BATAINDIA
NSEโ†—BSEโ†—Mid Cap
Bata India Limited
Consumer Durablesโ€บFootwear
Current Priceโ‚น660.8(-0.24%)
Market Capโ‚น8,493 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
42/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean โ€ข 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)98th Percentile ยท Sector
Risk ClassModerate Deterioration
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -8 pts
Business๐ŸŸ  Moderate Deterioration
Primary DriverEarnings Quality
Valuationsโ—‹ Balanced
Expectation Gap+96.1%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structureโœ— Weak
Stage 448 sessions

Improving fundamentals and stabilizing technical baseline. Base building process active. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment๐ŸŸกPartial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Bata India Limited (BATAINDIA)โ€ขUpdated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

๐Ÿšจ Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Bata India Limited is experiencing severe operating deterioration, marked by a 59.4% YoY deterioration in reported net profit and a 226 basis point compression in EBIT margins. Profitability is being eroded by structural margin stress, with core operating margins collapsing to 16.15% from 20.47% YoY, while expenses outpaced sales by 66.2%. This margin compression is compounded by operational friction: receivable days increased to 19.8, and operating leverage gaps widened to 20.0, contributing to a 19.4% contraction in operating cash flows to โ‚น594.9 Cr. Despite low interest coverage at 1.11x, earnings quality is stabilizing as the reliance on non-operational items recedes, and working capital pressure is easing.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • โœ“Risk score improved (QoQ change: -8 pts)
  • โœ“Profitability margins pressure eased (Industrial Margin Stress resolved)
  • โœ“Relative Growth Weakness resolved this quarter (15.8 pts)
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ—Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • โœ“Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.72ฯƒ)
  • โœ“Share price is up +6.8% this quarter (from โ‚น618.75 on 30 Sept to โ‚น660.8)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • ๐ŸŸขNo severe forensic red flags active for BATAINDIA
  • ๐ŸŸขRelative Growth Weakness resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • ๐ŸŸขMaintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 13.2 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 11.5 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 10.4 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 6.9 ptsCompetitive Position
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH58/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)48/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION68/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
๐ŸŸก
Profile: MODERATE ร— BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น660.8(-0.24%)
1M Divergence+12.47%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+4.71%-1.46%+6.17%
1 Month+5.78%-6.69%+12.47%
6 Months-8.02%+6.82%-14.85%
1 Year-39.98%+8.93%-48.91%
2 Year-51.5%+47.64%-99.15%
3 Year-56.49%+125.5%-181.99%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score42 / 100Riskier than 98% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Moderate Deterioration
Risk Trend-8 QoQ ยท ImprovingRisk score improved (-8 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Some early signs of pressure are visible. Pressure is receding in profitability and earnings quality. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+13.2 pts
Growth Sustainability
+11.5 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+10.4 pts
Competitive Position
+6.9 pts
Final Composite Risk42 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 โ†’ 42 over 13 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Risk Relief & Attribution Drivers
RESOLVEDRelative Growth Weakness
-15.8 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Sustainability of earnings recovery
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
โœ“ Industrial Margin Stress (Q4-FY26)โœ“ Working Capital Expansion (Q4-FY26)โœ“ Low Interest Coverage (Q4-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (7)Free Preview (2 of 7)

CriticalHigh
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Trend DeteriorationQuarterlyActive for 6 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
4.5%Sec 13.0%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineSec Median: 13.0%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (13.0%).

Forensic Implication

Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
16.2%โ†“ 432 bps
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 8.6%
Empirical Trigger

BATAINDIA: EBITDA margin compressed by 4.3 bps YoY.

Forensic Implication

Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
๐Ÿ”’
โญ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 7 Forensic Signals (5 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 7 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Bata India Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free โ†’๐ŸŽ 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Bata India Limited.

Upgrade to PROView All Plans
Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Consumer Durables (n=97 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Consumer Durables(n=97 peers)
Median Risk: 15/100Position: 98th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

โ† Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
5/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
35/100
BREAK
35/100
30/100
50/100
42/100
RECOVERYLATEST
50โž”42/100
โ–ผ8-point improvement(Q4 FY26 โž” Q1 FY27)
Structural Recovery Quarter
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved notably (-8.0 pts), driven by Relative Growth Weakness (-15.8 pts) and Working Capital Expansion (-14.8 pts).

Reconciliation Bridgeยท Swipe โž”
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base50Q4 FY26
โž”
+ New Stress00 flags
โž”
- Resolved-60.45 flags cleared
โž”
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (+10.4 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+42 pts).
+52.4Pillar Cap & Drift
โž”
Terminal42-8 net ยท Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter5 Active Catalysts
Normalized & Resolved (5 Flags)
-15.8 pts
Competitive PositionยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Underlying risk metrics normalized below Flagium's systematic alert threshold.
Revenue YoY:+4.0%PAT YoY:+23.0%
-14.8 pts
Balance Sheet StressยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Trade debtor collections accelerated, reducing receivables-to-revenue divergence.
Revenue YoY:+4.0%
-13.5 pts
Growth SustainabilityยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Operating margins stabilized or expanded, easing profitability compression below risk threshold.
Operating Margin:3.8% โ†’ 8.6%Revenue YoY:+4.0%
-9.6 pts
Balance Sheet StressยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Operating earnings expanded relative to finance costs, lifting debt service coverage.
Interest Coverage:0.9x โ†’ 2.6x
-6.7 pts
Earnings QualityยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Net profit rebounded or base-effect losses normalized, clearing the profit contraction threshold.
PAT YoY:+23.0%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress-20 pts
Q4 FY26: 20โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position-15 pts
Q4 FY26: 15โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality-5 pts
Q4 FY26: 5โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Governanceโ€”
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability-10 pts
Q4 FY26: 10โ†’Q1 FY27: 0
Solvencyโ€”
Q4 FY26: 0โ†’Q1 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK โ€” Q1 FY2615 โ†’ 35 | +20 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+20.0 pts), driven by new Profit Collapse (+5.4 pts) and new Industrial Margin Stress (+2.6 pts), partially offset by Working Capital Expansion relief (-12.0 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
โ€ขNew Forensic Triggers: 2 new risk signals emerged: Profit Collapse, Industrial Margin Stress
โ€ขOperating Leverage Stress Escalation: Severity escalated from MEDIUM to HIGH
โ€ขPAT YoY: -70.1%
โ€ขOperating Margin: 7.7% โ†’ 7.8%
STRUCTURAL RECOVERY โ€” Q1 FY2750 โ†’ 42 | -8 pts

Risk improved notably (-8.0 pts), driven by Relative Growth Weakness (-15.8 pts) and Working Capital Expansion (-14.8 pts).

Recovery Trajectory Shifts:
โ€ขResolved Forensic Flags: 5 risk signals extinguished: Relative Growth Weakness, Working Capital Expansion, Industrial Margin Stress
โ€ขRevenue YoY: +4.0%
โ€ขPAT YoY: +23.0%
โ€ขOperating Margin: 3.8% โ†’ 8.6%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: HEALTHY
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(1.2)Weakโ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘12th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(4.8)Weakโ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘48th %ile
Competitive Position(5.4)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘54th %ile
Growth Sustainability(-1.5)Weakโ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘-15th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (15).
ALPINETEXLowest Risk
Alpine Texworld Limited
0STABLE
Sector %ile0th
Delta0
Active Flags0
Accel+0
Governance

Stable

ARCHIDPLY
Archidply Industries Limited
1STABLE
Sector %ile9th
Delta-5
Active Flags18
Accel+0
Earnings Quality

Stable

ALLTIME
All Time Plastics Limited
20WATCH
Sector %ile63th
Delta-5
Active Flags7
Accel+0
Growth Sustainability

Watch

AMBER
Amber Enterprises India Limited
29MODERATE
Sector %ile78th
Delta+4
Active Flags21
Accel+1
Governance

Watch

BAJAJELECHighest Risk
Bajaj Electricals Limited
33MODERATE
Sector %ile77th
Delta-8
Active Flags30
Accel+0
Growth Sustainability

Watch

BATAINDIA
Bata India Limited
42MODERATE
Sector %ile98th
Delta-8
Active Flags7
Accel+0
Earnings Quality

Moderate Deterioration

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Bata India Limited.

Upgrade to PROView All Plans

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited ยท Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
20.5%
Weakeningโ†“
Cash Conversion (CCC)
57 Days
Weakeningโ†“
Debt / Equity Ratio
Zero Debt
Stableโ†”
Revenue Trend
โ‚น3,595 Cr
Growingโ†‘
Swipe for all periods โ‡†
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggersโ€“โ€“โ€“
Revenue3,5953,5543,5403,4902,444+1%
growth % YoY+1.1%+0.4%+1.4%+42.8%โ€”โ€”
EBITDA737926807832474-4%
margin %20.5%26.1%22.8%23.9%19.4%โ€”
Net Profit134331263323103-25%
margin %3.7%9.3%7.4%9.3%4.2%โ€”
CFO595738453629212-2%
CFO / Net Profit4.43x2.23x1.73x1.95x2.05xโ€”
Debtโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosuresยท10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivableโ€“Revenue Divergence: +63.6 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)
Cash Conversion Cycle
57 days-2d YoY
Receivables:+8d
Inventory:-12d
Payables:-2d
Net Working Capital
โ‚น561 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 62 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
โ‚น-461 Cr
PAT โˆ’ CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: โ‚น-1,474 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -12.12% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(โ‚น Cr)
1841128083โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventories(โ‚น Cr)
708815930905โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Trade Payables(โ‚น Cr)
331349300409โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Net Working Capital(โ‚น Cr)
561577710578โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Working Capital / Sales(%)
15.6%16.2%20.1%16.6%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
57d59d73d61dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
19d11d8d9dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
72d84d96d95dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
34d36d31d43dโ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+63.6%+39.1%-4.4%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
-14.3%-12.8%+1.3%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”
Asset Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
-2.3%+13.7%+1.0%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”+4.9%โ€”
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(โ‚น Cr)
-461-407-191-306-109โ€”โ€”โ€”61-98
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-12.1%-11.3%-5.8%-9.3%โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”3.0%-5.1%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
257.4%243.3%115.7%146.3%151.4%โ€”โ€”โ€”44.0%86.8%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

Industry Intelligence

Consumer Durables KPIs
Gross Margin
โ“˜
Q1 FY2027
Current93.9%
QoQ Change+50 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+50 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
โ“˜
Q1 FY2027
Current22.3%
QoQ Change+550 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+30 bpsโ†‘ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Consumer Durables KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More โ†’
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More โ†’
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 50.16% unchanged across 12 quarters ยท zero pledge or encumbrance ยท institutional holding 31.92%
Q2 FY2027 ยท latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.63 ppDII -1.06 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +1.68 pp
FII+DII Net: -1.69 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (50.16%)
FII (5.75%)
DII (26.17%)
Public (17.92%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged โ€” Promoters 50.16% ยท Government 0.00% ยท Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% ยท Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains stable.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Moderate Stress and currently improving. Recent structural triggers in earnings quality suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in operational margins and profitability metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation โ€ข What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of โ‚น661, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 4.5% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 4.5%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth4.5%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery-11.1%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+15.5%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk57/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-13%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (-11.1%)
Market (4.5%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing BATAINDIA for 4.5% long-term growth versus -11.1% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-11.1% CAGR
โœ— Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
8.7% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
179.4% Conv
โœ“ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
50/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“Weak historical delivery
โœ“Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support6.23% (Strong)
Sector Premium-36% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)4.5%-11.1%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)6.7%8.7%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion218.5%179.4%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration and stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
9%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
โœ—RS continues to lag the market
โœ“Institutional flow has improved
โœ“Momentum remains positive
Summary
๐ŸŸกPartial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
9%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions48 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.5590ฯƒ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-2.0981%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
โ‚น4.5 Cr30.06% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
โ–ผ 24.1% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in โ‚น Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
โ‚น23.5 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (โ‰ฅโ‚น100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (โ‚น50โ€“โ‚น100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<โ‚น50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (โ‰ฅ1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.1173ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#697 of 2259Top 30.85% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
+0.72ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
BATAINDIA
STAGE 4 โ€ข DECLINE
โ€”
C:โ€”
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

๐Ÿ“ฌ Flagium Risk Brief โ€” Track forensic risks on BATAINDIA & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue โ†’