INFY
NSE↗BSE↗Large CapNIFTY 50
Infosys Limited
Information Technology›IT - Software›Computers - Software & Consulting
Current Price₹1,123.15(-3.43%)
Market Cap₹4,54,719 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
19/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)56th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverRelative Growth Weakness
Valuations✓ Conservative
Expectation Gap+21.8%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 41 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🔴DivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Infosys Limited (INFY)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
23 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q2 FY2027, Infosys Limited reported a resilient operational trajectory, with 10.2% YoY revenue growth and EBITDA margins compressing by -0.3 pp to 25.0%, supported by steady earnings momentum across recent interim quarters. Reported net profit expanded to ₹7,838.0 Cr compared with ₹7,375.0 Cr in the prior period, despite headline growth being decoupled from earnings quality due to persistent relative growth weakness. This operational momentum remains anchored by balance sheet strength from FY2026, where an audited CFO/PAT ratio of 1.15x (₹33,986.0 Cr operating cash flow) and zero debt comfortably absorb working capital requirements, maintaining the company firmly within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗New risk trigger: Operating Leverage Stress (+6.4 pts)
  • ✓Growth expectations are conservative
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (3.32σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +13.0% this quarter (from ₹994.1 on 30 Sept to ₹1,123.15)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 2 active forensic warning flags for structural stress
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 13.1 ptsCompetitive Position
  • 5.9 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH81/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)51/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION100/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟢
Profile: STRONG × ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹1,123.15(-3.43%)
1M Divergence+10.99%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-3.84%-1.9%-1.94%
1 Month+11.96%+0.97%+10.99%
6 Months-2.91%+9.46%-12.37%
1 Year-23.51%-7.18%-16.34%
2 Year-37.3%+3.58%-40.89%
3 Year-13.58%+82.69%-96.27%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score19 / 100Riskier than 56% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in competitive position. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Competitive Position
+13.1 pts
Growth Sustainability
+5.9 pts
Final Composite Risk19 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 19 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWOperating Leverage Stress
+6.4 pts
PERSISTENTRelative Growth Weakness
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Competitive Position
■Relative Growth Weakness
MEDIUMPersistent
Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage Stress
MEDIUMAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2025)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Competitive Position
■Relative Growth WeaknessMEDIUM
Forensic Analyst Insight

Relative growth underperformance indicates the company is losing sales momentum compared to sector peers, signaling potential competitive position pressure.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Trend DeteriorationQuarterlyActive for 6 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
10.2%Sec 15.2%
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineSec Median: 15.2%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (15.2%).

Forensic Implication

Early signs of earnings quality decay. Profitability is being driven by non-core items.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Operating MarginHigh Tier
22.1%↓ 30 bps
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 22.5%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Infosys Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Infosys Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Information Technology (n=109 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Information Technology(n=109 peers)
Median Risk: 14/100Position: 56th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
13/100
14/100
14/100
19/100
LATEST
14➔19/100
▲5-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new Operating Leverage Stress (+6.4 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base14Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+6.41 flag
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-0.4 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-1 pts).
-1.4Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal19+5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
New Stress (1 Flag)
+6.4 pts
Growth Sustainability·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Operating expense growth outpaced revenue growth, breaching operating leverage stress threshold.
Revenue YoY:+10.2%Op. Expenses YoY:+10.7%Operating Margin:22.4% → 22.1%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 14.1→Q2 FY27: 14.1
Earnings Quality—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+6.4 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 6.4
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(3.5)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░35th %ile
Growth Sustainability(4.1)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░41th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (14).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Infosys Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
24.8%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
61 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
Zero Debt
Stable↔
Revenue Trend
₹1,82,972 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue182,972166,590158,381149,468123,936+7%
growth % YoY+9.8%+5.2%+6.0%+20.6%——
EBITDA45,31342,83641,13637,83133,786+6%
margin %24.8%25.7%26.0%25.3%27.3%—
Net Profit29,47426,75026,24824,10822,146+7%
margin %16.1%16.1%16.6%16.1%17.9%—
CFO33,98635,69425,21022,46723,885+15%
CFO / Net Profit1.15x1.33x0.96x0.93x1.08x—
Debt——————
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
61 days+2d YoY
Receivables:+2d
Inventory:0d
Payables:0d
Net Working Capital
₹30,490 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 58 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-4,512 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-12,516 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -2.96% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
35,23431,15830,19325,424——————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
0000——————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
4,7444,1643,9563,865——————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
30,49026,99426,23721,559——————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
16.7%16.2%16.6%14.4%——————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
61d59d61d53d——————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
70d68d70d62d——————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
0d0d0d0d——————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
9d9d9d9d——————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+3.2%-2.0%+12.8%———————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
——————————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-5.1%+2.9%+3.6%—————-7.5%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-4,512-8,9441,0381,641-1,739———2,8112,822
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-3.0%-6.2%0.8%1.3%————3.5%3.4%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
82.3%94.9%70.1%67.4%79.3%———70.2%62.0%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
2.7%4.3%1.5%1.4%——————
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 13.90% (−0.88 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 70.29%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.35 ppDII -0.11 ppPromoters +0.08 ppPublic -0.32 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.24 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (13.90%)
FII (27.44%)
DII (42.85%)
Govt (0.02%)
Public (15.57%)
Others (0.22%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.02% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in competitive position remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹1,123, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 3.0% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 3.0%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth3.0%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery7.8%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap-4.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk28/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (7.8%)
Market (3.0%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing INFY for 3.0% long-term growth versus 7.8% historical delivery. Current expectations appear achievable, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
7.8% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
22.6% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
76.2% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
55/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support6.87% (Strong)
Sector Premium-38% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)3.0%7.8%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)22.4%22.6%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion72.0%76.2%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
36%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🔴Diverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
36%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions1 Sessions
Transition Probability1% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.9836σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-2.0498%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹886.7 Cr50.49% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +15.1% (21D vs 200D Avg)Above-Average Accumulation
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹1,545.6 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.1980σ
Universe Rank
#578 of 2259Top 25.59% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+3.32σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
INFY
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on INFY & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →