance Integrity Shock
  • NIM Compression
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Governance Signals
โ– Governance Integrity Shock
SEVEREAccelerating
Solvency & Leverage
โ– CAR Decay
HIGHDecaying
Earning Quality
โ– NIM Compression
MEDIUMDecaying

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Solvency & Leverage
โ– CAR DecayHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

CAR Decay is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. We advise close monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)

CriticalHigh
CAR Decay
๐Ÿ›๏ธ Solvency & LeverageQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Impact Weight15/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ2 FY2026
YESBANK: CAR declining for 3 consecutive quarters in warning zone.

"Capital position is strengthening through fresh equity or higher profit retention."

Governance Integrity Shock
โš–๏ธ Governance SignalsQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtrs
Impact Weight12/15
MomentumAccelerating
Last SignalQ1 FY2027
YESBANK: Key governance event detected: DIRECTOR_RESIGNATION.

"Governance risk is elevated. Monitor board actions and promoter alignment."

NIM Compression
๐Ÿ“Š Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtrs
Impact Weight10/15
MomentumDecaying
Last SignalQ2 FY2024
YESBANK: NIM declining for 3 consecutive quarters.

"Pressure on core margins is stabilizing. Monitor for sustained interest income recovery."

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceLow
Escalation RiskLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=212 peers)

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(3.7)Weakโ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘37th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile

Deterioration Timeline

2027

Governance Integrity Shock

2026

CAR Decay

2025

CAR Decay

2024

CAR Decay

2024

CAR Decay

2024

NIM Compression

Key Financials (INR Cr)

Business Growth
Growingโ†‘
Profitability
Improvingโ†‘
Cash Generation
Improvingโ†‘
Asset Quality
Stableโ†”
Funding Trend
Decliningโ†“
PeriodNIIOperating Profit (PPOP)Net ProfitDepositsAdvances
FY20269,758-3,512318,969273,445
FY20258,920-2,446284,420246,120
FY20248,079-1,285266,230227,799
Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in governance remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of structural transparency and audit trails confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

MARKET EXPECTATION ENGINE
BALANCED EXPECTATIONS
๐Ÿ’ก

How to read this

We calculate the future growth rate the market is currently expecting and compare it to the company's historical delivery. A higher required growth target indicates more demanding market expectations and elevated expectation risk.

Sentinel InsightsThe market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE15.2%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE8.7%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap+6.5%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk Score54/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (8.7%)
Market (15.2%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing YESBANK for a 15.2% Return on Equity (implied from its 1.39x P/B) versus its 8.7% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear demanding. Valuation risk is Medium.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Audit
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
8.7% CAGR
โœ“ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
โœ— Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“High implied growth
โœ“Weak profitability support
โœ“Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium-66% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)15.2% (Implied)8.7% (Actual)Demanding
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)1.39x1.87xDiscount / Par
Return on Assets (ROA)0.82%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Moderate ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

๐Ÿ’ก

How to read Market Structure

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
ACCUMULATIONEARLY CYCLE
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
62%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains an early-stage base while momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
โœ“RS continues to lead the market
โœ—Institutional flow has deteriorated
โœ—Momentum remains negative
Summary
๐ŸŸ Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Weinstein Stage Analysis

S1
Accumulation
S2
Advancing
S3
Distribution
S4
Declining
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
62%
Readiness LabelModerate (Transition Potential Building)
Regime Sessions43 Sessions
Transition Probability51% Moderate
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.0566ฯƒ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStabilizing
150 DMA Slope+0.7687%
Participation & Volume
Avg Turnover (200D)โ‚น232.5 Cr
Liquidity RatingLiquid
ParticipationNeutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.2161ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#1801 of 2792Bottom 35.49% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
-1.12ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
YESBANK

Market Structure Analysis

Explore how each market indicator contributes to the current stage classification.

No market structure history available.
Methodology & Disclaimer

These analytics are derived from quantitative analysis of historical price, volume, and market participation data and are intended solely for informational and research purposes. They do not constitute investment advice, recommendations, or guarantees of future performance.