AARTIPHARM
Aarti Pharmalabs Limited
Healthcareโ€บPharmaceuticals & Biotechnologyโ€บPharmaceuticals
Current Priceโ‚น881.95(-0.45%)
Market Capโ‚น7,996 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
27/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean โ€ข 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)56th Percentile ยท Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business๐ŸŸก Watch
Primary DriverIndustrial Margin Stress
Valuationsโ—‹ Balanced
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structureโœ“ Strong
Stage 29 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment๐Ÿ”ดDivergingPrice structure remains strong despite building fundamental risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Aarti Pharmalabs Limited (AARTIPHARM)โ€ขUpdated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

๐Ÿšจ Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Aarti Pharmalabs Limited is experiencing severe earnings quality deterioration, marked by a 35.9% YoY decline in reported net profit to โ‚น174.7 Cr from โ‚น272.4 Cr, compounded by a 7.5% YoY compression in EBIT margins to 12.9%. This is accompanied by a 21.0% YoY contraction in operating cash flow to โ‚น261.9 Cr, reflecting intensifying operational friction. This structural strain is driven by persistent margin compression, elevated capex of 51.7% of revenue, and a 73.0% YoY expansion in total debt to โ‚น685.6 Cr, pushing debt-to-equity to 0.32. Concurrently, receivable days surged to 87.9, and inventory-revenue divergence widened to 1.56x, indicating liquidity pressure and working capital strain.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • โœ“Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • โœ—Profitability margins remain stressed
  • โœ—New risk trigger: Universal Inventory Divergence (+9.6 pts)
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ“Market structure is strong
  • โœ“Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.46ฯƒ)
  • โœ—Share price is down -7.5% this quarter (from โ‚น953.75 on 30 Sept to โ‚น881.95)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • ๐Ÿ”ดInvestigate Industrial Margin Stress and balance sheet impact
  • ๐ŸŸ Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • ๐ŸŸขMaintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 9.9 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 9.5 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 7.6 ptsGovernance
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH73/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)44/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION61/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
๐ŸŸก
Profile: STRONG ร— BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น881.95(-0.45%)
1M Divergence+3.18%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+4.59%-1.46%+6.05%
1 Month-3.51%-6.69%+3.18%
6 Months+19.14%+6.82%+12.32%
1 Year+4.84%+8.93%-4.08%
2 Year+40.62%+47.64%-7.02%
3 Year+122.39%+125.5%-3.11%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score27 / 100Riskier than 56% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend-5 QoQ ยท ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in growth sustainability. This suggests the risk profile is currently stabilizing. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Growth Sustainability
+9.9 pts
Balance Sheet Stress
+9.5 pts
Governance
+7.6 pts
Final Composite Risk27 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 6 โ†’ 27 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWUniversal Inventory Divergence
+9.6 pts
NEWPromoter Stake Dilution
+7.7 pts
PERSISTENTIndustrial Margin Stress
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins
  • Inventory turnover

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Trend Deterioration
โ– Industrial Margin Stress
HIGHPersistent
Governance Signals
โ– Promoter Stake Dilution
HIGHAccelerating
Earning Quality
โ– Universal Inventory Divergence
MODERATEAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
โœ“ Margin Compression (Q4-FY26)โœ“ Relative Growth Weakness (Q4-FY26)โœ“ Capex Efficiency Stress (Q2-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Universal Inventory DivergenceMODERATE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (10)Free Preview (2 of 10)

CriticalHigh
[F15]Universal Inventory Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Inv DivergenceHigh Tier
+20.6 ppDSI +19.9%
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

AARTIPHARM: Inventory growth outpaced Revenue growth by +20.6 pp (Inventory holding ratio increased +19.9%).

Forensic Implication

Slight build-up in inventory detected. Monitor for slowing sales momentum.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Trend DeteriorationQuarterlyActive for 6 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
19.8%โ†‘ 443 bps
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 16.0%
Empirical Trigger

AARTIPHARM: Raw material costs consumed an additional 6.2% of revenue YoY.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
๐Ÿ”’
โญ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 10 Forensic Signals (8 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 10 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Aarti Pharmalabs Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free โ†’๐ŸŽ 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Aarti Pharmalabs Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Healthcare (n=166 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Healthcare(n=166 peers)
Median Risk: 15/100Position: 56th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

โ† Swipe older12Q window
11/100
Base
6/100
1/100
6/100
1/100
0/100
5/100
35/100
BREAK
37/100
40/100
32/100
27/100
LATEST
32โž”27/100
โ–ผ5-point improvement(Q1 FY27 โž” Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by overall risk reduction across core indicators, partially offset by new Universal Inventory Divergence (+9.6 pts) and new Promoter Stake Dilution (+7.7 pts).

Reconciliation Bridgeยท Swipe โž”
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base32Q1 FY27
โž”
+ New Stress+17.32 flags
โž”
- Resolved00 flags cleared
โž”
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-22.3 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
-22.3Pillar Cap & Drift
โž”
Terminal27-5 net ยท Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+9.6 pts
Balance Sheet StressยทMODERATE Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Inventory accumulated faster than sales throughput, signalling working capital lockup.
Inventory YoY:+28.0%Revenue YoY:+46.0%
+7.7 pts
GovernanceยทHIGH Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Significant promoter stake reduction outside statutory SEBI Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) compliance.
Revenue YoY:+46.0%PAT YoY:+156.0%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+9.6 pts
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 9.6
Competitive Positionโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Qualityโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Governance+7.7 pts
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 7.7
Growth Sustainabilityโ€”
Q1 FY27: 10โ†’Q2 FY27: 10
Solvencyโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK โ€” Q2 FY265 โ†’ 35 | +30 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+30.0 pts), driven by new Relative Growth Weakness (+13.0 pts) and new Capex Efficiency Stress (+10.8 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
โ€ขNew Forensic Triggers: 2 new risk signals emerged: Relative Growth Weakness, Capex Efficiency Stress
โ€ขIndustrial Margin Stress Escalation: Severity escalated from HIGH to SEVERE
โ€ขFinding: Revenue growth consistently lags behind secto...
โ€ขRevenue YoY: -9.5%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(6.2)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘62th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(5.2)Fairโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘53th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0.1)Weakโ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘1th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (15).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Aarti Pharmalabs Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited ยท Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
20.6%
Weakeningโ†“
Cash Conversion (CCC)
177 Days
Weakeningโ†“
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.32x
Deterioratingโ†‘
Revenue Trend
โ‚น1,829 Cr
Weakeningโ†“
Swipe for all periods โ‡†
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggersโ€“โ€“
Revenue1,8292,1251,8581,9481,200-2%
growth % YoYโˆ’13.9%+14.4%โˆ’4.6%+62.3%โ€”โ€”
EBITDA376474391344209+3%
margin %20.6%22.3%21.0%17.7%17.4%โ€”
Net Profit175272217193122-3%
margin %9.6%12.8%11.7%9.9%10.2%โ€”
CFO262332216263(44)-0%
CFO / Net Profit1.50x1.22x1.00x1.36x-0.36xโ€”
Debt686396264214338+47%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2024 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosuresยท6 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivableโ€“Revenue Divergence: +15.3 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)Inventoryโ€“Revenue Divergence: +22.9 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)Operating Cycle Elongation: CCC widened by +25 days YoY
Cash Conversion Cycle
177 days+25d YoY
Receivables:+17d
Inventory:+27d
Payables:+19d
Net Working Capital
โ‚น889 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 153 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
โ‚น-87 Cr
PAT โˆ’ CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: โ‚น-49 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -2.73% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Trade Receivables(โ‚น Cr)
583575519440โ€”โ€”
Inventories(โ‚น Cr)
640588643602โ€”โ€”
Trade Payables(โ‚น Cr)
335278378347โ€”โ€”
Net Working Capital(โ‚น Cr)
889885784695โ€”โ€”
Working Capital / Sales(%)
48.6%41.7%42.2%35.7%โ€”โ€”

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
177d152d154d130dโ€”โ€”
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
116d99d102d82dโ€”โ€”
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
128d101d126d113dโ€”โ€”
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
67d48d74d65dโ€”โ€”

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Receivable Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+15.3%-3.6%+22.6%โ€”โ€”โ€”
Inventory Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+22.9%-23.0%+11.4%โ€”โ€”โ€”
Asset Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+33.7%-1.9%+20.4%-52.9%โ€”โ€”
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(โ‚น Cr)
-87-591-701660
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-2.7%-2.2%0.0%-3.3%8.1%โ€”
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
115.0%91.9%72.0%100.9%-21.3%โ€”
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
18.6%21.7%7.2%6.3%โ€”โ€”

Industry Intelligence

Pharmaceutical Sector KPIs
Gross Margin
โ“˜
Q2 FY2027
Current45.2%
QoQ Change-780 bpsโ†“ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-620 bpsโ†“ Profitability contraction
Industry Median64.0%

Understanding Pharmaceutical KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More โ†’
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Institutional & Governance Signals
Promoter Trimming: Promoter holding dropped by 3.20 pp QoQ.
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.02 ppDII +1.18 ppPromoters -3.2 ppPublic +2.04 pp
FII+DII Net: +1.16 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (39.66%)
FII (8.15%)
DII (8.40%)
Govt (0.01%)
Public (43.78%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged โ€” Government 0.01% ยท Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% ยท Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently improving. Recent structural triggers in growth sustainability suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in core structural metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation โ€ข What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of โ‚น882, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 34.9% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 34.9%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR34.9%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR-2.1%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+37.0%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk65/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (37%)
Historical (-2.1%)
Market (34.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing AARTIPHARM for 34.9% implied revenue growth versus -2.1% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-2.1% CAGR
โœ— Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
15.2% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-21.4% Conv
โœ— Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
20/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“High implied growth
โœ“Weak historical delivery
โœ“Expensive valuation regime
โœ“Weak profitability support
โœ“Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-1.84% (Weak)
Sector Premium-21% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)34.9%-2.1%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)14.8%15.2%Achievable
Free Cash Flow Conversion-46.0%-21.4%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration, stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
STRONG UPTRENDBREAKOUT & MOMENTUM
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
91%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Institutional participation has also improved, reinforcing the constructive trend as momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
โœ“Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
โœ“RS continues to lead the market
โœ“Institutional flow has improved
โœ“Momentum remains positive
Summary
๐Ÿ”ดDiverging

Price structure remains strong despite building fundamental risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
91%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions9 Sessions
Transition Probability98% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.9474ฯƒ Healthy
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+3.8460%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
โ‚น14 Cr34.09% Delivery (Moderate Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
โ–ฒ +83.5% (21D vs 200D Avg)Expanding Accumulation Trend
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in โ‚น Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
โ‚น34.7 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (โ‰ฅโ‚น100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (โ‚น50โ€“โ‚น100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<โ‚น50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (โ‰ฅ1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Healthy

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.5869ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#271 of 2259Top 12.00% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
+0.46ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
AARTIPHARM
STAGE 2 โ€ข UPTREND
โ€”
C:โ€”
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

๐Ÿ“ฌ Flagium Risk Brief โ€” Track forensic risks on AARTIPHARM & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue โ†’