ABMKNO
NSE↗BSE↗Micro Cap
ABM Knowledgeware Limited
Information Technology›Software Products
Current Price₹156.52(+11.22%)
Market Cap₹313 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
10/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)38th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverOperating Leverage Stress
Valuations✗ Demanding
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 419 sessions

High-quality business currently experiencing weak market structure. Monitor for trend reversal. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🔴DivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

ABM Knowledgeware Limited (ABMKNO)•Updated yesterday

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased (Profit Collapse resolved)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.47σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -8.5% this quarter (from ₹170.98 on 30 Sept to ₹156.52)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Operating Leverage Stress and balance sheet impact
  • 🟢Profit Collapse resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH90/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)47/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION38/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹156.52(+11.22%)
1M Divergence-11.6%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+3.32%-1.9%+5.22%
1 Month-10.63%+0.97%-11.6%
6 Months-31.5%+9.46%-40.96%
1 Year-46.64%-7.18%-39.46%
2 Year+30.86%+3.58%+27.27%
3 Year+77.74%+82.69%-4.95%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score10 / 100Riskier than 38% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in growth sustainability. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Final Composite Risk10 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 10 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Risk Relief & Attribution Drivers
RESOLVEDProfit Collapse
-6.7 pts
PERSISTENTOperating Leverage Stress
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage Stress
HIGHPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ CFO-EBITDA Divergence (FY2026)✓ Profit Collapse (Q4-FY26)✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Operating leverage stress indicates a high fixed-cost base. This makes operating profit highly sensitive to any marginal drop in sales, compounding downside risk.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (4)Free Preview (2 of 4)

CriticalHigh
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+15.0%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 17.1%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[F5]Profit Collapse
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 2 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
PATHigh Tier
₹8,000,000 Cr↓ 75.3%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: ₹3.6 Cr
Empirical Trigger

ABMKNO: Net Profit collapsed by 75.3% from FY2025 Q4 to FY2026 Q4.

Forensic Implication

Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 4 Forensic Signals (2 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 4 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for ABM Knowledgeware Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for ABM Knowledgeware Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Information Technology (n=0 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Information Technology
Position: 38th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
10/100
LATEST
15➔10/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by Profit Collapse (-6.7 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base15Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved-6.71 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (+1.7 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
+1.7Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal10-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-6.7 pts
Earnings Quality·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Net profit rebounded or base-effect losses normalized, clearing the profit contraction threshold.
PAT YoY:-6.7%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality-5 pts
Q4 FY26: 5→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 10→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (40).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for ABM Knowledgeware Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
19.4%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
₹-11 Cr
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.00x
Stable↔
Revenue Trend
₹103 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue10397918096+9%
growth % YoY+6.2%+6.6%+13.8%−16.7%——
EBITDA20.026.023.022.020.0-3%
margin %19.4%26.8%25.3%27.5%20.8%—
Net Profit10.017.015.015.014.0-13%
margin %9.7%17.5%16.5%18.8%14.6%—
CFO(11.0)25.07.06.04.0n/m
CFO / Net Profit-1.10x1.47x0.47x0.40x0.29x—
Debt0.000.000.000.000.00n/m
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·9 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivable–Revenue Divergence: +18.7 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)Operating Cash Realisation Lag: CFO covers only -78.6% of reported EBITDA
Cash Conversion Cycle
—
Receivables:—
Inventory:—
Payables:—
Net Working Capital
₹58 Cr
Receivables + Inv − Payables
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹21 Cr
PAT − CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: ₹40 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Moderate Accruals
Accruals: 7.42% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
635046434226342154
Inventories(₹ Cr)
—————————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
5025814111
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
585044383312332053
Working Capital / Sales(%)
56.5%51.4%48.3%47.2%34.7%13.6%39.2%32.8%70.9%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
—————————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
222d189d184d194d158d105d147d126d266d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
—————————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
16d1d8d22d31d56d3d6d7d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+18.7%+2.7%-5.8%+19.0%+54.1%-29.5%+23.1%-43.4%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
—————————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-4.8%+0.7%-7.7%+20.9%-2.5%+7.8%-23.1%+26.4%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
21-8891056-2615
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
7.4%-3.0%3.1%3.7%4.3%2.4%3.2%-15.8%9.5%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
-78.6%138.9%41.2%35.3%23.5%65.4%61.1%205.0%-5.6%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.0%
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 66.92% unchanged across 12 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q1 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q1 FY2027):FII 0 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic 0 pp
FII+DII Net: 0 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q1 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (66.92%)
FII (0.00%)
DII (0.00%)
Public (33.08%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 66.92% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹157, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 26.9% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 26.9%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR26.9%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR8.8%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+18.1%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk68/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (29%)
Historical (8.8%)
Market (26.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing ABMKNO for 26.9% implied revenue growth versus 8.8% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
8.8% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
16.9% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
7.2% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
25/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-4.79% (Weak)
Sector Premium+1% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)26.9%8.8%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)14.0%16.9%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion-102.5%7.2%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
5%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowNeutral
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Institutional participation remains distribution, while trend quality stays weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
○Institutional flow remains neutral
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🔴Diverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
5%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions19 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.1645σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-4.0305%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹0 Cr64.27% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 25.0% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.4607σ
Universe Rank
#1872 of 2259Bottom 17.13% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.47σ
7D Flow TrendNeutral
ABMKNO
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on ABMKNO & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →