ALOKINDS
Alok Industries Limited
Textiles›Textiles & Apparels›Other Textile Products
Current Price₹8.3(+0.97%)
Market Cap₹4,121 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
25/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)100th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuations✗ Demanding
Valuation Score79/100Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 4104 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🔴DivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Alok Industries Limited (ALOKINDS)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
15 Oct 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In Q2 FY2027, Alok Industries Limited reported a 54.3% YoY deterioration in net profit, widening to a loss of ₹208.4 Cr from ₹162.4 Cr in the prior quarter, while EBITDA margins compressed by -5.4 pp to 1.0% YoY. This follows a trajectory since FY2026 where Q1 FY2027 saw EBITDA margins at 8.0%, and Q2 FY2027 further eroded to 1.0%, signaling persistent margin stress. The operational strain is partially offset by FY2026 balance sheet fundamentals, where operating cash flow of ₹419.3 Cr and total debt of ₹26,104.9 Cr provide liquidity capacity, though interest coverage at 0.09x remains dangerously low. Active signals indicate working capital expansion is easing, and revenue-debt divergence is improving, but margin stress and low interest coverage persist, keeping the firm under heightened surveillance within Flagium's framework.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (1.25σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +17.1% this quarter (from ₹7.09 on 30 Sept to ₹8.3)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Low Interest Coverage and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 11.5 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 3.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH75/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)44/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION81/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹8.3(+0.97%)
1M Divergence+21.65%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+1.97%-1.46%+3.43%
1 Month+14.96%-6.69%+21.65%
6 Months-39.81%+6.82%-46.63%
1 Year-52.38%+8.93%-61.31%
2 Year-61.45%+47.64%-109.09%
3 Year-52.84%+125.5%-178.34%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score25 / 100Riskier than 100% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in balance sheet stress. This suggests the risk profile is currently stabilizing. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Balance Sheet Stress
+11.5 pts
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+3.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk25 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 15 → 25 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Deterioration Drivers
ESCIndustrial Margin Stress
+2.7 pts
PERSISTENTLow Interest Coverage
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Interest coverage ratio

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin Stress
SEVEREAccelerating
Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
HIGHPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Relative Growth Weakness (Q4-FY26)✓ Inventory Stress (Q4-FY26)✓ Working Capital Expansion (Q4-FY25)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin StressSEVERE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Industrial Margin Stress is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (6)Free Preview (2 of 6)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 2 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
-9.7%↑ 24 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: -18.8%
Empirical Trigger

ALOKINDS: Raw material costs consumed an additional 9.7% of revenue YoY.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[F4]Low Interest Coverage
Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 14 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CoverageCritical Tier
-0.36xEBIT -₹55.0 Cr
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineSolvency Floor: 2.50x
Empirical Trigger

ALOKINDS: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.36x in FY2027 Q2 (Threshold: 2.5x).

Forensic Implication

Interest coverage is dangerously low. Even a minor fall in profit could trigger a default.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 6 Forensic Signals (4 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 6 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Alok Industries Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Alok Industries Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Textiles (n=52 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Textiles(n=52 peers)
Median Risk: 20/100Position: 100th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
10/100
Base
15/100
11/100
20/100
15/100
20/100
24/100
27/100
26/100
35/100
30/100
25/100
LATEST
30➔25/100
▼5-point improvement(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by overall risk reduction across core indicators, partially offset by Industrial Margin Stress (+2.7 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base30Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+2.71 flag
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-10.7 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+3 pts).
-7.7Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal25-5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
Escalated Stress (1 Flag)
+2.7 pts
Growth Sustainability·Escalated Risk
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:-15.5% → -15.9%Revenue YoY:+8.9%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q1 FY27: 11.5→Q2 FY27: 11.5
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 10→Q2 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(4.2)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░42th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (20).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Alok Industries Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
3.5%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
61 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
₹26,105 Cr
Deteriorating↑
Revenue Trend
₹3,789 Cr
Weakening↓
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
Revenue3,7893,8205,5337,0027,354-19%
growth % YoY−0.8%−31.0%−21.0%−4.8%——
EBITDA13411672(13)610n/m
margin %3.5%3.0%1.3%-0.2%8.3%—
Net Profit(744)(816)(847)(880)(209)n/m
margin %-19.6%-21.4%-15.3%-12.6%-2.8%—
CFO419116(1,161)813185-20%
CFO / Net Profit-0.56x-0.14x1.37x-0.92x-0.89x—
Debt26,10525,96026,00824,151—+3%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·7 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
61 days-25d YoY
Receivables:-11d
Inventory:+2d
Payables:+16d
Net Working Capital
₹638 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 49 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-1,163 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-3,869 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -17.62% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
318440465345———
Inventories(₹ Cr)
8868669421,039———
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
5674114891,625———
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
638895918-242———
Working Capital / Sales(%)
16.8%23.4%16.6%-3.4%———

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
61d86d61d-13d———
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
31d42d31d18d———
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
85d83d62d54d———
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
55d39d32d85d———

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-26.7%+25.5%+55.8%————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+3.1%+23.0%+11.6%————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-3.0%+21.8%+20.3%————
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-1,163-933314-1,694-393——
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-17.6%-13.2%4.2%-22.7%———
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
———————
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
———————

Industry Intelligence

Textiles KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current42.3%
QoQ Change-370 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-970 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current1.0%
QoQ Change-700 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-540 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median15.5%
Asset Turnover
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current0.17x
QoQ Change—
YoY Change+13.3%↑ Asset efficiency accelerating
Industry Median1.15x
Working Capital Days
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current169 days
QoQ Change—
YoY Change-40.7%↓ Working capital speedup
Industry Median48 days

Understanding Textiles KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Asset Turnover: Revenue generated per rupee of asset base. Measures asset efficiency. Learn More →
Working Capital Days: Average days working capital is locked in business cycle. Lower is more liquid. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Institutional & Governance Signals
Promoter Trimming: Promoter holding dropped by 3.80 pp QoQ.
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.11 ppDII -0.07 ppPromoters -3.8 ppPublic +3.97 pp
FII+DII Net: -0.18 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (71.20%)
FII (1.79%)
DII (0.32%)
Public (26.69%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently improving. Recent structural triggers in balance sheet stress suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in core structural metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹8, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 60.4% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 60.4%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth60.4%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery20.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+40.4%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk79/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (62%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (60.4%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing ALOKINDS for 60.4% long-term growth versus 20.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
-19.8% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
0.0% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support4.29% (Moderate)
Sector Premium+2089% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)60.4%20.0%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)-18.7%-19.8%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion19.4%0.0%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
10%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🔴Diverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
10%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions104 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.6980σ Healthy
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-5.9621%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹3.1 Cr35.15% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +27.2% (21D vs 200D Avg)Expanding Accumulation Trend
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹12.2 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Healthy

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.3763σ
Universe Rank
#1713 of 2259Bottom 24.17% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+1.25σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
ALOKINDS
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on ALOKINDS & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →