ASKAUTOLTD
ASK Automotive Limited
Automobile and Auto Components›Auto Components›Auto Components & Equipments
Current Price₹587.15(+2.1%)
Market Cap₹11,575 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
6/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)20th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuations✗ Demanding
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✓ Strong
Stage 239 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

ASK Automotive Limited (ASKAUTOLTD)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, ASK Automotive Limited is maintaining a stable earnings trajectory, with 20.1% YoY growth in reported PAT to ₹297.3 Cr and a CFO/PAT ratio of 1.01 indicating cash-backed profitability. Historical monitoring signals around industrial margin stress and capex efficiency are currently easing as revenue momentum improves and operating cash flows stabilize. Balance sheet integrity is strong, with D/E at 0.5 and operating cash flows of ₹301.2 Cr providing financial capacity despite 66.2% YoY debt growth. Temporary operational friction—reflected in receivable days rising to 20.9 and a 2.6% operating leverage gap—remains contained, keeping ASK Automotive Limited within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✗New risk trigger: Industrial Margin Stress (+12 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is strong
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (-0.23σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -8.3% this quarter (from ₹640.1 on 30 Sept to ₹587.15)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Industrial Margin Stress and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 6.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH94/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION44/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹587.15(+2.1%)
1M Divergence-3.03%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+6.24%-1.46%+7.7%
1 Month-9.72%-6.69%-3.03%
6 Months+33.46%+6.82%+26.64%
1 Year+20.18%+8.93%+11.26%
2 Year+42.06%+47.64%-5.58%
3 Year+100.23%+125.5%-25.27%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score6 / 100Riskier than 20% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in growth sustainability. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+6.0 pts
Final Composite Risk6 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 6 over 13 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWIndustrial Margin Stress
+12 pts
NEWOperating Leverage Stress
+4.5 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin Stress
HIGHAccelerating
■Operating Leverage Stress
MEDIUMAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Capex Efficiency Stress (Q2-FY26)✓ Inventory Stress (Q2-FY26)✓ Working Capital Expansion (Q4-FY25)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Industrial Margin Stress is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (6)Free Preview (2 of 6)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 2 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
10.8%↓ 11 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 8.6%
Empirical Trigger

ASKAUTOLTD: Raw material costs consumed an additional 9.0% of revenue YoY.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+2.6%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 8.6%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 6 Forensic Signals (4 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 6 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for ASK Automotive Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for ASK Automotive Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Automobile and Auto Components (n=94 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Automobile and Auto Components(n=94 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 20th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
18/100
Base
13/100
8/100
3/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
6/100
11/100
6/100
1/100
6/100
LATEST
1➔6/100
▲5-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new Industrial Margin Stress (+12.0 pts) and new Operating Leverage Stress (+4.5 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base1Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+16.52 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-7.5 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-4 pts).
-11.5Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal6+5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+12 pts
Growth Sustainability·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:8.3% → 8.4%Revenue YoY:+52.1%
+4.5 pts
Growth Sustainability·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Operating expense growth outpaced revenue growth, breaching operating leverage stress threshold.
Revenue YoY:+52.1%Op. Expenses YoY:+54.2%Operating Margin:8.3% → 8.4%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+10 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(4)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░40th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for ASK Automotive Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
13.1%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
20 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.50x
Deteriorating↑
Revenue Trend
₹4,196 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
Revenue4,1963,6133,0052,5552,013+18%
growth % YoY+16.2%+20.2%+17.6%+26.9%——
EBITDA551444311242177+32%
margin %13.1%12.3%10.4%9.5%8.8%—
Net Profit29724817412383+34%
margin %7.1%6.9%5.8%4.8%4.1%—
CFO301360303139144+29%
CFO / Net Profit1.01x1.45x1.75x1.13x1.73x—
Debt654393343328175+26%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·8 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivable–Revenue Divergence: +38.9 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)Inventory–Revenue Divergence: +18.3 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)
Cash Conversion Cycle
20 days+6d YoY
Receivables:+6d
Inventory:+4d
Payables:+4d
Net Working Capital
₹237 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 17 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-4 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-324 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -0.17% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
302195214—————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
309230177—————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
375286248—————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
237139143—————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
5.6%3.9%4.8%—————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
20d14d17d—————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
26d20d26d—————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
27d23d21d—————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
33d29d30d—————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+38.9%-29.1%——————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+18.3%+9.8%——————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+16.7%+2.4%+4.8%-11.1%-10.4%+11.6%-1.6%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-4-113-130-16-61-30-140-62
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-0.2%-6.5%-9.1%-1.3%-6.0%-3.3%-15.2%-6.4%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
77.5%112.2%142.1%60.2%86.7%73.1%117.1%77.9%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
10.7%6.2%8.3%—————
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Promoter holding down 10.05 pp across 12 quarters — requires monitoring
Promoter holding 74.95% (−10.05 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 21.05%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.41 ppDII +0.17 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.58 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.58 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (74.95%)
FII (9.91%)
DII (11.14%)
Public (4.00%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹587, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 23.5% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 23.5%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR23.5%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR18.0%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+5.5%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk72/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (25%)
Historical (18.0%)
Market (23.5%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing ASKAUTOLTD for 23.5% implied revenue growth versus 18.0% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
18.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
8.4% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-11.3% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
25/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-1.58% (Weak)
Sector Premium+45% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)23.5%18.0%Demanding
Operating Margin (EBIT)8.9%8.4%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion-43.8%-11.3%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
STRONG UPTRENDBREAKOUT & MOMENTUM
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
81%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the constructive trend as momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
81%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions39 Sessions
Transition Probability95% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.7611σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+4.9370%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹2.4 Cr39.71% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 12.5% (21D vs 200D Avg)Steady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹21.2 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.3495σ
Universe Rank
#422 of 2259Top 18.68% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.23σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
ASKAUTOLTD
STAGE 2 • UPTREND
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on ASKAUTOLTD & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →