CARRARO
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap
Carraro India Limited
Automobile and Auto Components›Auto Components›Auto Components & Equipments
Current Price₹500.05(-0.43%)
Market Cap₹2,843 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
3/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)11th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
No Active Flags
Valuations○ Balanced
Expectation Gap-29.1%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Topping
Stage 36 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Carraro India Limited (CARRARO)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, Carraro India Limited demonstrates a resilient earnings trajectory, with 25.3% revenue growth and a 48.2% YoY expansion in reported net profit to ₹130.6 Cr. Strong operating cash flows of ₹134.6 Cr, supported by a CFO/PAT ratio of 1.03, underscore cash-backed profitability despite a temporary working capital expansion. Balance sheet integrity remains stable, with total debt of ₹141.5 Cr (D/E: 0.25) and a contained operating leverage gap. The medium-severity working capital expansion, characterized by receivable days rising to 55.7, is easing after three quarters of pressure. Carraro India Limited operates within Flagium’s stable surveillance range, with no heightened risk signals currently active.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✓Working Capital Expansion resolved this quarter (8 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.34σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -5.2% this quarter (from ₹527.5 on 30 Sept to ₹500.05)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for CARRARO
  • 🟢Working Capital Expansion resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 3.0 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH97/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION58/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹500.05(-0.43%)
1M Divergence+2.17%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+4.46%-1.46%+5.92%
1 Month-4.52%-6.69%+2.17%
6 Months-10.71%+6.82%-17.54%
1 Year+3.59%+8.93%-5.33%
2 Year-20.75%+47.64%-68.39%
3 Year-20.75%+125.5%-146.24%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score3 / 100Riskier than 11% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in balance sheet stress. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Balance Sheet Stress
+3.0 pts
Final Composite Risk3 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 3 over 13 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Risk Relief & Attribution Drivers
RESOLVEDWorking Capital Expansion
-8 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Sustainability of earnings recovery
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Working Capital Expansion (Q4-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (1)

CriticalHigh
[M2]Working Capital Expansion
Liquidity & CoverageQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
ReceivablesHigh Tier
55.7d
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselinePrior Year: 59.3d
Empirical Trigger

Working capital expansion detected: Receivable days increased by -6.1%.

Forensic Implication

Working capital pressure is receding. Cash previously locked in operations is being released.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Carraro India Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Automobile and Auto Components (n=94 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Automobile and Auto Components(n=94 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 11th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
11/100
6/100
14/100
9/100
8/100
3/100
LATEST
8➔3/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by Working Capital Expansion (-8.0 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base8Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved-81 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (0 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+3 pts).
+3Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal3-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-8 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Trade debtor collections accelerated, reducing receivables-to-revenue divergence.
Revenue YoY:+11.7%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress-8 pts
Q4 FY26: 8→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(8.5)Good★★★★☆
████░85th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Carraro India Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
10.4%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
44 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.25x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹2,284 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue2,2841,8231,7891,7131,498+10%
growth % YoY+25.3%+1.9%+4.4%+14.4%——
EBITDA23818614912583+24%
margin %10.4%10.2%8.3%7.3%5.5%—
Net Profit13188634822+40%
margin %5.7%4.8%3.5%2.8%1.5%—
CFO135761128096+19%
CFO / Net Profit1.03x0.87x1.78x1.67x4.36x—
Debt141175216192182-10%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·5 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
44 days-4d YoY
Receivables:+2d
Inventory:-9d
Payables:-3d
Net Working Capital
₹272 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 46 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-4 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-147 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -0.33% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
375291———
Inventories(₹ Cr)
317299———
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
420350———
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
272240———
Working Capital / Sales(%)
11.9%13.2%———

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
44d48d———
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
60d58d———
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
51d60d———
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
67d70d———

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+3.5%————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-19.0%————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-10.7%+1.3%-4.3%-8.4%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-412-49-32-74
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-0.3%1.1%-4.6%-3.1%-7.3%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
73.8%64.3%84.8%76.2%160.0%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
0.1%0.0%———
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor8QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 68.77% unchanged across 8 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 16.89%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -1.32 ppDII -0.8 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +2.12 pp
FII+DII Net: -2.12 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (68.77%)
FII (1.59%)
DII (15.30%)
Public (14.34%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 68.77% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 8 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in balance sheet stress remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹500, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 26.9% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 26.9%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth26.9%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery20.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+6.9%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk47/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (29%)
Historical (20.0%)
Market (26.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing CARRARO for 26.9% long-term growth versus 20.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
7.3% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
32.4% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support3.60% (Moderate)
Sector Premium-16% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)26.9%20.0%Demanding
Operating Margin (EBIT)7.9%7.3%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion55.1%32.4%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
20%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weakening and momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
20%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions6 Sessions
Transition Probability10% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.6102σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualitySoftening
150 DMA Slope+0.3485%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹11.8 Cr91.81% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 8.2% (21D vs 200D Avg)Steady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹9.4 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.0893σ
Universe Rank
#1062 of 2259Top 47.01% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+0.34σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
CARRARO
STAGE 3 • TOPPING
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on CARRARO & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →