ALANKIT
Alankit Limited
Servicesโ€บCommercial Services & Suppliesโ€บDiversified Commercial Services
Current Priceโ‚น7.1(+1%)
Market Capโ‚น193 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
11/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean โ€ข 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)56th Percentile ยท Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business๐ŸŸข Stable
Primary DriverReceivables-Revenue Divergence
Valuationsโœ“ Conservative
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structureโœ— Weak
Stage 4104 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment๐Ÿ”ดDivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Alankit Limited (ALANKIT)โ€ขUpdated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, Alankit Limited is navigating a period of operating deterioration, with a 3.7% YoY decline in reported net profit to โ‚น20.9 Cr and a 165.7% YoY contraction in operating cash flow to โ‚น-22.1 Cr. This earnings quality crisis is compounded by operational friction: expenses outpacing sales, debtor days at 1.17x, and a 159.0% inventory-revenue divergence, signaling structural strain in working capital management. Against this liquidity strain, total debt expanded 52.2% to โ‚น17.5 Cr, pushing interest coverage down to -33.52x and entering Flagium's heightened surveillance range. The firm's negative operating leverage gap of 11.5% and cash conversion deficit further highlight the balance sheet pressure, though deleveraging efforts are underway as earnings quality stabilizes.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • โœ—Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • โœ“Profitability margins pressure eased (Profit Collapse resolved)
  • โœ—New risk trigger: Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+11.5 pts)
  • โœ“Growth expectations are conservative
  • โœ—Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • โœ“Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (1.31ฯƒ)
  • โœ—Share price is down -9.3% this quarter (from โ‚น7.83 on 30 Sept to โ‚น7.1)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • ๐Ÿ”ดInvestigate Receivables-Revenue Divergence and balance sheet impact
  • ๐ŸŸขProfit Collapse resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • ๐ŸŸขMaintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 6.5 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 4.5 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH89/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)53/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION83/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
๐ŸŸข
Profile: STRONG ร— ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น7.1(+1%)
1M Divergence-1.61%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+0.85%-1.37%+2.23%
1 Month-8.03%-6.43%-1.61%
6 Months-22.99%+0.1%-23.09%
1 Year-41.08%-5.02%-36.06%
2 Year-66.54%+35.37%-101.91%
3 Year-29%+130.26%-159.26%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score11 / 100Riskier than 56% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ ยท Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in profitability and earnings quality. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+6.5 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+4.5 pts
Final Composite Risk11 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has declined from 15 โ†’ 11 over 14 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWReceivables-Revenue Divergence
+11.5 pts
NEWUniversal Inventory Divergence
+8.1 pts
RESOLVEDProfit Collapse
-7.7 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Inventory turnover

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
โ– Receivables-Revenue Divergence
HIGHAccelerating
โ– Universal Inventory Divergence
HIGHAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
โœ“ Profit Collapse (Q4-FY26)โœ“ Margin Compression (Q2-FY26)โœ“ Operating Leverage Stress (Q2-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Receivables-Revenue DivergenceHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Working capital cycles are stretching, led by receivables-revenue divergence. This delays cash generation from core operations and locks up liquidity.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (9)Free Preview (2 of 9)

CriticalHigh
[F11]Receivables-Revenue Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rec DivergenceHigh Tier
+20.9 ppDSRI 1.17x
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

ALANKIT: Trade Receivables growth outpaced Revenue by +20.9 pp (DSRI: 1.17x).

Forensic Implication

Debtor days have spiked. Customers are taking significantly longer to pay their bills.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[F15]Universal Inventory Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Inv DivergenceHigh Tier
+159.0 ppDSI +130.9%
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

ALANKIT: Inventory growth outpaced Revenue growth by +159.0 pp (Inventory holding ratio increased +130.9%).

Forensic Implication

Stock is piling up in the warehouse. Inventory turnover is slowing down dangerously.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
๐Ÿ”’
โญ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 9 Forensic Signals (7 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 9 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Alankit Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free โ†’๐ŸŽ 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Alankit Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Services (n=11 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Services(n=11 peers)
Median Risk: 17/100Position: 56th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient ยท 0 Breaks
โ† Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
5/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
10/100
6/100
11/100
LATEST
6โž”11/100
โ–ฒ5-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 โž” Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+11.5 pts) and new Universal Inventory Divergence (+8.1 pts), partially offset by Profit Collapse relief (-7.7 pts).

Reconciliation Bridgeยท Swipe โž”
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base6Q4 FY26
โž”
+ New Stress+19.62 flags
โž”
- Resolved-7.71 flag cleared
โž”
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-2.9 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-4 pts).
-6.9Pillar Cap & Drift
โž”
Terminal11+5 net ยท Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter3 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+11.5 pts
Earnings QualityยทHIGH Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Accounts receivable outgrew top-line sales, extending cash conversion cycles.
Revenue YoY:-24.1%
+8.1 pts
Balance Sheet StressยทHIGH Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Inventory accumulated faster than sales throughput, signalling working capital lockup.
Revenue YoY:-24.1%
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-7.7 pts
Earnings QualityยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Net profit rebounded or base-effect losses normalized, clearing the profit contraction threshold.
PAT YoY:-10.8%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+6 pts
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 6
Competitive Positionโ€”
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality+2.8 pts
Q4 FY26: 5.8โ†’Q1 FY27: 8.6
Governanceโ€”
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainabilityโ€”
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Solvencyโ€”
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(5.7)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘57th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(7)Goodโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘70th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (17).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Alankit Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited ยท Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
10.5%
Weakeningโ†“
Cash Conversion (CCC)
92 Days
Weakeningโ†“
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.05x
Deterioratingโ†‘
Revenue Trend
โ‚น373 Cr
Growingโ†‘
Swipe for all periods โ‡†
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggersโ€“โ€“โ€“
Revenue373319248322137+5%
growth % YoY+16.9%+29.0%โˆ’23.1%+135.4%โ€”โ€”
EBITDA39.145.235.8(28.3)18.7n/m
margin %10.5%14.1%14.4%-8.8%13.7%โ€”
Net Profit20.921.722.0(35.1)2.9n/m
margin %5.6%6.8%8.9%-10.9%2.1%โ€”
CFO(22.1)33.69.6(49.4)1.6n/m
CFO / Net Profit-1.06x1.55x0.44x1.41x0.56xโ€”
Debt17.511.543.613.5โ€”+9%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2024 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosuresยท10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Inventoryโ€“Revenue Divergence: +309.8 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)Elevated Accrual Pressure: Accrual Ratio at 9.69% of average assetsOperating Cycle Elongation: CCC widened by +41 days YoYOperating Cash Realisation Lag: CFO covers only -96.6% of reported EBITDA
Cash Conversion Cycle
92 days+41d YoY
Receivables:+3d
Inventory:+24d
Payables:-14d
Net Working Capital
โ‚น94 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 66 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
โ‚น43 Cr
PAT โˆ’ CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: โ‚น58 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Elevated Accrual Pressure
Accruals: 9.69% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(โ‚น Cr)
73597268โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventories(โ‚น Cr)
33865โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Trade Payables(โ‚น Cr)
13233126โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Net Working Capital(โ‚น Cr)
94444747โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Working Capital / Sales(%)
25.1%13.8%18.9%14.5%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
92d51d70d53dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
71d68d106d78dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
33d9d10d5dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
12d26d46d30dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+6.2%-46.5%+28.1%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+309.8%-7.7%+56.2%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Asset Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
-8.2%-49.1%+98.8%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”+38.0%โ€”
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(โ‚น Cr)
43-121214113โ€”โ€”-611
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
9.7%-2.5%3.0%4.7%โ€”7.9%โ€”โ€”-5.9%14.1%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
-96.6%91.0%35.6%-420.9%19.0%-10.5%โ€”โ€”96.6%9.5%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Industry Intelligence

Services KPIs
EBITDA Margin
โ“˜
Q1 FY2027
Current12.7%
QoQ Change+530 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+120 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median15.5%
Asset Turnover
โ“˜
Q1 FY2027
Current0.18x
QoQ Change-21.7%โ†“ Asset utilization moderating
YoY Change-28.0%โ†“ Asset utilization moderating
Industry Median1.15x

Understanding Services KPIs

EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More โ†’
Asset Turnover: Revenue generated per rupee of asset base. Measures asset efficiency. Learn More โ†’
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 54.15% (+2.13 pp across 12 quarters) ยท zero pledge or encumbrance ยท institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q2 FY2027 ยท latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII 0 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic 0 pp
FII+DII Net: 0 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (54.15%)
FII (0.38%)
DII (0.05%)
Public (45.42%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged โ€” DII (MFs/Ins) 0.05% ยท Government 0.00% ยท Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% ยท Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation โ€ข What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of โ‚น7, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by -13.5% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than -13.5%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR-13.5%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR5.1%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap-18.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk20/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-15%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (5.1%)
Market (-13.5%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing ALANKIT for -13.5% implied revenue growth versus 5.1% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear conservative, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
5.1% CAGR
โœ“ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
9.5% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-79.3% Conv
โœ— Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“Weak profitability support
โœ“Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-11.45% (Weak)
Sector Premium-59% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)-13.5%5.1%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)6.3%9.5%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion-100.1%-79.3%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
โœ—RS continues to lag the market
โœ“Institutional flow has improved
โœ—Momentum remains negative
Summary
๐Ÿ”ดDiverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions104 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.6881ฯƒ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-1.4175%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
โ‚น0.1 Cr65.14% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
โ–ผ 33.3% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in โ‚น Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
โ‚น0.2 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (โ‰ฅโ‚น100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (โ‚น50โ€“โ‚น100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<โ‚น50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (โ‰ฅ1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.2420ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#1417 of 2259Bottom 37.27% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
+1.31ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
ALANKIT
STAGE 4 โ€ข DECLINE
โ€”
C:โ€”
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

๐Ÿ“ฌ Flagium Risk Brief โ€” Track forensic risks on ALANKIT & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue โ†’