DYNPRO
NSE↗BSE↗Micro Cap
Dynemic Products Limited
Basic Materials›Specialty Chemicals
Current Price₹233.04(+3.63%)
Market Cap₹290 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
0/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)0th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
StableQoQ Delta 0 pts
Business🟢 Stable
No Active Flags
Valuations✓ Conservative
Expectation Gap+117.5%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structure○ Topping
Stage 35 sessions

Improving fundamentals and stabilizing technical baseline. Base building process active. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Dynemic Products Limited (DYNPRO)•Updated yesterday

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: 0 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✓Growth expectations are conservative
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.80σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +4.2% this quarter (from ₹223.58 on 30 Sept to ₹233.04)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for DYNPRO
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 0 ptsClean Profile (Zero Penalties)
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH100/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)52/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION30/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟢
Profile: STRONG × ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹233.04(+3.63%)
1M Divergence+10.4%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-2.51%-1.46%-1.04%
1 Month+3.71%-6.69%+10.4%
6 Months+5.13%+6.82%-1.69%
1 Year-24.38%+8.93%-33.31%
2 Year-41.51%+47.64%-89.16%
3 Year-24.9%+125.5%-150.4%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score0 / 100Riskier than 0% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend0 QoQ · StableNo change in risk score
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure has stabilized in profitability and earnings quality. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. No major change in risk trend.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
No active forensic penalties contributing.
Final Composite Risk0 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has remained stable (0 → 0) over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
STABLE
Primary Risk Drivers
Zero active risk triggers detected
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ CFO-EBITDA Divergence (FY2025)✓ Low Interest Coverage (Q4-FY24)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (2)

CriticalHigh
[F12]CFO-EBITDA Divergence
Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 1 Year
Framework: Statutory Annual
CFO / EBITDAHigh Tier
0.62xCFO +0.0%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

DYNPRO: Low CFO/EBITDA conversion (0.62x) in FY2025 (EBITDA growth: +50.0%, CFO growth: +0.0%).

Forensic Implication

Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: FY2025
[F4]Low Interest Coverage
Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CoverageCritical Tier
1.87xEBIT ₹6.8 Cr
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineSolvency Floor: 2.50x
Empirical Trigger

DYNPRO: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.87x in FY2024 Q4 (Threshold: 2.5x).

Forensic Implication

The ability to cover interest is strengthening as earnings improve or debt is retired.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2024

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Dynemic Products Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Basic Materials (n=49 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Basic Materials(n=49 peers)
Median Risk: 11/100Position: 0th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
LATEST
0➔0/100
■0-point change(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk profile remained stable this quarter, with no new forensic alarms or critical threshold escalations detected.

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base0Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (0 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
0Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal00 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter0 Active Catalysts
✓
Pristine Baseline StabilityZero Forensic Anomalies or Alarms Fired in Q1 FY27
Clean State
New Alarms0
Net Delta0 pts
Risk ClassLow Risk
↳All 6 fundamental pillars operated within established safety parameters. No individual indicator transitions or severity shifts occurred during this period.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (11).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Dynemic Products Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
14.0%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
87 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.30x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹379 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
Revenue379368284296252+9%
growth % YoY+3.0%+29.6%−4.1%+17.5%——
EBITDA53.047.033.029.042.0+22%
margin %14.0%12.8%11.6%9.8%16.7%—
Net Profit20.015.04.0(3.0)14.0n/m
margin %5.3%4.1%1.4%-1.0%5.6%—
CFO34.030.030.025.040.0+11%
CFO / Net Profit1.70x2.00x7.50x-8.33x2.86x—
Debt7396115148174-21%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2024 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
87 days+17d YoY
Receivables:+9d
Inventory:-2d
Payables:-10d
Net Working Capital
₹91 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 97 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-14 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-109 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -3.37% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
76655651474132423228
Inventories(₹ Cr)
82826665523636272722
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
6776686252248563
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
91715454475360645347
Working Capital / Sales(%)
24.0%19.3%19.0%18.2%18.7%25.7%33.0%38.3%32.3%36.4%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
87d70d70d67d68d94d120d140d118d133d
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
73d64d72d63d68d73d64d92d71d79d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
79d81d85d80d75d64d72d59d60d62d
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
65d75d87d76d75d43d16d11d13d8d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+13.9%-13.5%+13.9%-8.9%-7.7%+14.9%-32.8%+29.4%-12.8%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-3.0%-5.3%+5.6%+7.5%+22.1%-13.2%+24.4%-1.8%-4.4%—
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-4.2%-25.1%+1.1%-18.2%-4.1%+26.7%+49.9%+11.0%-10.5%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-14-15-26-28-26-2017582
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-3.4%-3.7%-6.4%-6.8%-6.8%-6.6%8.3%3.4%6.2%1.7%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
65.4%62.5%93.8%86.2%93.0%111.6%19.4%43.3%32.3%48.0%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%85.1%66.4%39.7%28.6%22.2%

Industry Intelligence

Basic Materials KPIs
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current14.6%
QoQ Change+40 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+100 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Basic Materials KPIs

EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 29.42% unchanged across 12 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.02 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +0.03 pp
FII+DII Net: -0.02 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (29.42%)
FII (0.02%)
DII (0.31%)
Public (70.26%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 29.42% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹233, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by -1.2% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than -1.2%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth-1.2%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery12.1%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap-13.3%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk15/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (12.1%)
Market (-1.2%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing DYNPRO for -1.2% long-term growth versus 12.1% historical delivery. Current expectations appear achievable, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
12.1% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
12.7% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
64.7% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support10.70% (Strong)
Sector Premium-33% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)-1.2%12.1%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)14.0%12.7%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion59.9%64.7%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
51%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Institutional participation has also deteriorated, compounding the weakening trend as momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✗Institutional flow has deteriorated
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
51%
Readiness LabelModerate (Transition Potential Building)
Regime Sessions5 Sessions
Transition Probability51% Moderate
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.6659σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityNeutral
150 DMA Slope+0.6062%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹0.1 Cr61.94% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +3.8% (21D vs 200D Avg)Above-Average Accumulation
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0.5 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.0603σ
Universe Rank
#782 of 2259Top 34.62% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.80σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
DYNPRO
STAGE 3 • TOPPING
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on DYNPRO & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →