SAREGAMA
Saregama India Limited
Media Entertainment & Publication›Entertainment›Media & Entertainment
Current Price₹523.95(+2.84%)
Market Cap₹10,058 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
0/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)0th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
No Active Flags
Valuations✗ Demanding
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✓ Strong
Stage 255 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Saregama India Limited (SAREGAMA)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Saregama India Limited reported a 16.5% YoY revenue decline to ₹1,026.9 Cr, compounded by a 1.0% YoY deterioration in reported net profit to ₹206.2 Cr, compared with ₹204.2 Cr in the prior year. Profitability is being eroded by intensifying margin compression, with operating cash flows contracting to ₹100.0 Cr, signaling significant internal cost friction and an elevated risk ranking within the Media Entertainment & Publication sector. This operating deterioration is driven by a cash conversion deficit, as operational cash flow remains below reported profit, with a CFO/PAT ratio of 0.49. Coinciding with this cash flow contraction, total debt rose to ₹70.4 Cr from a nominal base, reducing interest coverage and keeping the company under heightened operational surveillance.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is strong
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (-0.14σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +3.4% this quarter (from ₹506.55 on 30 Sept to ₹523.95)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for SAREGAMA
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 0 ptsClean Profile (Zero Penalties)
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH100/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)43/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION47/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹523.95(+2.84%)
1M Divergence+13.44%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+2.65%-1.37%+4.03%
1 Month+7.02%-6.43%+13.44%
6 Months+52.38%+0.1%+52.28%
1 Year+16.37%-5.02%+21.38%
2 Year+10.96%+35.37%-24.41%
3 Year+59.85%+130.26%-70.41%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score0 / 100Riskier than 0% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in competitive position. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
No active forensic penalties contributing.
Final Composite Risk0 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has declined from 7 → 0 over 14 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Risk Drivers
Zero active risk triggers detected
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Relative Growth Weakness (Q3-FY26)✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (2)

CriticalHigh
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 2 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
-46.4%Sec 11.0%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineSec Median: 11.0%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (11.0%).

Forensic Implication

Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q3 FY2026
[F1]Cash Conversion Deficit
Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 3 Years
Framework: Statutory Annual
PATHigh Tier
₹206 CrOCF ₹100 Cr
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineStatutory Norm: CFO ≥ 80% PAT
Empirical Trigger

SAREGAMA: OCF below Net Profit in 2/3 recent years.

Forensic Implication

Cash conversion has normalized in the latest period. Operational cash flow is back in sync.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: FY2026

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Saregama India Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Media Entertainment & Publication (n=28 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Media Entertainment & Publication(n=28 peers)
Median Risk: 21.5/100Position: 0th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
5/100
0/100
LATEST
5➔0/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by overall risk reduction across core indicators.

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base5Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-5 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
-5Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal0-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter0 Active Catalysts
✓
Pristine Baseline StabilityZero Forensic Anomalies or Alarms Fired in Q1 FY27
Clean State
New Alarms0
Net Delta-5 pts
Risk ClassLow Risk
↳Score improved from 5 to 0/100 as historical baseline stress decayed and fundamental balance sheet health was maintained.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (21.5).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Saregama India Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
36.1%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
94 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.04x
Rising↑
Revenue Trend
₹1,027 Cr
Weakening↓
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue1,0271,229867790616+9%
growth % YoY−16.5%+41.9%+9.7%+28.4%——
EBITDA371340310275222+11%
margin %36.1%27.7%35.8%34.7%36.1%—
Net Profit206204198185153+4%
margin %20.1%16.6%22.8%23.4%24.8%—
CFO100331939394+2%
CFO / Net Profit0.49x1.62x0.47x0.50x0.62x—
Debt70.4—1.7———
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivable–Revenue Divergence: +40.0 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)Inventory–Revenue Divergence: +17.8 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)Operating Cash Realisation Lag: CFO covers only 34.2% of reported EBITDA
Cash Conversion Cycle
94 days+18d YoY
Receivables:+20d
Inventory:+16d
Payables:+18d
Net Working Capital
₹263 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 103 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹106 Cr
PAT − CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: ₹233 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Moderate Accruals
Accruals: 4.81% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
177143159148——————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
243240239164——————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
1581289370——————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
263256305242——————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
25.6%20.8%35.2%30.6%——————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
94d76d129d112d——————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
63d43d67d68d——————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
87d71d101d76d——————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
56d38d39d32d——————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+40.0%-51.6%-2.4%———————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+17.8%-41.5%+36.0%———————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+27.3%-38.8%+9.7%—————-43.3%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
106-1271049258———4713
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
4.8%-6.2%5.6%5.4%————8.9%2.7%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
34.2%122.2%34.4%37.7%46.2%———-52.8%-44.4%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
——————————

Industry Intelligence

Media Entertainment & Publication KPIs
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current36.4%
QoQ Change-710 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change+490 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median15.5%
Asset Turnover
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current0.11x
QoQ Change-15.4%↓ Asset utilization moderating
YoY Change+10.0%↑ Asset efficiency accelerating
Industry Median1.15x

Understanding Media Entertainment & Publication KPIs

EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Asset Turnover: Revenue generated per rupee of asset base. Measures asset efficiency. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 60.84% (+1.75 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 21.24%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.38 ppDII +0.76 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -1.14 pp
FII+DII Net: +1.14 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (60.84%)
FII (11.88%)
DII (9.36%)
Public (17.48%)
Others (0.44%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in competitive position remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹524, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 53.9% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 53.9%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR53.9%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR9.1%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+44.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk100/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (56%)
Historical (9.1%)
Market (53.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing SAREGAMA for 53.9% implied revenue growth versus 9.1% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
9.1% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
27.3% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
8.0% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-1.13% (Weak)
Sector Premium+260% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)53.9%9.1%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)29.1%27.3%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion-36.4%8.0%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
STRONG UPTRENDBREAKOUT & MOMENTUM
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
81%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the constructive trend as momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
81%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions55 Sessions
Transition Probability93% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.2612σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+5.1101%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹23 Cr44.77% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 22.4% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹62.8 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Low Liquidity
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.5738σ
Universe Rank
#274 of 2259Top 12.13% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.14σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
SAREGAMA
STAGE 2 • UPTREND
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on SAREGAMA & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →