ARFIN
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap
Arfin India Limited
Metals & Mining›Non - Ferrous Metals›Aluminium
Current Price₹87.35(-2.21%)
Market Cap₹1,474 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
12/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)37th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuations✗ Demanding
Expectation Gap-89.6%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure○ Topping
Stage 34 sessions

Improving fundamentals and stabilizing technical baseline. Base building process active. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Arfin India Limited (ARFIN)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Arfin India Limited is experiencing a severe earnings quality crisis, marked by a 71.7% YoY deterioration in reported net profit, swinging to a loss of ₹15.5 Cr from a profit of ₹9.0 Cr in the prior year. Profitability is being hollowed out by intensifying margin compression: EBIT margins fell to 2.7% from 6.3% YoY, signaling significant internal efficiency stress. This operating deterioration is reflected in a severe working capital expansion: receivable days rose to 23.9 from 4.5 YoY, contributing to a 207.0% YoY drop in operating cash flow to ₹22.5 Cr. Against this liquidity strain, total debt expanded 10.5% to ₹129.3 Cr, pushing interest coverage down to 2.03x and entering Flagium's heightened surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✗New risk trigger: Industrial Margin Stress (+9.6 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Strong Distribution (-1.69σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -2.1% this quarter (from ₹89.19 on 30 Sept to ₹87.35)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Industrial Margin Stress and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 7.2 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 4.8 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH88/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)45/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION8/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹87.35(-2.21%)
1M Divergence+5.41%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-4.95%-1.46%-3.49%
1 Month-1.28%-6.69%+5.41%
6 Months-7.56%+6.82%-14.38%
1 Year+62.06%+8.93%+53.13%
2 Year+155.56%+47.64%+107.92%
3 Year+155.56%+125.5%+30.06%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score12 / 100Riskier than 37% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in growth sustainability. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+7.2 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+4.8 pts
Final Composite Risk12 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 12 over 13 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWIndustrial Margin Stress
+9.6 pts
NEWLow Interest Coverage
+6.4 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Interest coverage ratio

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin Stress
HIGHAccelerating
Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
MEDIUMPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Working Capital Expansion (Q2-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Industrial Margin Stress is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
2.7%↓ 357 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 5.0%
Empirical Trigger

ARFIN: EBITDA margin compressed by 3.6 bps YoY.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[F4]Low Interest Coverage
Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CoverageCritical Tier
2.03xEBIT ₹9.1 Cr
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineSolvency Floor: 2.50x
Empirical Trigger

ARFIN: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.03x in FY2027 Q1 (Threshold: 2.5x).

Forensic Implication

Earnings buffer for interest payments is narrowing. Monitor for margin pressure.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Arfin India Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Arfin India Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Metals & Mining (n=37 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Metals & Mining(n=37 peers)
Median Risk: 15/100Position: 37th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
17/100
BREAK
12/100
7/100
12/100
LATEST
7➔12/100
▲5-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new Industrial Margin Stress (+9.6 pts) and new Low Interest Coverage (+6.4 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base7Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+162 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-7 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-4 pts).
-11Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal12+5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+9.6 pts
Growth Sustainability·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:5.6% → 2.2%Revenue YoY:+94.8%
+6.4 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Finance costs elevated relative to operating profit, narrowing interest coverage headroom.
Interest Coverage:2.8x → 1.0x
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+6.4 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 6.4
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+9.6 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 9.6
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q2 FY265 → 17 | +12 pts

Risk deteriorated notably (+12.0 pts), driven by new Working Capital Expansion (+10.8 pts), partially offset by Low Interest Coverage relief (-1.3 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 1 new risk signal emerged: Working Capital Expansion
•Revenue YoY: -13.8%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(7.6)Good★★★★☆
████░76th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(2.8)Weak★☆☆☆☆
█░░░░28th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (15).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Arfin India Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
7.6%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
114 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.76x
Deteriorating↑
Revenue Trend
₹619 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Structural triggers––
Revenue619616535
growth % YoY+0.5%+15.1%—
EBITDA47.138.033.0
margin %7.6%6.2%6.2%
Net Profit15.59.08.0
margin %2.5%1.5%1.5%
CFO22.5(21.0)5.0
CFO / Net Profit1.45x-2.33x0.63x
Debt129117120
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·3 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
114 days
Receivables:—
Inventory:—
Payables:—
Net Working Capital
₹194 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 114 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-7 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹26 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -1.96% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
30——
Inventories(₹ Cr)
223——
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
59——
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
194——
Working Capital / Sales(%)
31.4%——

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
114d——
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
18d——
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
131d——
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
35d——

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+7.5%+5.6%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-7303
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-2.0%9.5%1.1%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
94.8%-58.3%16.7%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
0.0%——

Industry Intelligence

Metals & Mining KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current18.2%
QoQ Change+750 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+1790 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current4.9%
QoQ Change-340 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-160 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Metals & Mining KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor5QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 69.77% unchanged across 5 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 0.60%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.19 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +0.19 pp
FII+DII Net: -0.19 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (69.77%)
FII (0.60%)
DII (0.00%)
Govt (0.04%)
Public (29.59%)
Quarterly Progression
5 unchanged — Promoters 69.77% · DII (MFs/Ins) 0.00% · Government 0.04% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 5 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹87, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 51.2% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 51.2%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth51.2%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery20.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+31.2%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk96/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (53%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (51.2%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing ARFIN for 51.2% long-term growth versus 20.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
5.1% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-8.3% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support0.75% (Weak)
Sector Premium+225% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)51.2%20.0%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)3.7%5.1%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion41.2%-8.3%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
20%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowNeutral
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Institutional participation remains strong distribution, while trend quality stays weakening and momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
○Institutional flow remains neutral
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
20%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions4 Sessions
Transition Probability41% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.9387σ Healthy
Trend & Strength
Trend QualitySoftening
150 DMA Slope+3.2693%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹1.4 Cr13.74% Delivery (Day-Trading Heavy)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +120.4% (21D vs 200D Avg)Expanding Accumulation Trend
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹18.1 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Healthy

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.0341σ
Universe Rank
#940 of 2259Top 41.61% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-1.69σ
7D Flow TrendNeutral
ARFIN
STAGE 3 • TOPPING
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on ARFIN & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →