AJMERA
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap
Ajmera Realty & Infra India Limited
Realty›Residential Commercial Projects
Current Price₹133.8(+4.43%)
Market Cap₹2,633 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
10/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)33rd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
StableQoQ Delta 0 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverOperating Leverage Stress
Valuations○ Balanced
Expectation Gap-99.3%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 19 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Ajmera Realty & Infra India Limited (AJMERA)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, Ajmera Realty & Infra India Limited reported a 24.7% YoY deterioration in net profit to ₹157.1 Cr, compared with ₹126.0 Cr in the prior year. Profitability is being eroded by a persistent operating leverage gap, with expenses outpacing sales growth, and a cash conversion deficit that has abated in the latest period. Operating leverage stress is compounded by a 11.0% gap between expense and revenue growth, muting operating cash generation to ₹68.6 Cr. Despite this, the company maintains strong interest coverage, with EBIT of ₹681 Cr covering interest expenses of ₹283 Cr. Total debt of ₹711.2 Cr, at a D/E of 0.47, remains manageable, though working capital friction—reflected in receivable days of 42.4—keeps Ajmera within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: 0 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (2.47σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +12.7% this quarter (from ₹118.74 on 30 Sept to ₹133.8)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Operating Leverage Stress and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH90/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)46/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION100/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹133.8(+4.43%)
1M Divergence+18.28%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+6.21%-1.37%+7.58%
1 Month+11.85%-6.43%+18.28%
6 Months+7.64%+0.1%+7.54%
1 Year-33.7%-5.02%-28.68%
2 Year-23.63%+35.37%-59%
3 Year+74.79%+130.26%-55.48%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score10 / 100Riskier than 33% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend0 QoQ · StableNo change in risk score
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure has stabilized in growth sustainability. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. No major change in risk trend.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Final Composite Risk10 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 4 → 10 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
STABLE
Primary Deterioration Drivers
ESCOperating Leverage Stress
+1.2 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage Stress
HIGHPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2026)✓ Low Interest Coverage (Q4-FY24)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Operating leverage stress indicates a high fixed-cost base. This makes operating profit highly sensitive to any marginal drop in sales, compounding downside risk.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+11.0%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 20.8%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[F1]Cash Conversion Deficit
Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 3 Years
Framework: Statutory Annual
PATHigh Tier
₹157 CrOCF ₹68.6 Cr
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineStatutory Norm: CFO ≥ 80% PAT
Empirical Trigger

AJMERA: OCF below Net Profit in 2/3 recent years.

Forensic Implication

Cash conversion has normalized in the latest period. Operational cash flow is back in sync.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: FY2026
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Ajmera Realty & Infra India Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Ajmera Realty & Infra India Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Realty (n=48 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Realty(n=48 peers)
Median Risk: 23.5/100Position: 33th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
4/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
8/100
10/100
10/100
LATEST
10➔10/100
■0-point change(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk profile held steady overall despite severity escalation in Operating Leverage Stress (+1.2 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base10Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+1.21 flag
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-1.2 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
-1.2Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal100 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
Escalated Stress (1 Flag)
+1.2 pts
Growth Sustainability·Escalated Risk
• Trigger:Operating expense growth outpaced revenue growth, breaching operating leverage stress threshold.
Revenue YoY:+23.1%Op. Expenses YoY:+27.3%Operating Margin:20.0% → 19.3%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 10→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (23.5).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Ajmera Realty & Infra India Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
27.9%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
619 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.47x
Deteriorating↑
Revenue Trend
₹1,098 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
Revenue1,098753708441489+36%
growth % YoY+45.8%+6.4%+60.6%−9.9%——
EBITDA306246209134123+32%
margin %27.9%32.6%29.5%30.4%25.1%—
Net Profit1571261037245+30%
margin %14.3%16.7%14.5%16.2%9.3%—
CFO698220(36)(151)n/m
CFO / Net Profit0.44x0.06x2.14x-0.50x-3.33x—
Debt711676808826—-5%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2024 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Stretched Working Capital Cycle: CCC at 619 daysOperating Cash Realisation Lag: CFO covers only 30.0% of reported EBITDA
Cash Conversion Cycle
619 days-131d YoY
Receivables:-12d
Inventory:-129d
Payables:-10d
Net Working Capital
₹1,863 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 778 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹88 Cr
PAT − CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: ₹393 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Moderate Accruals
Accruals: 3.65% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2018FY2017FY2016
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
424316215137——————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
1,4951,2921,1571,175——————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
57593738——————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
1,8631,5491,3341,274——————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
169.6%205.7%188.5%289.1%——————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2018FY2017FY2016
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
619d750d688d1055d——————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
141d153d111d113d——————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
497d626d596d974d——————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
19d29d19d32d——————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2018FY2017FY2016
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-11.7%+40.8%-3.7%———————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-30.1%+5.3%-62.2%———————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-30.8%+8.4%-58.5%————-25.1%+24.6%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
88118-117107197——2007-73
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
3.6%5.6%-6.0%5.6%———13.6%0.5%-5.8%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
30.0%4.5%158.3%-37.0%-244.9%——-84.1%55.1%143.4%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
——————————

Industry Intelligence

Realty KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current36.8%
QoQ Change+940 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+970 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current29.4%
QoQ Change+400 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change-120 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Realty KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 68.56% (−1.17 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 1.63%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.18 ppDII +0.04 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +0.13 pp
FII+DII Net: -0.14 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (68.56%)
FII (0.77%)
DII (0.86%)
Public (29.81%)
Quarterly Progression
Total Pledged (% Eq)0.00%—
1 unchanged — Government 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹134, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 49.8% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 49.8%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth49.8%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery20.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+29.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk55/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (52%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (49.8%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing AJMERA for 49.8% long-term growth versus 20.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
20.9% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
59.4% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
55/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support1.51% (Moderate)
Sector Premium-38% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)49.8%20.0%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)20.2%20.9%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion17.1%59.4%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
46%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the an early-stage base trend as momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
46%
Readiness LabelModerate (Transition Potential Building)
Regime Sessions9 Sessions
Transition Probability10% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.6198σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStabilizing
150 DMA Slope-0.1708%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹6.7 Cr63.2% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 14.0% (21D vs 200D Avg)Steady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹6.7 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.4656σ
Universe Rank
#334 of 2259Top 14.79% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+2.47σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
AJMERA
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on AJMERA & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →