Q2-FY27 Earnings Intelligence
AMRUTANJAN
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap🔵Founder / Family
Amrutanjan Health Care Limited
Healthcare›Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology›Pharmaceuticals
Current Price₹518.7(+1.05%)
Market Cap₹1,499 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated5 Nov 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
35/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)76th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
DeterioratingQoQ Delta +15 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverUniversal Inventory Divergence
Valuations○ Balanced
Implied Rev Gap+0.0%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 4109 sessions

High-quality business currently experiencing weak market structure. Monitor for trend reversal. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Amrutanjan Health Care Limited (AMRUTANJAN)•Updated today

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Amrutanjan Health Care Limited is experiencing structural strain, with a 13.9% YoY deterioration in reported net profit to ₹57.9 Cr and a 29.3% YoY contraction in operating cash flow to ₹36.0 Cr. This deterioration is compounded by severe margin compression, with EBITDA margins falling to 9.4% from 19.6% YoY, signaling significant cost-push pressure. The operating deterioration is driven by a receivables-revenue divergence, with receivable days rising to 35.8 and a 31.7% divergence in the latest quarter, indicating slowing collections. Additionally, a 10.2% YoY decline in operating cash flow is being exacerbated by a 5.6% operating leverage gap, suggesting structural profitability risks. Despite a nominal debt base, the company remains under active monitoring for working capital expansion and capex efficiency stress.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +15 pts)
  • ✗Profitability margins remain stressed
  • ✓Receivables-Revenue Divergence resolved this quarter (13 pts)
  • ✗New risk trigger: Inventory Stress (+18 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✗A/D flow regime is Neutral (0.08σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +0.8% this quarter (from ₹514.75 on 30 Sept to ₹518.7)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate Industrial Margin Stress and balance sheet impact
  • 🟢Receivables-Revenue Divergence resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 14.6 ptsBalance Sheet Stress
  • 10.0 ptsGrowth Sustainability
  • 10.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH65/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)49/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
A/D FLOW ACCUMULATION52/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: MODERATE × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹518.7(+1.05%)
1M Divergence+2.4%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+5.17%+2.9%+2.27%
1 Month-0.95%-3.36%+2.4%
6 Months-5.44%+6.04%-11.48%
1 Year-27.33%+11.85%-39.18%
2 Year-29.58%+45.28%-74.86%
3 Year-13.46%+126.19%-139.65%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score35 / 100Riskier than 76% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend+15 QoQ · DeterioratingRisk score deteriorated (+15 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (3 Qtrs)Deteriorating for 3 qtrs
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in balance sheet stress. This suggests a building risk profile. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Balance Sheet Stress
+14.6 pts
Growth Sustainability
+10.0 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+10.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk35 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 5 → 35 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
ESCALATING RISK
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWInventory Stress
+18 pts
NEWWorking Capital Expansion
+9.4 pts
ESCIndustrial Margin Stress
+1.2 pts
RESOLVEDReceivables-Revenue Divergence
-13 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Inventory turnover
  • Working capital efficiency
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■Universal Inventory Divergence
SEVEREAccelerating
■Industrial Margin Stress
HIGHAccelerating
Liquidity & Coverage
■Working Capital Expansion
SEVEREAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Receivables-Revenue Divergence (Q1-FY27)✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2026)✓ Operating Leverage Stress (Q1-FY27)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■Inventory StressHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

Asset turnover is slowing down due to inventory accumulation. This indicates potential channel stuffing or weaker demand in core product segments.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (9)Free Preview (2 of 9)

CriticalHigh
[M1]Inventory Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 2 Qtrs
Inv / RevHigh Tier
42.0%↑ 2 Qtrs
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineSec Growth: 20.6%
Empirical Trigger

Inventory growth (63.6%) significantly outpaced revenue growth (13.3%).

Forensic Implication

Stock is piling up in the warehouse. Inventory turnover is slowing down dangerously.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[F15]Universal Inventory Divergence
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Inv DivergenceHigh Tier
+50.3 ppDSI +44.4%
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineYoY Prior: +26.8 pp
Empirical Trigger

AMRUTANJAN: YoY Inventory growth (+63.6%) outpaced Revenue growth (+13.3%) by +50.3 pp (Inventory holding ratio increased +44.4%).

Forensic Implication

Slight build-up in inventory detected. Monitor for slowing sales momentum.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
🔒
⭐ Pro Forensic Intelligence

Unlock All 9 Forensic Signals (7 Additional Warnings Gated)

Free accounts preview the top 2 highest-impact warning signals. Upgrade to Flagium Pro to inspect all 9 active forensic detectors, multi-quarter duration streaks, and financial stress metrics for Amrutanjan Health Care Limited.

Unlock with Pro Free →🎁 3-Month Free Trial Available

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Amrutanjan Health Care Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Healthcare (n=166 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Healthcare(n=166 peers)
Median Risk: 18/100Position: 76th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
5/100
10/100
20/100
35/100
BREAKLATEST
20➔35/100
▲15-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Structural Break Quarter
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated materially (+15.0 pts), driven by new Inventory Stress (+18.0 pts) and new Working Capital Expansion (+9.4 pts), partially offset by Receivables-Revenue Divergence relief (-13.0 pts) and Operating Leverage Stress relief (-5.6 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base20Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+33.84 flags
➔
- Resolved-18.62 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-10.2 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+10 pts).
-0.2Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal35+15 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter6 Active Catalysts
New Stress (3 Flags)
+18 pts
Growth Sustainability·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Inventory accumulated faster than sales throughput, signalling working capital lockup.
Inventory YoY:+63.6%Revenue YoY:+13.3%
+9.4 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Accounts receivable outgrew top-line sales, extending cash conversion cycles.
Receivables YoY:+16.0%Revenue YoY:+13.3%
+5.2 pts
Balance Sheet Stress·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Inventory accumulated faster than sales throughput, signalling working capital lockup.
Inventory YoY:+63.6%Revenue YoY:+13.3%
Escalated Stress (1 Flag)
+1.2 pts
Growth Sustainability·SEVERE → HIGH
• Trigger:Operating margins contracted under input cost or overhead pressure, breaching threshold.
Operating Margin:7.6% → 16.7%Revenue YoY:+13.3%
Normalized & Resolved (2 Flags)
-13 pts
Earnings Quality·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Trade debtor collections accelerated, reducing receivables-to-revenue divergence.
Receivables YoY:+16.0%Revenue YoY:+13.3%
-5.6 pts
Growth Sustainability·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Revenue growth improved while operating-cost growth moderated, reducing operating leverage pressure.
Revenue YoY:+13.3%Op. Expenses YoY:+12.0%Operating Margin:7.6% → 16.7%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress+14.6 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 14.6
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality-9.7 pts
Q1 FY27: 9.7→Q2 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 10→Q2 FY27: 10
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

12Q Structural Regimes & Inflections

Deterministic macro trajectory milestones
STRUCTURAL BREAK — Q2 FY2720 → 35 | +15 pts

Risk deteriorated materially (+15.0 pts), driven by new Inventory Stress (+18.0 pts) and new Working Capital Expansion (+9.4 pts), partially offset by Receivables-Revenue Divergence relief (-13.0 pts) and Operating Leverage Stress relief (-5.6 pts).

Forensic Trajectory Shifts:
•New Forensic Triggers: 3 new risk signals emerged: Inventory Stress, Working Capital Expansion, Universal Inventory Divergence
•Industrial Margin Stress Escalation: Severity escalated from SEVERE to HIGH
•Inventory YoY: +63.6%
•Revenue YoY: +13.3%

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: HEALTHY
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(2.7)Weak★☆☆☆☆
█░░░░27th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(0)Weak★☆☆☆☆
░░░░░0th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (18).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Amrutanjan Health Care Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Standalone
Operating Margin (OPM)
16.2%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
19 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
Zero Debt
Stable↔
Revenue Trend
₹520 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Revenue520469438394421+10%
growth % YoY+10.8%+7.1%+11.2%−6.4%——
EBITDA84.475.968.258.994.9+13%
margin %16.2%16.2%15.6%15.0%22.5%—
Net Profit57.950.845.039.867.2+13%
margin %11.1%10.8%10.3%10.1%16.0%—
CFO36.050.927.919.253.2+23%
CFO / Net Profit0.62x1.00x0.62x0.48x0.79x—
Debt——————
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·8 Fiscal Years

Forensic Accounting Signals:Inventory–Revenue Divergence: +26.2 pp (Monitor inventory turnover & carrying costs)Operating Cash Realisation Lag: CFO covers only 41.5% of reported EBITDA
Cash Conversion Cycle
19 days+9d YoY
Receivables:0d
Inventory:+5d
Payables:-4d
Net Working Capital
₹27 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: 15 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹22 Cr
PAT − CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: ₹74 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Moderate Accruals
Accruals: 4.72% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
61564833————
Inventories(₹ Cr)
37272929————
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
71695647————
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
27142114————
Working Capital / Sales(%)
5.2%3.0%4.8%3.7%————

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
19d10d17d14d————
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
43d43d40d31d————
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
26d21d24d27d————
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
50d54d47d44d————

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-2.1%+9.4%+33.9%—————
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+26.2%-12.8%-10.9%—————
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+10.0%+7.7%-9.8%—————
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
220172114———
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
4.7%-0.0%4.7%5.7%————
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
41.5%73.6%45.1%35.8%58.7%———
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
————————

Industry Intelligence

Pharmaceutical Sector KPIs
Gross Margin
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current66.2%
QoQ Change-970 bps↓ Profitability contraction
YoY Change-1320 bps↓ Profitability contraction
Industry Median64.0%

Understanding Pharmaceutical KPIs

Gross Margin: Revenue minus cost of materials as % of revenue. Measures pricing power. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge🔵Founder / Family
Promoter holding down 4.07 pp across 12 quarters — requires monitoring
Promoter holding 46.52% (−4.07 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 10.37%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +1.03 ppDII -5.38 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic +4.36 pp
FII+DII Net: -4.35 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (46.52%)
FII (3.47%)
DII (6.90%)
Public (43.08%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Q2-FY27
Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

Q2-FY27 Results Published • Concall Ingestion Active

Flagium AI is monitoring regulatory exchange filings (NSE/BSE) for AMRUTANJAN's official conference call transcript. Executive themes and management tone will automatically appear once filed.

View Q2-FY27 Results →
Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains stable.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is elevated and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently deteriorating. Recent structural triggers in balance sheet stress suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in core structural metrics, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹519, the market expects this company to grow its revenue by 13.3% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 13.3%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Implied Revenue CAGR13.3%Future Growth Needed
Observed Revenue CAGR9.7%Actual Past Growth
Revenue Growth Gap+3.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk53/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (9.7%)
Market (13.3%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied Revenue Model, the market is pricing AMRUTANJAN for 13.3% implied revenue growth versus 9.7% observed 3Y revenue CAGR. Current expectations appear elevated, and trailing fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
9.7% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
15.2% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
11.5% Conv
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support-1.27% (Weak)
Sector Premium-26% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)13.3%9.7%Achievable
Operating Margin (EBIT)16.1%15.2%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion-21.8%11.5%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Institutional participation has also deteriorated, compounding the weak trend as momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✗A/D flow has deteriorated
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Institutional mark-up & trend continuation)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions109 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.6684σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-0.8698%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹1 Cr51.31% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 44.9% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹2.5 Cr
Liquidity Tier
Categorizes trading liquidity depth based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & A/D Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.0034σ
Universe Rank
#909 of 2265Top 40.13% in momentum strength
A/D Flow Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative volume-weighted A/D flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+0.08σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
AMRUTANJAN
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on AMRUTANJAN & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →