ALPHALOGIC
BSEโ†—Micro Cap๐Ÿ”ตFounder / Family
Alphalogic Techsys Limited
Information Technologyโ€บComputers - Software & Consulting
Current Priceโ‚น37.28(+3.18%)
Market Capโ‚น233 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated5 Nov 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
35/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean โ€ข 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)83rd Percentile ยท Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
DeterioratingQoQ Delta +16 pts
Business๐ŸŸก Watch
Primary DriverUniversal Inventory Divergence
Valuationsโœ— Demanding
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structureโ—‹ Topping
Stage 37 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment๐ŸŸกPartial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Alphalogic Techsys Limited (ALPHALOGIC)โ€ขUpdated today

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • โœ—Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +16 pts)
  • โœ“Profitability margins pressure eased
  • โœ“Universal Inventory Divergence resolved this quarter (9.2 pts)
  • โœ—New risk trigger: Relative Growth Weakness (+13 pts)
  • โœ—Growth expectations are demanding
  • โœ“Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • โœ“A/D flow regime is Accumulation (0.31ฯƒ)
  • โœ—Share price is down -6.7% this quarter (from โ‚น39.97 on 30 Sept to โ‚น37.28)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • ๐Ÿ”ดReview 1 active forensic warning flag for structural stress
  • ๐ŸŸขUniversal Inventory Divergence resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • ๐ŸŸขMaintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 20.7 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 14.3 ptsCompetitive Position
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH65/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)46/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
A/D FLOW ACCUMULATION58/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
๐Ÿ”ด
Profile: MODERATE ร— DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
โ‚น37.28(+3.18%)
1M Divergence-8.98%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+2.42%+2.1%+0.32%
1 Month-5.36%+3.62%-8.98%
6 Months-33.9%+7.87%-41.77%
1 Year-51.22%-6.15%-45.08%
2 Year-73.49%+4.12%-77.62%
3 Year-0.21%+79.88%-80.09%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score35 / 100Riskier than 83% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend+16 QoQ ยท DeterioratingRisk score deteriorated (+16 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (5 Qtrs)Deteriorating for 5 qtrs
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in profitability and earnings quality. This suggests a building risk profile. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+20.7 pts
Competitive Position
+14.3 pts
Final Composite Risk35 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 โ†’ 35 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
ESCALATING RISK
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWRelative Growth Weakness
+13 pts
NEWProfit Collapse
+7.7 pts
RESOLVEDUniversal Inventory Divergence
-9.2 pts
PERSISTENTReceivables-Revenue Divergence
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Inventory turnover

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
โ– Universal Inventory Divergence
MODERATEPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
โœ“ Relative Growth Weakness (Q2-FY27)โœ“ Short-Term Liquidity Stress (FY2026)โœ“ CFO-EBITDA Divergence (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
โ– Universal Inventory DivergenceMODERATE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (10)Free Preview (2 of 10)

CriticalHigh
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
-91.3%Sec 16.8%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineSec Median: 16.8%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (16.8%).

Forensic Implication

Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[F11]Receivables-Revenue Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 5 Qtrs
Rec DivergenceHigh Tier
+34.4 ppDSRI 1.53x
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineYoY Prior: -55.3 pp
Empirical Trigger

ALPHALOGIC: Trade Receivables growth outpaced Revenue by +34.4 pp (DSRI: 1.53x).

Forensic Implication

Collection efficiency is improving. Debtor days are trending back toward normal levels.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
๐Ÿ”’
โญ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 10 Forensic Signals (8 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 10 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Alphalogic Techsys Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free โ†’๐ŸŽ 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Alphalogic Techsys Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Information Technology (n=109 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Information Technology(n=109 peers)
Median Risk: 15/100Position: 83th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

โ† Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
15/100
19/100
35/100
BREAKLATEST
19โž”35/100
โ–ฒ16-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 โž” Q2 FY27)
Structural Break Quarter
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated materially (+16.0 pts), driven by new Relative Growth Weakness (+13.0 pts) and new Profit Collapse (+7.7 pts), partially offset by Universal Inventory Divergence relief (-9.2 pts).

Reconciliation Bridgeยท Swipe โž”
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base19Q1 FY27
โž”
+ New Stress+20.72 flags
โž”
- Resolved-9.21 flag cleared
โž”
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (+11.5 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-7 pts).
+4.5Pillar Cap & Drift
โž”
Terminal35+16 net ยท Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter3 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+13 pts
Competitive PositionยทSEVERE Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector medians.
Revenue YoY:-91.3%PAT YoY:-74.2%
+7.7 pts
Earnings QualityยทHIGH Risk
โ€ข Trigger:Net profit experienced severe contraction, triggering earnings distress alert.
PAT YoY:-74.2%PAT QoQ:-65.9%
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-9.2 pts
Balance Sheet StressยทBelow Risk Threshold
โ€ข Cause:Inventory turnover normalized with stock levels realigning to sales velocity.
Revenue YoY:-91.3%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress-6.9 pts
Q1 FY27: 6.9โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Competitive Position+17.3 pts
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 17.3
Earnings Quality+13.1 pts
Q1 FY27: 11.9โ†’Q2 FY27: 25
Governanceโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainabilityโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Solvencyโ€”
Q1 FY27: 0โ†’Q2 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK โ€” Q2 FY2719 โ†’ 35 | +16 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+16.0 pts), driven by new Relative Growth Weakness (+13.0 pts) and new Profit Collapse (+7.7 pts), partially offset by Universal Inventory Divergence relief (-9.2 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
โ€ขNew Forensic Triggers: 2 new risk signals emerged: Relative Growth Weakness, Profit Collapse
โ€ขFinding: Revenue growth consistently lags behind secto...
โ€ขRevenue YoY: -91.3%
โ€ขPAT YoY: -74.2%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: HEALTHY
Solvency(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Earnings Quality(1.7)Weakโ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘17th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile
Competitive Position(2.8)Weakโ˜…โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†โ˜†
โ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘29th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellentโ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (15).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Alphalogic Techsys Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited ยท Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
22.0%
Growingโ†‘
Cash Conversion (CCC)
73 Days
Weakeningโ†“
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.88x
Deterioratingโ†‘
Revenue Trend
โ‚น51 Cr
Weakeningโ†“
Swipe for all periods โ‡†
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggersโ€“โ€“โ€“โ€“
Revenue50.678.053.922.212.0+32%
growth % YoYโˆ’35.2%+44.6%+142.7%+84.9%โ€”โ€”
EBITDA11.19.17.86.13.6+22%
margin %22.0%11.6%14.5%27.5%30.2%โ€”
Net Profit7.596.295.294.082.07+23%
margin %15.0%8.1%9.8%18.4%17.2%โ€”
CFO(31.2)2.50.5(7.5)(5.5)n/m
CFO / Net Profit-4.11x0.39x0.09x-1.83x-2.66xโ€”
Debt45.70.84.97.14.3+86%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosuresยท7 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Receivableโ€“Revenue Divergence: +34.4 pp (Investigate credit elongation and revenue recognition)Inventoryโ€“Revenue Divergence: +60.2 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)Elevated Accrual Pressure: Accrual Ratio at 42.65% of average assetsOperating Cycle Elongation: CCC widened by +40 days YoYOperating Cash Realisation Lag: CFO covers only -338.7% of reported EBITDACapitalisation Intensity Spike: CWIP at 91.1% of fixed assets (Elevated vs historical 70%)
Cash Conversion Cycle
73 days+40d YoY
Receivables:+20d
Inventory:+17d
Payables:-3d
Net Working Capital
โ‚น10 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 53 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
โ‚น39 Cr
PAT โˆ’ CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: โ‚น68 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Elevated Accrual Pressure
Accruals: 42.65% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Trade Receivables(โ‚น Cr)
889320โ€”
Inventories(โ‚น Cr)
545210โ€”
Trade Payables(โ‚น Cr)
354110โ€”
Net Working Capital(โ‚น Cr)
10710520โ€”
Working Capital / Sales(%)
20.3%9.0%18.6%20.5%14.6%5.1%โ€”

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
73d33d68d75d53d18dโ€”
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
58d38d62d51d56d21dโ€”
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
36d19d34d33d30d0dโ€”
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
21d24d28d9d33d3dโ€”

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Receivable Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+34.4%-55.3%+50.9%-16.8%+358.8%โ€”โ€”
Inventory Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+60.2%-64.6%+7.3%+15.1%โ€”โ€”โ€”
Asset Growth vs Sales (ฮ”)(%)
+117.4%-36.0%-83.5%-33.3%-33.6%โ€”โ€”
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(โ‚น Cr)
39451280โ€”
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
42.6%6.2%9.9%37.3%40.0%0.2%โ€”
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
-338.7%35.0%8.1%-139.6%-364.9%366.7%โ€”
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
91.1%92.3%85.0%84.8%89.2%0.0%โ€”
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge๐Ÿ”ตFounder / Family
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 73.78% (+0.78 pp across 12 quarters) ยท zero pledge or encumbrance ยท institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q1 FY2027 ยท latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q1 FY2027):FII 0 ppDII 0 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic 0 pp
FII+DII Net: 0 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q1 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (73.78%)
FII (0.00%)
DII (0.00%)
Public (26.22%)
Quarterly Progression
5 unchanged โ€” FII / FPI 0.00% ยท DII (MFs/Ins) 0.00% ยท Government 0.00% ยท Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% ยท Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE โ€ข NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains stable.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently deteriorating. Recent structural triggers in earnings quality suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in operational margins and profitability metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation โ€ข What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of โ‚น37, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 45.2% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 45.2%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR45.2%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR20.0%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+25.2%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk79/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (47%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (45.2%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing ALPHALOGIC for 45.2% implied revenue growth versus 20.0% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear demanding, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
โœ“ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
12.9% Margin
โœ— Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-186.0% Conv
โœ— Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
โœ“ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
โœ“High implied growth
โœ“Expensive valuation regime
โœ“Weak profitability support
โœ“Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-18.20% (Weak)
Sector Premium+112% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)45.2%20.0%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)27.2%12.9%Aggressive
Free Cash Flow Conversion-460.9%-186.0%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weakening and momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
โœ—Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
โœ—RS continues to lag the market
โœ“A/D flow has improved
โœ—Momentum remains negative
Summary
๐ŸŸกPartial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Institutional mark-up & trend continuation)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions7 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.4296ฯƒ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualitySoftening
150 DMA Slope-0.4912%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
N/A
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
N/ASteady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in โ‚น Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
โ‚น0 Cr
Liquidity Tier
Categorizes trading liquidity depth based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (โ‰ฅโ‚น100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (โ‚น50โ€“โ‚น100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<โ‚น50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (โ‰ฅ1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & A/D Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (ฯƒ). Readings beyond ยฑ2.0ฯƒ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.2969ฯƒ
Universe Rank
#1614 of 2265Bottom 28.74% in momentum strength
A/D Flow Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative volume-weighted A/D flow score in standard deviations (ฯƒ).
+0.31ฯƒ
7D Flow TrendImproving
ALPHALOGIC
STAGE 3 โ€ข TOPPING
โ€”
C:โ€”
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

๐Ÿ“ฌ Flagium Risk Brief โ€” Track forensic risks on ALPHALOGIC & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue โ†’