ALANSCOTT
BSE↗Micro Cap
ALAN SCOTT ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Financial Services›Holding Company
Current Price₹290.9(+0%)
Market Cap₹194 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
25/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)88th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverLow Interest Coverage
Valuations✗ Demanding
Implied ROE Gap-99.4%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✓ Strong
Stage 22 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure supports fundamentals, but capital flows remain weak.

SENTINEL REVIEW

ALAN SCOTT ENTERPRISES LIMITED (ALANSCOTT)•Updated yesterday

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is strong
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.33σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -7.6% this quarter (from ₹314.75 on 30 Sept to ₹290.9)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Low Interest Coverage and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 15.0 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH75/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)24/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE90/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION42/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹290.9(+0%)
1M Divergence+6.09%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-6.46%-1.68%-4.78%
1 Month-0.03%-6.12%+6.09%
6 Months+20.21%+2.84%+17.37%
1 Year-0.53%+28.06%-28.59%
2 Year+120.13%+14217.24%-14097.11%
3 Year+240.63%-2257.96%+2498.59%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score25 / 100Riskier than 88% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in balance sheet stress. This suggests the risk profile is currently stabilizing. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Balance Sheet Stress
+15.0 pts
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Final Composite Risk25 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 25 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Primary Deterioration Drivers
ESCUniversal Inventory Divergence
+1.2 pts
PERSISTENTOperating Leverage Stress
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Interest coverage ratio
  • Operating profit margins
  • Inventory turnover

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Liquidity & Coverage
■Low Interest Coverage
HIGHPersistent
Earning Quality
■Operating Leverage Stress
HIGHPersistent
■Universal Inventory Divergence
MODERATEPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ CFO-EBITDA Divergence (FY2026)✓ Profit Collapse (Q3-FY26)✓ Debt-Cash Flow Divergence (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Universal Inventory DivergenceMODERATE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (8)Free Preview (2 of 8)

CriticalHigh
[F15]Universal Inventory Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Inv DivergenceHigh Tier
+40.0 ppDSI +33.8%
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical BaselineStatutory Filing Baseline
Empirical Trigger

ALANSCOTT: Inventory growth outpaced Revenue growth by +40.0 pp (Inventory holding ratio increased +33.8%).

Forensic Implication

Slight build-up in inventory detected. Monitor for slowing sales momentum.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+14.5%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 5.0%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Margins are in freefall. Operating costs are growing significantly faster than revenue.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 8 Forensic Signals (6 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 8 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for ALAN SCOTT ENTERPRISES LIMITED.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for ALAN SCOTT ENTERPRISES LIMITED.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=0 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services
Position: 88th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
35/100
BREAK
30/100
25/100
LATEST
30➔25/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by overall risk reduction across core indicators, partially offset by Universal Inventory Divergence (+1.2 pts) and Low Interest Coverage (+1.0 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base30Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+2.22 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-7.2 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
-7.2Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal25-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
Escalated Stress (2 Flags)
+1.2 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·Escalated Risk
• Trigger:Inventory accumulated faster than sales throughput, signalling working capital lockup.
Revenue YoY:-1.3%
+1 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·Escalated Risk
• Trigger:Finance costs elevated relative to operating profit, narrowing interest coverage headroom.
Interest Coverage:-0.9x → 0.8x
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 15→Q1 FY27: 15
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 10→Q1 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q3 FY265 → 35 | +30 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+30.0 pts), driven by new Operating Leverage Stress (+9.6 pts) and new Profit Collapse (+5.4 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 2 new risk signals emerged: Operating Leverage Stress, Profit Collapse
•Universal Inventory Divergence Escalation: Contribution increased by +2.4 pts (severity unchanged at MODERATE)
•Low Interest Coverage Escalation: Contribution increased by +1.9 pts (severity unchanged at HIGH)
•Revenue YoY: +5.8%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (40).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for ALAN SCOTT ENTERPRISES LIMITED.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
-7.26%
Growing↑
Asset Quality (Gross NPA)
—
Stable↔
Provision Coverage (PCR)
—
Improving↑
Capital Adequacy (CRAR)
—
Weakening↓
Borrowings & Funding
₹10 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Interest Income——————
growth % YoY——————
Operating Profit (PPOP)0.721.94(0.05)(0.43)(0.66)n/m
margin %——————
PAT(4.30)(1.82)(3.50)(2.06)(0.07)n/m
margin %——————
AUM35.927.327.910.45.6+51%
Borrowings9.657.388.623.000.17+48%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 63.57% (+1.90 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding below 1% throughout
Q1 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q1 FY2027):FII +0.35 ppDII 0 ppPromoters +0.05 ppPublic -0.39 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.35 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q1 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (63.57%)
FII (0.35%)
DII (0.24%)
Public (35.85%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently improving. Recent structural triggers in balance sheet stress suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in core structural metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹291, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 100.0% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 100.0%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE100.0%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE-72.7%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap+172.7%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk90/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-75%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (102%)
Historical (-72.7%)
Market (100.0%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing ALANSCOTT for a 100.0% Return on Equity (implied from its 17.25x P/B) versus its -72.7% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear demanding. Valuation risk is High.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-72.7% CAGR
✗ Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
0/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak historical delivery
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium+1107% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)100.0% (Implied)-72.7% (Actual)Aggressive
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)17.25x1.69xHigh Premium
Return on Assets (ROA)-13.19%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Weak ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration, stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 2
STRONG UPTRENDBREAKOUT & MOMENTUM
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
86%
TrendAdvancing
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 2 advancing phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains constructive while momentum is accelerating. Current price action continues to support the prevailing advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✗Institutional flow has deteriorated
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure supports fundamentals, but capital flows remain weak.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
86%
Readiness LabelHigh (Phase Transition Imminent)
Regime Sessions2 Sessions
Transition Probability94% High
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.9579σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStrong
150 DMA Slope+2.5007%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
N/A
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
N/ASteady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0.1 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.0537σ
Universe Rank
#791 of 2259Top 35.02% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.33σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
ALANSCOTT
STAGE 2 • UPTREND
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on ALANSCOTT & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →