BAJFINANCE
NSE↗BSE↗Large CapNIFTY 50
Bajaj Finance Limited
Financial Services›Finance›Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC)
Current Price₹917.25(+0.58%)
Market Cap₹5,70,335 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
11/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)53rd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverNIM Compression
Valuations○ Balanced
Implied ROE Gap-16.0%Valuation Risk: Medium
Market Structure○ Topping
Stage 36 sessions

Improving fundamentals and stabilizing technical baseline. Base building process active. Valuations remain balanced and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟠MixedMarket context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Bajaj Finance Limited (BAJFINANCE)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
19 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q2 FY2027, Bajaj Finance Limited exhibits a resilient operational trajectory with revenue expanding 21.8% YoY to ₹24575.8 Cr and reported net profit moving to ₹6366.6 Cr from ₹4947.8 Cr in the prior year. This momentum is reinforced by EBITDA margins expanding +2.3 pp to 71.0%, reflecting sustained execution following a consistent performance in Q1 FY2027 (Revenue: ₹23166.4 Cr; PAT: ₹6080.6 Cr). This operational acceleration is anchored against an FY2026 balance sheet with total debt of ₹366579.7 Cr (D/E: 3.13), where a negative CFO/PAT ratio of -3.4 (₹-65789.8 Cr) remains structurally typical for its scaled lending operations. Despite persistent NIM compression at 9.82% over nine quarters, easing operating leverage stress and improved debt servicing metrics are abating structural friction, maintaining the company firmly within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗New risk trigger: NIM Compression (+9.6 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (-0.07σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -4.4% this quarter (from ₹959.4 on 30 Sept to ₹917.25)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 1 active forensic warning flag for structural stress
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 11.0 ptsEarnings Quality
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH89/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)50/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE40/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION48/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟡
Profile: STRONG × BALANCED VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹917.25(+0.58%)
1M Divergence-0.75%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-0.94%-1.68%+0.74%
1 Month-6.88%-6.12%-0.75%
6 Months-2.11%+2.84%-4.95%
1 Year-14.5%+28.06%-42.55%
2 Year+33.53%+14217.24%-14183.7%
3 Year+23.55%-2257.96%+2281.52%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score11 / 100Riskier than 53% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in profitability and earnings quality. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+11.0 pts
Final Composite Risk11 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has remained stable (10 → 11) over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWNIM Compression
+9.6 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■NIM Compression
MEDIUMPersistent
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Operating Leverage Stress (Q4-FY25)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■NIM CompressionMEDIUM
Forensic Analyst Insight

NIM Compression is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (2)

CriticalHigh
[F6]NIM Compression
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 9 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
NIMHigh Tier
9.82%ACCELERATION
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 10.16%
Empirical Trigger

BAJFINANCE: NIM decline is accelerating (86 bps drop vs prev -67 bps). [Growth Adjusted: 26%]

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin compression detected. Core interest income is being squeezed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Leverage GapHigh Tier
+4.7%Expense > Rev
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 32.7%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Operating efficiency is stabilizing. The rate of margin deterioration has slowed.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2025

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Bajaj Finance Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceLow
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=255 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services(n=255 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 53th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
10/100
Base
15/100
11/100
11/100
6/100
11/100
6/100
11/100
6/100
11/100
6/100
11/100
LATEST
6➔11/100
▲5-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new NIM Compression (+9.6 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base6Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+9.61 flag
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-3.6 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-1 pts).
-4.6Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal11+5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
New Stress (1 Flag)
+9.6 pts
Earnings Quality·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Net interest margin contracted under escalating liability borrowing costs relative to lending yields.
Revenue YoY:+21.8%PAT YoY:+28.7%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Earnings Quality+12 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 12
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(5.6)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░56th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Bajaj Finance Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
10.11%
Growing↑
Asset Quality (Gross NPA)
—
Stable↔
Provision Coverage (PCR)
—
Improving↑
Capital Adequacy (CRAR)
—
Weakening↓
Borrowings & Funding
728%
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers––––
Interest Income80,53067,14653,57441,39730,336+25%
growth % YoY+19.9%+25.3%+29.4%+36.5%——
Operating Profit (PPOP)26,06522,06219,30215,5269,504+19%
margin %32.4%32.9%36.0%37.5%31.3%—
PAT19,33216,77914,45111,5087,028+19%
margin %24.0%25.0%27.0%27.8%23.2%—
AUM559,952466,127375,742275,229—+27%
Borrowings366,580289,846233,195———
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Asset Quality & Liquidity

Statement Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Risk Signals
Credit–Deposit Imbalance: Loan book expanding +26.4 pp faster than deposit growthElevated CD Ratio: 728.0% indicates tight structural liquidity
Gross NPA
—
PCR
—
—
CASA
—
CRAR
—
CD Ratio
728.0%
Strain
NIM
10.11%
Asset Quality & Credit Risk
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross NPA——————————
Gross NPA (%)(%)——————————
Provisions9,4827,9664,631—4,8035,9693,929———
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)(%)——————————
Net NPA (%)(%)——————————
Credit Cost (% of Advances)(%)1.90%1.95%1.42%———————
Liquidity, Funding & Balance Sheet
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross Loan Book (Advances)4,98,9444,07,8443,26,293———————
Total Customer Deposits68,53371,40360,151———————
CASA Ratio(%)——————————
Credit-to-Deposit (CD) Ratio(%)728.00%571.20%542.50%———————
Net Interest Income (NII)51,86442,37634,84928,83720,58816,34216,088———
Net Interest Margin (NIM)(%)10.11%10.07%10.71%10.48%——12.95%-6.43%-6.32%-6.96%
Capital Cushion & Solvency
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CRAR)(%)——————————
Net Worth / Equity1,16,98698,93776,69554,372———19,69715,8489,600
Advances / Equity (Leverage)(x)4.3x4.1x4.3x———————
Forensic Divergences & Stress Signals
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Credit vs Deposit Growth (Δ)(pp)+26.4 pp+6.3 pp————————
GNPA vs Provision Growth (Δ)(pp)——————————
Provision Burden on NII(%)18.30%18.80%13.30%—23.30%36.50%24.40%———

* RBI mandates min. CRAR 11.5% (Basel III). PCR >70% robust. CASA >40% = strong franchise. CD Ratio >85% = liquidity strain.

Industry Intelligence

NBFC Sector KPIs
Cost of Funds
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current8.0%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change-60 bps↓ Funding costs easing
Industry Median7.2%
Credit Cost
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current1.4%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change-40 bps↓ Provisions pressure easing
Industry Median1.1%

Understanding NBFC KPIs

Cost of Funds: Average interest rate NBFC pays on borrowings. Lower supports wider margins. Learn More →
Credit Cost: Loan provisions divided by total advances. Measures credit risk cost. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 54.67% (−0.11 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 36.84%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.42 ppDII +0.65 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.18 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.23 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (54.67%)
FII (19.79%)
DII (17.05%)
Public (8.46%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

BALANCED EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹917, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 23.3% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 23.3%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth in line with the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear balanced relative to the business's track record, representing standard expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE23.3%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE20.4%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap+2.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk54/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (25%)
Historical (20.4%)
Market (23.3%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing BAJFINANCE for a 23.3% Return on Equity (implied from its 4.51x P/B) versus its 20.4% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear elevated. Valuation risk is Medium.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
20.4% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium+27% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeBalanced

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)23.3% (Implied)20.4% (Actual)Achievable
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)4.51x1.69xHigh Premium
Return on Assets (ROA)3.45%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Strong ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance broadly in line with the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 3
TOPPING OUTPROFIT TAKING
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
47%
TrendDistribution
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 3 distribution phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weakening and momentum is beginning to decay. Current price action does not yet confirm a decisive breakdown or a renewed advance.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟠Mixed

Market context is currently mixed, with conflicting price structure and flow signals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
47%
Readiness LabelModerate (Transition Potential Building)
Regime Sessions6 Sessions
Transition Probability31% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.9088σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityNeutral
150 DMA Slope+0.2123%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹301.8 Cr60.24% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 6.7% (21D vs 200D Avg)Steady Baseline Delivery
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹824 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.2694σ
Universe Rank
#1478 of 2259Bottom 34.57% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.07σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
BAJFINANCE
STAGE 3 • TOPPING
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on BAJFINANCE & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →