GOACARBON
NSE↗BSE↗Micro Cap
Goa Carbon
Basic Materials›Specialty Chemicals
Current Price₹406.1(+1.01%)
Market Cap₹372 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
35/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)93rd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +35 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverReceivables-Revenue Divergence
Valuations✓ Conservative
Expectation Gap+203.6%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structure✓ Strong
Stage 27 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🔴DivergingPrice structure remains strong despite building fundamental risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Goa Carbon (GOACARBON)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Goa Carbon reported a widening net loss of ₹48.2 Cr compared with a loss of ₹22.0 Cr in the prior year, while revenue grew 36.4% to ₹708.8 Cr. This earnings quality crisis is compounded by severe margin compression: EBIT margins fell to -8.4% from 2.6% YoY, signaling significant cost-push pressure and structural stress. This operating deterioration is reflected in a severe receivables-revenue divergence: receivables grew 211% faster than revenue in Q4 FY26, contributing to a 244% YoY expansion in operating cash flow to ₹77.6 Cr. Against this liquidity strain, total debt rose to ₹167.4 Cr, pushing interest coverage to -0.13x and triggering heightened surveillance.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +35 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✗New risk trigger: Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+13 pts)
  • ✓Growth expectations are conservative
  • ✓Market structure is strong
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.52σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +0.3% this quarter (from ₹404.95 on 30 Sept to ₹406.1)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Low Interest Coverage and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 9.7 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 7.7 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 8.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH65/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)53/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION63/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟢
Profile: MODERATE × ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹406.1(+1.01%)
1M Divergence+6.78%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+1.72%-1.46%+3.18%
1 Month+0.09%-6.69%+6.78%
6 Months+9.55%+6.82%+2.73%
1 Year-11.24%+8.93%-20.17%
2 Year-41.29%+47.64%-88.93%
3 Year-18.12%+125.5%-143.62%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score35 / 100Riskier than 93% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend+35 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+35 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in growth sustainability. This suggests a building risk profile. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Earnings Quality
+9.7 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+7.7 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+8.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk35 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 35 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
ESCALATING RISK
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWReceivables-Revenue Divergence
+13 pts
NEWIndustrial Margin Stress
+10.8 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Interest coverage ratio

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Receivables-Revenue Divergence
SEVEREAccelerating
■Industrial Margin Stress
SEVEREAccelerating
Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
HIGHAccelerating

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Receivables-Revenue DivergenceSEVERE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Working capital cycles are stretching, led by receivables-revenue divergence. This delays cash generation from core operations and locks up liquidity.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[F11]Receivables-Revenue Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rec DivergenceHigh Tier
+118.5 ppDSRI 1.62x
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

GOACARBON: Trade Receivables growth outpaced Revenue by +118.5 pp (DSRI: 1.62x).

Forensic Implication

Early signs of slowing collections. Monitor for pressure on the cash flow cycle.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
-8.4%↓ 1102 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: -6.0%
Empirical Trigger

GOACARBON: EBITDA margin compressed by 11.0 bps YoY.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Goa Carbon.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Goa Carbon.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceLow
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Basic Materials (n=49 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Basic Materials(n=49 peers)
Median Risk: 11/100Position: 93th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
35/100
BREAKLATEST
0➔35/100
▲35-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Structural Break Quarter
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated materially (+35.0 pts), driven by new Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+13.0 pts) and new Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base0Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+31.53 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-4.5 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+8 pts).
+3.5Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal35+35 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter3 Active Catalysts
New Stress (3 Flags)
+13 pts
Earnings Quality·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Accounts receivable outgrew top-line sales, extending cash conversion cycles.
Revenue YoY:-65.1%
+10.8 pts
Growth Sustainability·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:2.3% → -9.4%Revenue YoY:-65.1%
+7.7 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Finance costs elevated relative to operating profit, narrowing interest coverage headroom.
Interest Coverage:0.8x → -1.1x
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+7.7 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 7.7
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality+9.7 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 9.7
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+10 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q1 FY270 → 35 | +35 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+35.0 pts), driven by new Receivables-Revenue Divergence (+13.0 pts) and new Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 3 new risk signals emerged: Receivables-Revenue Divergence, Industrial Margin Stress, Low Interest Coverage
•Revenue YoY: -65.1%
•Operating Margin: 2.3% → -9.4%
•Interest Coverage: 0.8x → -1.1x

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: HEALTHY
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(3.5)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░35th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(6.2)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░62th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (11).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Goa Carbon.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Standalone
Operating Margin (OPM)
-2.2%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
100 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.99x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹709 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––––
Revenue7095201,0711,377769-20%
growth % YoY+36.4%−51.5%−22.2%+79.1%——
EBITDA(16)(7)14215759n/m
margin %-2.2%-1.4%13.3%11.4%7.7%—
Net Profit(48.2)(22.0)85.580.837.8n/m
margin %-6.8%-4.2%8.0%5.9%4.9%—
CFO78(54)196(362)(40)n/m
CFO / Net Profit-1.61x2.45x2.29x-4.49x-1.06x—
Debt167281334422—-27%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2027 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·8 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivable–Revenue Divergence: +58.3 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)
Cash Conversion Cycle
100 days-99d YoY
Receivables:+19d
Inventory:-119d
Payables:-1d
Net Working Capital
₹196 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 120 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-126 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹316 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -27.94% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
1296661155————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
90235218328————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
231815143————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
196283264340————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
27.6%54.5%24.6%24.7%————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
100d199d90d90d————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
66d47d21d41d————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
46d165d74d87d————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
12d13d5d38d————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+58.3%+60.6%-38.6%—————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-98.2%+59.2%-11.2%—————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-66.7%+38.1%+2.0%—————
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-12632-11144378———
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-27.9%5.6%-16.0%57.6%————
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
——169.5%-334.8%-97.5%———
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
————————

Industry Intelligence

Basic Materials KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current33.5%
QoQ Change+1600 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+4620 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median48.5%

Understanding Basic Materials KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 59.72% unchanged across 12 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.38 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.38 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.38 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (59.72%)
FII (0.38%)
DII (0.02%)
Public (39.88%)
Quarterly Progression
5 unchanged — Promoters 59.72% · DII (MFs/Ins) 0.02% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains stable.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently deteriorating. Recent structural triggers in growth sustainability suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in core structural metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹406, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by -4.6% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than -4.6%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth-4.6%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery15.2%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap-19.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk21/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (15.2%)
Market (-4.6%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing GOACARBON for -4.6% long-term growth versus 15.2% historical delivery. Current expectations appear achievable, and historical fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
15.2% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
-0.2% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
168.4% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support19.23% (Strong)
Sector PremiumN/A
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)-4.6%15.2%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)-6.4%-0.2%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion19.4%168.4%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
STRONG UPTRENDBREAKOUT & MOMENTUM
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
86%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the constructive trend as momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🔴Diverging

Price structure remains strong despite building fundamental risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
86%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions7 Sessions
Transition Probability83% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.8318σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+2.4725%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹0.2 Cr67.36% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 30.5% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹1.3 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.2711σ
Universe Rank
#497 of 2259Top 22.00% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+0.52σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
GOACARBON
STAGE 2 • UPTREND
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on GOACARBON & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →