Yes Bank Limited
YESBANKStructural risk assessment following Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 earnings.
Q3-FY26 | 31 Dec 25
23
Risk Score
Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26
18
Risk Score
đĸRisk decreased by â5 points
Flagium detected:
- âStabilization in key metrics
âšī¸ Executive Summary
Yes Bank Limited posted steady top-line growth and bottom-line stability, demonstrating resilient execution in its core markets. While the underlying business remains fundamentally sound, the presence of 0 active risk warnings highlights minor operational or working capital inefficiencies to keep on the watch list.
đĄī¸ Sentinel Insight
"Yes Bank Limited currently sits within Flagium's Stable category. However, recent periods have remained stable with minor operational friction. Steady top-line performance and clean accounting records help keep structural risk contained. Current deterioration appears cyclical rather than existential."
The Quarter at a Glance
| Metric | Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 | Q4-FY25 | 31 Mar 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | âš9,478.1 Cr | âš9,437.9 Cr | +0.4% |
| EBIT Margin | 0.00% | 0.00% | +0 bps |
| Net Profit (PAT) | âš1,082.2 Cr | âš744.5 Cr | +45.4% |
| Interest Expense | âš5,029.7 Cr | âš5,351.9 Cr | -6.0% |
â scroll to see all â
What Changed Beneath the Headlines?
Revenue Growth
Quarterly revenue changed by +0.4% YoY, reflecting demand and volume updates.
Net Profit Expansion
Profit after tax changed by +45.4% YoY, settling at âš1,082.2 Cr.
Capital Allocation & Cash Flow
Cash flow generation and liquidity indicators remained stable in line with core target ranges.
Flagium Risk Signals
Financial reports demonstrate robust disclosure levels with no forensic or accrual warnings.
Leadership team stability remains intact with no auditor qualifications or key departures.
What the financials are implicitly signaling
Flagium's structural analysis indicates:
- âĸCapacity utilization calibration is being monitored to align with slow volume intake.
- âĸWorking capital conversion cycles require active support to sustain cash conversions.
Signals to Monitor Next Quarter
Raw material price movement and its impact on operating margins.
Working capital efficiency and cash flow conversions.
Domestic demand recovery and segment-wise volume growth.
Historical Quality Trend
Last 6 Quarters| Quarter | Risk Score | Trend | Current Risk Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 FY26 | 18 | â | đĸ Stable |
| Q3 FY26 | 23 | â | đ Watch |
| Q2 FY26 | 28 | â | đ Watch |
| Q1 FY26 | 8 | â | đĸ Stable |
| Q4 FY25 | 13 | â | đĸ Stable |
| Q3 FY25 | 18 | â | đĸ Stable |
â scroll to see all â
What to do next
Explore YESBANK's full structural risk profile â 12Q score trajectory, pillar breakdown, flag history, and peer benchmarking.
View YESBANK profile âSee how Financial Services peers and the broader market are positioned. Identify sector-wide stress or rotation signals.
Open market monitor âCheck how this Q4-FY26 | 31 Mar 26 result affects your portfolio's overall risk exposure and concentration.
Review your portfolio âDisclaimer
Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics platform. Analysis reports are compiled programmatically from public regulatory XBRL submissions (NSE/BSE). This evaluation does not constitute investment advice, financial planning, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment advisor before acting on any data presented.