AIIL
NSE↗BSE↗Large Cap
Authum Investment & Infrastructure Limited
Financial Services›Finance›Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC)
Current Price₹494.05(+1.86%)
Market Cap₹41,956 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
16/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)65th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
StableQoQ Delta 0 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverNIM Compression
Valuations○ Balanced
Implied ROE Gap-28.6%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 172 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Authum Investment & Infrastructure Limited (AIIL)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, Authum Investment & Infrastructure Limited reported a 54.5% YoY deterioration in net profit to ₹1,929.3 Cr, compared with ₹4,241.4 Cr in the prior year. Despite this operating strain, the company maintains strong cash-backed profitability, with operating cash flows of ₹1,524.5 Cr and a CFO/PAT ratio of 0.79, indicating resilient liquidity capacity. The primary structural driver of earnings quality is severe NIM compression, with the net interest margin falling to 0.92% and persisting for 7 quarters. This pressure is compounded by a 380.5% YoY expansion in total debt to ₹3,335.6 Cr, reducing debt-to-equity to 0.23. While balance sheet integrity remains strong, the persistent NIM compression keeps the company under heightened operational surveillance within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: 0 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.40σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -9.6% this quarter (from ₹546.6 on 30 Sept to ₹494.05)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate NIM Compression and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 16.0 ptsEarnings Quality
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH84/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION40/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹494.05(+1.86%)
1M Divergence-3.76%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-5.31%-1.68%-3.63%
1 Month-9.89%-6.12%-3.76%
6 Months+4.72%+2.84%+1.88%
1 Year-17.75%+28.06%-45.81%
2 Year+51.96%+14217.24%-14165.27%
3 Year+196.8%-2257.96%+2454.76%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score16 / 100Riskier than 65% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend0 QoQ · StableNo change in risk score
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure has stabilized in profitability and earnings quality. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. No major change in risk trend.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+16.0 pts
Final Composite Risk16 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 16 over 13 quarters.

Expected Direction
STABLE
Ongoing Risk Drivers
PERSISTENTNIM Compression
0.0 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■NIM Compression
HIGHPersistent

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■NIM CompressionHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

NIM Compression is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (1)

CriticalHigh
[F6]NIM Compression
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 7 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
NIMHigh Tier
0.92%YOY_SEVERE
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline8-Qtr Median: 2.33%
Empirical Trigger

AIIL: NIM compressed by 257 bps YoY (to 0.92%). [Growth Adjusted: 36%]

Forensic Implication

NIM is under severe pressure due to rising cost of funds or falling asset yields.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Authum Investment & Infrastructure Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=255 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services(n=255 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 65th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
17/100
19/100
16/100
16/100
16/100
LATEST
16➔16/100
■0-point change(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk profile remained stable this quarter, with no new forensic alarms or critical threshold escalations detected.

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base16Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (0 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
0Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal160 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter0 Active Catalysts
✓
Pristine Baseline StabilityZero Forensic Anomalies or Alarms Fired in Q1 FY27
Clean State
New Alarms0
Net Delta0 pts
Risk ClassLow Risk
↳All 6 fundamental pillars operated within established safety parameters. No individual indicator transitions or severity shifts occurred during this period.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 16.5→Q1 FY27: 16.5
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Persistent Background Risk (1)
Indicators that remained active across both quarters at the same severity level with no net change.

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(3.6)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░36th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Authum Investment & Infrastructure Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
2.20%
Weakening↓
Asset Quality (Gross NPA)
—
Stable↔
Provision Coverage (PCR)
—
Weakening↓
Capital Adequacy (CRAR)
—
Weakening↓
Borrowings & Funding
₹3,336 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Structural triggers–––
Interest Income587471514
growth % YoY+24.7%−8.4%—
Operating Profit (PPOP)2,1174,0674,168
margin %360.6%863.4%810.7%
PAT1,9294,2414,285
margin %328.5%900.4%833.4%
AUM19,21116,08711,621
Borrowings3,336694637
Structural triggers first appear in FY2027 (ringed).

Asset Quality & Liquidity

Statement Disclosures·3 Fiscal Years

Gross NPA
—
PCR
—
—
CASA
—
CRAR
—
CD Ratio
—
NIM
2.20%
Asset Quality & Credit Risk
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Gross NPA———
Gross NPA (%)(%)———
Provisions64281-653
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)(%)———
Net NPA (%)(%)———
Credit Cost (% of Advances)(%)3.19%12.95%-42.97%
Liquidity, Funding & Balance Sheet
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Gross Loan Book (Advances)2,0082,1681,519
Total Customer Deposits———
CASA Ratio(%)———
Credit-to-Deposit (CD) Ratio(%)———
Net Interest Income (NII)388419449
Net Interest Margin (NIM)(%)2.20%3.02%3.86%
Capital Cushion & Solvency
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CRAR)(%)———
Net Worth / Equity14,76614,68910,345
Advances / Equity (Leverage)(x)0.1x0.1x0.1x
Forensic Divergences & Stress Signals
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Credit vs Deposit Growth (Δ)(pp)———
GNPA vs Provision Growth (Δ)(pp)———
Provision Burden on NII(%)16.50%67.00%-145.40%

* RBI mandates min. CRAR 11.5% (Basel III). PCR >70% robust. CASA >40% = strong franchise. CD Ratio >85% = liquidity strain.

Industry Intelligence

NBFC Sector KPIs
AUM Growth
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current17.7%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change—
Industry Median15.0%
Credit Cost
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current1.2%
QoQ Change+100 bps↑ Credit impairment rising
YoY Change+80 bps↑ Credit impairment rising
Industry Median1.1%

Understanding NBFC KPIs

AUM Growth: Assets Under Management YoY growth. Indicates loan book expansion pace. Learn More →
Credit Cost: Loan provisions divided by total advances. Measures credit risk cost. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor11QZero Pledge
Promoter holding down 5.91 pp across 11 quarters — requires monitoring
Promoter holding 68.81% (−5.91 pp across 11 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 14.59%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.1 ppDII +0.01 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.1 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.11 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (68.81%)
FII (14.38%)
DII (0.21%)
Public (16.60%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 11 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹494, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 17.7% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 17.7%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE17.7%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE14.2%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap+3.5%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk48/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (14.2%)
Market (17.7%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing AIIL for a 17.7% Return on Equity (implied from its 2.84x P/B) versus its 14.2% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear elevated. Valuation risk is Medium.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
14.2% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium+43% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)17.7% (Implied)14.2% (Actual)Achievable
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)2.84x1.69xHigh Premium
Return on Assets (ROA)9.26%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Strong ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
42%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains an early-stage base while momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✗Institutional flow has deteriorated
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market structure remains stable, but heavy distribution flows indicate institutional pressure.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
42%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions72 Sessions
Transition Probability12% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.5975σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityEarly Base
150 DMA Slope+1.7015%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹1 Cr23.67% Delivery (Day-Trading Heavy)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 59.3% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹34.9 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.1466σ
Universe Rank
#1178 of 2259Bottom 47.85% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.40σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
AIIL
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on AIIL & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →