SHEMAROO
NSE↗BSE↗Micro Cap
Shemaroo Entertainment Limited
Communication Services›Entertainment
Current Price₹97.96(-1.14%)
Market Cap₹281 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
10/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)25th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverLow Interest Coverage
Valuations○ Balanced
Expectation Gap+9.5%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Topping
Stage 36 sessions

Improving fundamentals and stabilizing technical baseline. Base building process active. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Shemaroo Entertainment Limited (SHEMAROO)•Updated yesterday

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✓Operating Leverage Stress resolved this quarter (12 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (-0.13σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -16.4% this quarter (from ₹117.12 on 30 Sept to ₹97.96)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Low Interest Coverage and balance sheet impact
  • 🟢Operating Leverage Stress resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 7.9 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 2.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH90/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)45/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION47/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹97.96(-1.14%)
1M Divergence-13.05%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-2.07%-1.37%-0.7%
1 Month-19.47%-6.43%-13.05%
6 Months-2.02%+0.1%-2.12%
1 Year-12.75%-5.02%-7.74%
2 Year-36.64%+35.37%-72.01%
3 Year-33.22%+130.26%-163.49%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score10 / 100Riskier than 25% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in balance sheet stress. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Balance Sheet Stress
+7.9 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+2.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk10 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 10 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Deterioration Drivers
ESCLow Interest Coverage
+1 pts
RESOLVEDOperating Leverage Stress
-12 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Interest coverage ratio

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
HIGHPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Operating Leverage Stress (Q4-FY26)✓ Short-Term Liquidity Stress (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest CoverageHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Increased debt levels and leverage are putting pressure on solvency margins. Interest coverage metrics should be closely monitored for serviceability capacity.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (3)Free Preview (2 of 3)

CriticalHigh
[F4]Low Interest Coverage
Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CoverageCritical Tier
-0.35xEBIT -₹2.7 Cr
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineSolvency Floor: 2.50x
Empirical Trigger

SHEMAROO: Low Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.35x in FY2027 Q1 (Threshold: 2.5x).

Forensic Implication

Interest coverage is dangerously low. Even a minor fall in profit could trigger a default.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+42.3%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: -13.8%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 3 Forensic Signals (1 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 3 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Shemaroo Entertainment Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Shemaroo Entertainment Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Communication Services (n=0 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Communication Services
Position: 25th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
10/100
LATEST
15➔10/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by Operating Leverage Stress (-12.0 pts), partially offset by Low Interest Coverage (+1.0 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base15Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+11 flag
➔
- Resolved-121 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (+4 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+2 pts).
+6Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal10-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
Escalated Stress (1 Flag)
+1 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·Escalated Risk
• Trigger:Finance costs elevated relative to operating profit, narrowing interest coverage headroom.
Interest Coverage:-11.2x → -0.2x
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-12 pts
Growth Sustainability·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Revenue growth improved while operating-cost growth moderated, reducing operating leverage pressure.
Revenue YoY:-5.6%Op. Expenses YoY:-31.5%Operating Margin:-62.5% → -1.4%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+0.7 pts
Q4 FY26: 7.2→Q1 FY27: 7.9
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability-10 pts
Q4 FY26: 10→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(4.7)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░47th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (40).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Shemaroo Entertainment Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
-44.4%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
201 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
1.12x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹583 Cr
Weakening↓
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue583685707557381+2%
growth % YoY−14.9%−3.1%+26.9%+46.2%——
EBITDA(259)(71)55138n/m
margin %-44.4%-10.4%0.7%9.2%10.0%—
Net Profit(218)(84)(40)105n/m
margin %-37.4%-12.3%-5.7%1.8%1.3%—
CFO24.073.026.0(17.0)44.0n/m
CFO / Net Profit-0.11x-0.87x-0.65x-1.70x8.80x—
Debt302304340321254-2%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Stretched Working Capital Cycle: CCC at 201 days
Cash Conversion Cycle
201 days-125d YoY
Receivables:-15d
Inventory:-91d
Payables:+19d
Net Working Capital
₹322 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 508 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-242 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-477 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -31.19% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
711101511296055105159141191
Inventories(₹ Cr)
339568682735715730714603530500
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
886810794492549301819
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
322610726770726760770732653672
Working Capital / Sales(%)
55.2%89.1%102.7%138.2%190.6%244.4%150.1%128.9%133.5%157.7%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
201d326d375d505d695d893d548d470d488d576d
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
44d59d78d85d57d65d75d102d105d164d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
212d303d352d482d685d857d508d387d396d428d
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
55d36d55d62d47d29d35d19d13d16d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-20.6%-24.0%-9.9%+68.8%-13.4%-8.2%-24.3%-3.4%-41.0%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-25.4%-13.6%-34.1%-43.4%-24.6%+41.6%+28.1%-2.4%-8.8%—
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-5.9%-12.2%-28.5%-29.4%-21.1%+36.6%+18.4%-2.6%-21.1%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-242-157-6627-39-323850-62117
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-31.2%-16.6%-6.4%2.8%-4.4%-3.6%4.4%6.4%-8.2%15.0%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
——520.0%-36.2%118.9%76.9%-10.4%20.3%93.7%-45.3%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
0.0%0.0%0.0%2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 67.24% (+1.36 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII 0 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic 0 pp
FII+DII Net: 0 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (67.24%)
FII (0.00%)
DII (0.00%)
Public (32.76%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — FII / FPI 0.00% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in balance sheet stress remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹98, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 24.1% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 24.1%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth24.1%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery-11.9%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+36.1%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk57/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-14%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (26%)
Historical (-11.9%)
Market (24.1%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing SHEMAROO for 24.1% long-term growth versus -11.9% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide limited support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-11.9% CAGR
✗ Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
-19.0% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
0.0% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
50/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak historical delivery
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support7.46% (Strong)
Sector PremiumN/A
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)24.1%-11.9%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)-36.7%-19.0%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion19.4%0.0%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration and stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
42%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowNeutral
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Institutional participation remains neutral, while trend quality stays weakening and momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
○Institutional flow remains neutral
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
42%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions6 Sessions
Transition Probability25% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.5426σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualitySoftening
150 DMA Slope+0.7625%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹0.1 Cr94.11% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 62.5% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0.2 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.3827σ
Universe Rank
#1725 of 2259Bottom 23.64% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.13σ
7D Flow TrendNeutral
SHEMAROO
STAGE 3 • TOPPING
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on SHEMAROO & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →