NESTLEIND
NSE↗BSE↗Large CapNIFTY 50
Nestle India Limited
FMCG›Food Products›Packaged Foods
Current Price₹1,168(-1.06%)
Market Cap₹2,25,227 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
0/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)0th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
No Active Flags
Valuations✗ Demanding
Expectation Gap-48.0%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure○ Topping
Stage 36 sessions

Improving fundamentals and stabilizing technical baseline. Base building process active. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Nestle India Limited (NESTLEIND)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
15 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q2 FY2027, Nestle India Limited reported a 20.6% YoY revenue expansion to ₹6,808.6 Cr, with EBITDA margins expanding +2.1 pp to 24.0%, supported by steady earnings momentum across recent interim quarters. This operational recovery is marked by stabilizing margin compression and easing capex efficiency stress, though historical working capital expansion and relative growth weakness persist. This operational trajectory remains anchored by balance sheet strength from FY2026, where an audited CFO/PAT ratio of 1.44x (₹5,047.6 Cr operating cash flow) and deleveraging (D/E of 0.0) comfortably absorb working capital requirements, maintaining the company within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (-0.07σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -10.8% this quarter (from ₹1,310 on 30 Sept to ₹1,168)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for NESTLEIND
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 0 ptsClean Profile (Zero Penalties)
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH100/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)48/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION48/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹1,168(-1.06%)
1M Divergence-6.53%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-4.57%-1.46%-3.11%
1 Month-13.22%-6.69%-6.53%
6 Months-19.92%+6.82%-26.75%
1 Year-7.61%+8.93%-16.53%
2 Year+4.47%+47.64%-43.17%
3 Year-0.05%+125.5%-125.55%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score0 / 100Riskier than 0% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in growth sustainability. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
No active forensic penalties contributing.
Final Composite Risk0 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has declined from 5 → 0 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Risk Drivers
Zero active risk triggers detected
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Working Capital Expansion (Q2-FY25)✓ Industrial Margin Stress (Q4-FY26)✓ Inventory Stress (Q4-FY25)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (8)Free Preview (2 of 8)

CriticalHigh
[M4]Industrial Margin Stress
Trend DeteriorationQuarterlyActive for 5 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
EBITDA MarginHigh Tier
20.9%↓ 379 bps
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline9-Qtr Median: 20.0%
Empirical Trigger

NESTLEIND: EBITDA margin compressed by 3.8 bps YoY.

Forensic Implication

Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
10.5%Sec 12.8%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineSec Median: 12.8%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (12.8%).

Forensic Implication

Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2026
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 8 Forensic Signals (6 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 8 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Nestle India Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Nestle India Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: FMCG (n=102 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:FMCG(n=102 peers)
Median Risk: 18/100Position: 0th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
11/100
6/100
21/100
BREAK
18/100
22/100
20/100
20/100
15/100
10/100
5/100
0/100
LATEST
5➔0/100
▼5-point improvement(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by overall risk reduction across core indicators.

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base5Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-5 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
-5Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal0-5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter0 Active Catalysts
✓
Pristine Baseline StabilityZero Forensic Anomalies or Alarms Fired in Q2 FY27
Clean State
New Alarms0
Net Delta-5 pts
Risk ClassLow Risk
↳Score improved from 5 to 0/100 as historical baseline stress decayed and fundamental balance sheet health was maintained.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q2 FY256 → 21 | +15 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+15.0 pts), driven by new Working Capital Expansion (+13.5 pts) and new Capex Efficiency Stress (+7.7 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 2 new risk signals emerged: Working Capital Expansion, Capex Efficiency Stress
•Revenue YoY: +0.8%
•Finding: Aggressive Capex (25.1%) amidst slow revenue ...
•PAT YoY: -0.9%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (18).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Nestle India Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
23.6%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
-2 Days
Growing↑
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.00x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹23,195 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025
Structural triggers
Revenue23,19520,260
growth % YoY+14.5%—
EBITDA5,4675,016
margin %23.6%24.8%
Net Profit3,4993,208
margin %15.1%15.8%
CFO5,0482,936
CFO / Net Profit1.44x0.92x
Debt24753
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·2 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
-2 days-17d YoY
Receivables:-2d
Inventory:-11d
Payables:+4d
Net Working Capital
₹-68 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 6 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-1,548 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-1,277 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -12.2% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
329363
Inventories(₹ Cr)
2,5692,850
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
2,9672,374
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
-68840
Working Capital / Sales(%)
-0.3%4.1%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
-2d15d
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
5d7d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
40d51d
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
47d43d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-23.8%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-24.3%—
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-6.4%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-1,548271
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-12.2%2.2%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
112.4%70.6%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
7.5%17.6%

Industry Intelligence

FMCG Sector KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current62.3%
QoQ Change+430 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+490 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median48.5%
Inventory Days
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current151 days
QoQ Change—
YoY Change-6.2%↓ Working capital speedup
Industry Median42 days

Understanding FMCG KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
Inventory Days: Average days inventory is held before sale. Lower indicates higher operational turnover. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 62.76% unchanged across 12 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 22.36%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +1.4 ppDII -1.23 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.17 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.17 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (62.76%)
FII (11.69%)
DII (10.67%)
Public (14.87%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 62.76% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in growth sustainability remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of core structural metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹1,168, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 28.0% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 28.0%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth28.0%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery15.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+13.0%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk91/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (30%)
Historical (15.0%)
Market (28.0%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing NESTLEIND for 28.0% long-term growth versus 15.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
15.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
20.5% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
53.2% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support1.87% (Moderate)
Sector Premium+142% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)28.0%15.0%Demanding
Operating Margin (EBIT)20.6%20.5%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion79.7%53.2%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
25%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weakening and momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
25%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions6 Sessions
Transition Probability8% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.9717σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualitySoftening
150 DMA Slope+0.2333%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹77.7 Cr53.51% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 1.0% (21D vs 200D Avg)Steady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹240.8 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.5168σ
Universe Rank
#1952 of 2259Bottom 13.59% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.07σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
NESTLEIND
STAGE 3 • TOPPING
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on NESTLEIND & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →