AARTIDRUGS
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap
Aarti Drugs Limited
Healthcare›Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology›Pharmaceuticals
Current Price₹447.9(+11.35%)
Market Cap₹4,088 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
14/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)52nd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuations○ Balanced
Expectation Gap-78.0%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure✓ Strong
Stage 22 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟢ConfirmingMarket structure and positive capital flows confirm stable underlying fundamentals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Aarti Drugs Limited (AARTIDRUGS)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, Aarti Drugs Limited is maintaining a stable earnings trajectory, with 16.0% YoY growth in reported PAT to ₹194.9 Cr and a CFO/PAT ratio of 1.3, indicating cash-backed profitability. Historical monitoring signals around industrial margin stress and capex efficiency are currently easing as operating costs stabilize and revenue growth improves. Balance sheet integrity is strong, with D/E at 0.37 and operating cash flows of ₹253.5 Cr providing financial resilience despite 6.1% YoY debt growth. Temporary operational friction—reflected in a 50.0 bps decline in EBITDA margins and a 17.1% capex-to-revenue ratio—remains contained, keeping Aarti Drugs Limited within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✓Relative Growth Weakness resolved this quarter (10.6 pts)
  • ✗New risk trigger: Operating Leverage Stress (+4.5 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is strong
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (13.94σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +3.9% this quarter (from ₹430.9 on 30 Sept to ₹447.9)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Industrial Margin Stress and balance sheet impact
  • 🟢Relative Growth Weakness resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 4.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH86/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)46/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION100/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹447.9(+11.35%)
1M Divergence+10.94%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+15.26%-1.46%+16.72%
1 Month+4.25%-6.69%+10.94%
6 Months+19.03%+6.82%+12.2%
1 Year-6.4%+8.93%-15.33%
2 Year-6.7%+47.64%-54.35%
3 Year-3.99%+125.5%-129.49%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score14 / 100Riskier than 52% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in growth sustainability. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+4.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk14 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 4 → 14 over 14 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWOperating Leverage Stress
+4.5 pts
ESCIndustrial Margin Stress
+4.4 pts
RESOLVEDRelative Growth Weakness
-10.6 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Trend Deterioration
■Industrial Margin Stress
HIGHPersistent
Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage Stress
MEDIUMAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2024)✓ Relative Growth Weakness (Q4-FY26)✓ Revenue-Debt Divergence (FY2025)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Trend Deterioration
■Industrial Margin StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Industrial Margin Stress is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (6)Free Preview (2 of 6)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Trend DeteriorationQuarterlyActive for 5 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
12.8%↑ 50 bps
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 8.8%
Empirical Trigger

AARTIDRUGS: Raw material costs consumed an additional 7.5% of revenue YoY.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+4.4%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 8.8%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 6 Forensic Signals (4 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 6 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Aarti Drugs Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Aarti Drugs Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Healthcare (n=166 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Healthcare(n=166 peers)
Median Risk: 15/100Position: 52th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
5/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
19/100
14/100
LATEST
19➔14/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by Relative Growth Weakness (-10.6 pts), partially offset by new Operating Leverage Stress (+4.5 pts) and Industrial Margin Stress (+4.4 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base19Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+8.92 flags
➔
- Resolved-10.61 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-7.3 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+4 pts).
-3.3Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal14-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter3 Active Catalysts
New Stress (1 Flag)
+4.5 pts
Growth Sustainability·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Operating expense growth outpaced revenue growth, breaching operating leverage stress threshold.
Revenue YoY:+19.1%Op. Expenses YoY:+17.1%Operating Margin:9.8% → 10.1%
Escalated Stress (1 Flag)
+4.4 pts
Growth Sustainability·MEDIUM → HIGH
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:9.8% → 10.1%Revenue YoY:+19.1%
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-10.6 pts
Competitive Position·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Underlying risk metrics normalized below Flagium's systematic alert threshold.
Revenue YoY:+19.1%PAT YoY:-7.1%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position-10.6 pts
Q4 FY26: 10.6→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+1.2 pts
Q4 FY26: 8.8→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (15).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Aarti Drugs Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
12.1%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
120 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.37x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹2,568 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––
Revenue2,5682,4032,5332,7182,500-2%
growth % YoY+6.8%−5.1%−6.8%+8.7%——
EBITDA312303321308341+0%
margin %12.1%12.6%12.7%11.3%13.6%—
Net Profit195168172166205+5%
margin %7.6%7.0%6.8%6.1%8.2%—
CFO25424535913470+24%
CFO / Net Profit1.30x1.45x2.09x0.81x0.34x—
Debt575612562607—-2%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2024 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
120 days-3d YoY
Receivables:+4d
Inventory:-2d
Payables:+5d
Net Working Capital
₹843 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 119 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-59 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-155 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -2.17% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
830751705865——————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
491473486516——————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
478416425480——————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
843808765901——————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
32.8%33.6%30.2%33.1%——————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
120d123d111d121d——————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
118d114d102d116d——————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
70d72d70d69d——————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
68d63d61d64d——————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+3.6%+11.7%-11.7%———————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-3.1%+2.4%+0.9%———————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+2.5%+11.0%+7.3%—————+12.5%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-59-76-18732135———12-93
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-2.2%-3.0%-7.7%1.3%————0.9%-7.8%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
120.2%115.5%152.4%59.9%25.8%———34.7%92.1%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
——————————

Industry Intelligence

Pharmaceutical Sector KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current33.3%
QoQ Change-750 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-620 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median64.0%

Understanding Pharmaceutical KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Promoter holding down 3.40 pp across 12 quarters — requires monitoring
Promoter holding 54.07% (−3.40 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 12.50%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.74 ppDII -0.05 ppPromoters -0.36 ppPublic -0.32 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.69 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (54.07%)
FII (2.26%)
DII (10.24%)
Public (33.43%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹448, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 31.1% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 31.1%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth31.1%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery4.2%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+26.9%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk55/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (33%)
Historical (4.2%)
Market (31.1%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing AARTIDRUGS for 31.1% long-term growth versus 4.2% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
4.2% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
8.8% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
42.1% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
55/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support1.96% (Moderate)
Sector Premium-39% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)31.1%4.2%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)8.6%8.8%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion34.7%42.1%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
STRONG UPTRENDBREAKOUT & MOMENTUM
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
86%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the constructive trend as momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟢Confirming

Market structure and positive capital flows confirm stable underlying fundamentals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
86%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions2 Sessions
Transition Probability96% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.1153σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+1.8040%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹40 Cr7.72% Delivery (Day-Trading Heavy)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +53.1% (21D vs 200D Avg)Expanding Accumulation Trend
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹6.4 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.4983σ
Universe Rank
#312 of 2259Top 13.81% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+13.94σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
AARTIDRUGS
STAGE 2 • UPTREND
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on AARTIDRUGS & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →