HPAL
NSE↗BSE↗Micro Cap
Hp Adhesives
Basic Materials›Specialty Chemicals
Current Price₹32.99(+1.66%)
Market Cap₹303 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
35/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)93rd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +35 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuations✗ Demanding
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 422 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Hp Adhesives (HPAL)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Hp Adhesives is experiencing severe earnings quality deterioration, marked by a 61.8% YoY decline in reported net profit to ₹7.0 Cr from ₹18.2 Cr, compounded by a 28.8% contraction in operating cash flow to ₹7.1 Cr. Profitability is under severe structural strain, with EBIT margins collapsing to -0.12% from -6.45% YoY, signaling significant cost-push pressure and negative operating leverage. This operating deterioration is driven by a 17.2% operating leverage gap and a 633 basis point decline in margins, while interest coverage has plummeted to -0.68x, putting the company at severe risk of default. Against this liquidity strain, total debt expanded to ₹3.3 Cr, pushing the firm into Flagium’s heightened surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +35 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✗New risk trigger: Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.76σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -2.5% this quarter (from ₹33.83 on 30 Sept to ₹32.99)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Low Interest Coverage and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 7.7 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 2.3 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 15.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH65/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)50/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION69/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: MODERATE × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹32.99(+1.66%)
1M Divergence+1.57%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+1.54%-1.46%+3%
1 Month-5.12%-6.69%+1.57%
6 Months-12.33%+6.82%-19.15%
1 Year-28.72%+8.93%-37.64%
2 Year-58.92%+47.64%-106.56%
3 Year-63.83%+125.5%-189.32%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score35 / 100Riskier than 93% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend+35 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+35 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in growth sustainability. This suggests a building risk profile. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+7.7 pts
Earnings Quality
+2.3 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+15.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk35 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 35 over 13 quarters.

Expected Direction
ESCALATING RISK
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWIndustrial Margin Stress
+10.8 pts
NEWLow Interest Coverage
+7.7 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Interest coverage ratio

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin Stress
SEVEREAccelerating
■Profit Collapse
HIGHAccelerating
Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
HIGHAccelerating

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Industrial Margin StressSEVERE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Industrial Margin Stress is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (4)Free Preview (2 of 4)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
-0.1%↑ 633 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline9-Qtr Median: 8.0%
Empirical Trigger

HPAL: Raw material costs consumed an additional 9.9% of revenue YoY.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+17.2%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline9-Qtr Median: 8.0%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 4 Forensic Signals (2 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 4 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Hp Adhesives.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Hp Adhesives.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceLow
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Basic Materials (n=49 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Basic Materials(n=49 peers)
Median Risk: 11/100Position: 93th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
35/100
BREAKLATEST
0➔35/100
▲35-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Structural Break Quarter
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated materially (+35.0 pts), driven by new Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts) and new Low Interest Coverage (+7.7 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base0Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+28.34 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-8.3 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+15 pts).
+6.7Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal35+35 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter4 Active Catalysts
New Stress (4 Flags)
+10.8 pts
Growth Sustainability·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:-8.9% → -2.1%Revenue YoY:-4.1%
+7.7 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Finance costs elevated relative to operating profit, narrowing interest coverage headroom.
Interest Coverage:-7.0x → -1.7x
+6.7 pts
Growth Sustainability·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Operating expense growth outpaced revenue growth, breaching operating leverage stress threshold.
Revenue YoY:-4.1%Op. Expenses YoY:+6.8%Operating Margin:-8.9% → -2.1%
+3.1 pts
Earnings Quality·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Net profit experienced severe contraction, triggering earnings distress alert.
PAT YoY:to loss (N/M)
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+7.7 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 7.7
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality+2.3 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 2.3
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+10 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q1 FY270 → 35 | +35 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+35.0 pts), driven by new Industrial Margin Stress (+10.8 pts) and new Low Interest Coverage (+7.7 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 4 new risk signals emerged: Industrial Margin Stress, Low Interest Coverage, Operating Leverage Stress
•Operating Margin: -8.9% → -2.1%
•Revenue YoY: -4.1%
•Interest Coverage: -7.0x → -1.7x

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: HEALTHY
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(8.5)Good★★★★☆
████░85th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(6.2)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░62th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (11).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Hp Adhesives.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
6.3%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
87 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.02x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹253 Cr
Weakening↓
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025
Structural triggers––
Revenue253257
growth % YoY−1.8%—
EBITDA15.930.6
margin %6.3%11.9%
Net Profit7.018.2
margin %2.8%7.1%
CFO7.089.94
CFO / Net Profit1.01x0.54x
Debt3.265.69
Structural triggers first appear in FY2027 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·2 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
87 days-19d YoY
Receivables:-5d
Inventory:-7d
Payables:+7d
Net Working Capital
₹60 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 96 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹0 Cr
PAT − CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: ₹8 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -0.04% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
3742
Inventories(₹ Cr)
5156
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
2823
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
6075
Working Capital / Sales(%)
23.8%29.2%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
87d106d
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
54d59d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
73d80d
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
40d33d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-9.0%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-8.8%—
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+3.5%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
08
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-0.0%3.6%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
86.5%41.9%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
——

Industry Intelligence

Basic Materials KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current43.8%
QoQ Change-990 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-1340 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median48.5%
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current1.1%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change-1020 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Basic Materials KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 71.35% unchanged across 12 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 0.01%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII 0 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic 0 pp
FII+DII Net: 0 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (71.35%)
FII (0.01%)
DII (0.00%)
Public (28.64%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 71.35% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains stable.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently deteriorating. Recent structural triggers in growth sustainability suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in core structural metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹33, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 4.9% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 4.9%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR4.9%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR2.3%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+2.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk78/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (2.3%)
Market (4.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing HPAL for 4.9% implied revenue growth versus 2.3% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear elevated, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
2.3% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
8.0% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-21.6% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
25/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-1.90% (Weak)
Sector Premium+234% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)4.9%2.3%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)0.5%8.0%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion-456.7%-21.6%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions22 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.7332σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-0.2073%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹0.1 Cr71.26% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 47.1% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0.3 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.0705σ
Universe Rank
#1017 of 2259Top 45.02% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+0.76σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
HPAL
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on HPAL & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →