CMLL
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap
Caliber Mining and Logistics Limited
Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels›Thermal Coal
Current Price₹517.4(+0.18%)
Market Cap₹3,383 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
5/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)6th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuations○ Balanced
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 136 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Caliber Mining and Logistics Limited (CMLL)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, Caliber Mining and Logistics Limited (CMLL) reports a 19.7% YoY growth in reported net profit to ₹158.0 Cr, supported by strong operating cash flows of ₹411.0 Cr and a CFO/PAT ratio of 2.6. Historical monitoring signals around cash flow conversion and short-term liquidity are currently easing, reflecting stabilizing earnings quality. Balance sheet integrity is maintained, with total debt rising to ₹1,120.0 Cr from a nominal base, supported by a D/E ratio of 1.73. Temporary liquidity stress—evidenced by a declining quick ratio and near-term reliance on cash flow—remains contained, keeping CMLL within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✗New risk trigger: Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.60σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -2.8% this quarter (from ₹532.05 on 30 Sept to ₹517.4)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 2 active forensic warning flags for structural stress
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 3.3 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 1.7 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH95/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION35/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹517.4(+0.18%)
1M Divergence+5.28%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-2.3%-1.46%-0.84%
1 Month-1.41%-6.69%+5.28%
6 MonthsN/A+6.82%N/A
1 YearN/A+8.93%N/A
2 Year-6.96%+47.64%-54.6%
3 Year-6.96%+125.5%-132.46%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score5 / 100Riskier than 6% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile is stable with manageable leverage. Weakness is detected in growth sustainability. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+3.3 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+1.7 pts
Final Composite Risk5 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 5 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWIndustrial Margin Stress
+10.8 pts
NEWLow Interest Coverage
+5.1 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Interest coverage ratio

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin Stress
SEVEREAccelerating
Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
MEDIUMAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ CFO-EBITDA Divergence (FY2026)✓ Short-Term Liquidity Stress (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin StressSEVERE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Industrial Margin Stress is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (4)Free Preview (2 of 4)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
12.8%↓ 1851 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline3-Qtr Median: 24.2%
Empirical Trigger

CMLL: EBITDA margin compressed by 1851 bps YoY.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[F4]Low Interest Coverage
Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CoverageCritical Tier
2.41xEBIT ₹67.5 Cr
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineSolvency Floor: 2.50x
Empirical Trigger

CMLL: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41x in FY2027 Q1 (Threshold: 2.5x).

Forensic Implication

Earnings buffer for interest payments is narrowing. Monitor for margin pressure.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 4 Forensic Signals (2 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 4 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Caliber Mining and Logistics Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Caliber Mining and Logistics Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels (n=35 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels(n=35 peers)
Median Risk: 14/100Position: 6th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
LATEST
0➔5/100
▲5-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts) and new Low Interest Coverage (+5.1 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base0Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+15.92 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-0.9 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-10 pts).
-10.9Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal5+5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+10.8 pts
Growth Sustainability·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:28.0% → 5.9%Revenue YoY:+67.7%
+5.1 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Finance costs elevated relative to operating profit, narrowing interest coverage headroom.
Interest Coverage:6.4x → 1.4x
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+5.1 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 5.1
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+10 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(9.2)Excellent★★★★★
█████92th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(6.7)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░67th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (14).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Caliber Mining and Logistics Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
26.0%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
₹411 Cr
Improving↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
1.73x
Rising↑
Revenue Trend
₹1,678 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue1,6781,430953865485+25%
growth % YoY+17.3%+50.1%+10.2%+78.4%——
EBITDA43735525019493+31%
margin %26.0%24.8%26.2%22.4%19.2%—
Net Profit158132968037+25%
margin %9.4%9.2%10.1%9.2%7.6%—
CFO411—489053+66%
CFO / Net Profit2.60x—0.50x1.13x1.43x—
Debt1,120—840406251+40%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·7 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
—
Receivables:—
Inventory:—
Payables:—
Net Working Capital
—
Receivables + Inv − Payables
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-253 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-231 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -12.18% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
———————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
———————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
———————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
———————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
———————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
———————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
———————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
———————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
———————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
——+69.5%-11.6%-57.4%+94.1%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-253—48-10-1627-24
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-12.2%—4.8%-1.8%-5.1%17.2%-21.1%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
93.8%—19.4%48.9%61.6%-26.7%153.3%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
———————

Industry Intelligence

Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current99.9%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change—
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current17.1%
QoQ Change-1070 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-710 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor1QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 74.18% unchanged across 1 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 11.96%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (74.18%)
FII (1.11%)
DII (10.85%)
Public (13.86%)
Quarterly Progression
7 unchanged — Promoters 74.18% · FII / FPI 1.11% · DII (MFs/Ins) 10.85% · Government 0.00% · Public & Retail 13.86% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 1 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹517, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 27.6% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 27.6%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR27.6%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR20.0%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+7.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk63/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (30%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (27.6%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing CMLL for 27.6% implied revenue growth versus 20.0% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
25.5% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-59.9% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-6.62% (Weak)
Sector Premium+21% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)27.6%20.0%Demanding
Operating Margin (EBIT)26.1%25.5%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion-51.1%-59.9%Demanding

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
14%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowNeutral
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Institutional participation remains distribution, while trend quality stays an early-stage base and momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
○Long-term trend vs 150DMA is unavailable
○Long-term trend vs 200DMA is unavailable
✓RS continues to lead the market
○Institutional flow remains neutral
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
14%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions36 Sessions
Transition Probability12% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.0000σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityEarly Base
150 DMA SlopeN/A
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹1.9 Cr29.94% Delivery (Day-Trading Heavy)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 32.6% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.0022σ
Universe Rank
#875 of 2259Top 38.73% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.60σ
7D Flow TrendNeutral
CMLL
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on CMLL & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →