ADROITIND
Adroit Industries (India) Limited
Information Technology›IT Enabled Services
Current Price₹168.85(+3.63%)
Market CapN/A
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
16/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)50th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +16 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverReceivables-Revenue Divergence
Valuations○ Balanced
Valuation Score50/100Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 119 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Adroit Industries (India) Limited (ADROITIND)•Updated today

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
12 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q1 FY2027, Adroit Industries (India) Limited demonstrates robust operational execution, reporting revenue of ₹35.4 Cr, an EBITDA margin of 33.5% (EBITDA of ₹11.8 Cr), and a reported net profit of ₹7.5 Cr with zero emergent forensic signals. This operational run-rate is underpinned by the audited FY2026 balance sheet anchor, characterized by cash-backed operational strength with an operating cash flow of ₹29.4 Cr (CFO/PAT of 1.13) and ongoing deleveraging to a conservative debt-to-equity ratio of 0.41 (total debt contracting 19.0% YoY to ₹52.7 Cr), keeping the company securely within Flagium's stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +16 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗New risk trigger: Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+13 pts)
  • ✓Growth expectations are conservative
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (0.00σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -32.0% this quarter (from ₹248.39 on 30 Sept to ₹168.85)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 1 active forensic warning flag for structural stress
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 16.0 ptsEarnings Quality
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH84/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)50/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION50/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹168.85(+3.63%)
1M Divergence0.00%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+1.38%-1.9%+3.28%
1 MonthN/A+0.97%N/A
6 MonthsN/A+9.46%N/A
1 YearN/A-7.18%N/A
2 Year-32.02%+3.58%-35.61%
3 Year-32.02%+82.69%-114.72%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score16 / 100Riskier than 50% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+16 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+16 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in profitability and earnings quality. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+16.0 pts
Final Composite Risk16 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 16 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
ESCALATING RISK
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWReceivables-Revenue Divergence
+13 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Receivables-Revenue Divergence
SEVEREAccelerating

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Receivables-Revenue DivergenceSEVERE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Working capital cycles are stretching, led by receivables-revenue divergence. This delays cash generation from core operations and locks up liquidity.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (1)

CriticalHigh
[F11]Receivables-Revenue Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rec DivergenceHigh Tier
+102.8 ppDSRI 4.16x
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

ADROITIND: Trade Receivables growth outpaced Revenue by +102.8 pp (DSRI: 4.16x).

Forensic Implication

Early signs of slowing collections. Monitor for pressure on the cash flow cycle.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Adroit Industries (India) Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Information Technology (n=109 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Information Technology(n=109 peers)
Median Risk: 14/100Position: 50th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
16/100
BREAKLATEST
0➔16/100
▲16-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Structural Break Quarter
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated materially (+16.0 pts), driven by new Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+13.0 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base0Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+131 flag
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (+3 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
+3Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal16+16 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
New Stress (1 Flag)
+13 pts
Earnings Quality·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Accounts receivable outgrew top-line sales, extending cash conversion cycles.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality+16.2 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 16.2
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q2 FY270 → 16 | +16 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+16.0 pts), driven by new Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+13.0 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 1 new risk signal emerged: Receivables-Revenue Divergence

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(3.6)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░36th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (14).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Adroit Industries (India) Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
31.0%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
216 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.41x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹135 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Structural triggers–––
Revenue135127118
growth % YoY+5.7%+8.1%—
EBITDA41.733.530.0
margin %31.0%26.3%25.5%
Net Profit26.118.114.5
margin %19.4%14.2%12.3%
CFO29.420.319.9
CFO / Net Profit1.13x1.12x1.37x
Debt52.765.082.1
Structural triggers first appear in FY2027 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·3 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Stretched Working Capital Cycle: CCC at 216 days
Cash Conversion Cycle
216 days-5d YoY
Receivables:+9d
Inventory:+12d
Payables:+26d
Net Working Capital
₹79 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 216 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-3 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-10 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -1.64% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
454032
Inventories(₹ Cr)
554853
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
211116
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
797769
Working Capital / Sales(%)
59.0%60.4%58.2%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
216d221d212d
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
123d114d99d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
150d138d163d
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
57d31d50d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+7.9%+16.3%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+9.4%-17.1%—
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+8.1%-14.3%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-3-2-5
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-1.6%-1.1%-2.7%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
82.3%66.9%64.2%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
8.0%—0.0%
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor1QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 71.86% unchanged across 1 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 11.70%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (71.86%)
FII (0.49%)
DII (11.21%)
Public (16.44%)
Quarterly Progression
7 unchanged — Promoters 71.86% · FII / FPI 0.49% · DII (MFs/Ins) 11.21% · Government 0.00% · Public & Retail 16.44% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 1 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

We calculate the future growth rate the market is currently expecting and compare it to the company's historical delivery. A higher required growth target indicates more demanding market expectations and elevated expectation risk.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied GrowthN/AFuture Growth Needed
Historical Delivery20.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation GapN/AGrowth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk50/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-5.0%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (25.0%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (N/A)
Valuation Summary

Using the Relative Valuation Model, standard growth models could not compute expectations for Adroit Industries (India) Limited due to negative or volatile trailing free cash flow. However, it trades at P/E of N/A (vs sector median of 24.3x).

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
25.6% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
53.8% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector PremiumN/A
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)64.5%20.0%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)26.6%25.6%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion60.8%53.8%Demanding

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowNeutral
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Institutional participation remains neutral, while trend quality stays an early-stage base and momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
○Long-term trend vs 150DMA is unavailable
○Long-term trend vs 200DMA is unavailable
○RS data is unavailable
○Institutional flow remains neutral
○Momentum data is unavailable
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions19 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
N/A
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityEarly Base
150 DMA SlopeN/A
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
N/A
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
N/ASteady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
N/A
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
N/A
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
N/A
Universe Rank
N/A
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
0.00σ
7D Flow TrendNeutral
ADROITIND
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on ADROITIND & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →