BHARTIHEXA
NSE↗BSE↗Large Cap
Bharti Hexacom Limited
Telecommunication›Telecom - Services›Telecom - Cellular & Fixed line services
Current Price₹1,665.4(-0.03%)
Market Cap₹83,270 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
13/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)38th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +8 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverGovernance Integrity Shock
Valuations✗ Demanding
Expectation Gap-41.4%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 111 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Bharti Hexacom Limited (BHARTIHEXA)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, Bharti Hexacom Limited reported a 16.0% YoY deterioration in reported net profit to ₹1733.2 Cr, compared with ₹1493.6 Cr in the prior year, while revenue grew by 9.7%. This operating strain is compounded by a 2.6% YoY contraction in operating cash flows to ₹4464.0 Cr, signaling intensifying margin compression and operational friction. Governance risk is elevated, with a director resignation triggering heightened monitoring, while earnings quality is stabilizing as reliance on non-operational items recedes. Coinciding with this cash flow contraction, total debt rose to ₹2694.3 Cr from a prior base, reducing interest coverage to 1.86x and keeping the company under heightened operational surveillance.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +8 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✓Relative Growth Weakness resolved this quarter (7.7 pts)
  • ✗New risk trigger: Governance Integrity Shock (+13 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (1.95σ)
  • ✓Share price is up +16.9% this quarter (from ₹1,424.5 on 30 Sept to ₹1,665.4)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Review 1 active forensic warning flag for structural stress
  • 🟢Relative Growth Weakness resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 13.0 ptsGovernance
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH87/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)48/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION99/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹1,665.4(-0.03%)
1M Divergence+23.17%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+2.22%-1.37%+3.59%
1 Month+16.75%-6.43%+23.17%
6 Months+9.75%+0.1%+9.65%
1 Year-9.81%-5.02%-4.79%
2 Year+14.45%+35.37%-20.93%
3 Year+93.94%+130.26%-36.32%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score13 / 100Riskier than 38% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+8 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+8 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (2 Qtrs)Deteriorating for 2 qtrs
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in governance. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Governance
+13.0 pts
Final Composite Risk13 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 10 → 13 over 14 quarters.

Expected Direction
ESCALATING RISK
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWGovernance Integrity Shock
+13 pts
RESOLVEDRelative Growth Weakness
-7.7 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Governance Signals
■Governance Integrity Shock
SEVEREAccelerating
Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Relative Growth Weakness (Q4-FY26)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Governance Signals
■Governance Integrity ShockSEVERE
Forensic Analyst Insight

Governance Integrity Shock is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (2)

CriticalHigh
[G2]Governance Integrity Shock
Governance SignalsQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
GovernanceHigh Tier
Accelerating Risk
Signal MomentumAccelerating
Historical BaselineSEBI Compliance Clean
Empirical Trigger

BHARTIHEXA: Key governance event detected: DIRECTOR_RESIGNATION.

Forensic Implication

Governance risk is elevated. Monitor board actions and promoter alignment.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q1 FY2027
[I3]Relative Growth Weakness
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 1 Qtr
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Rev GrowthHigh Tier
6.6%Sec 11.0%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineSec Median: 11.0%
Empirical Trigger

Revenue growth consistently lags behind sector median (11.0%).

Forensic Implication

Earnings quality is stabilizing. The reliance on non-operational items is receding.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Bharti Hexacom Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Telecommunication (n=22 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Telecommunication(n=22 peers)
Median Risk: 18/100Position: 38th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
13/100
LATEST
5➔13/100
▲8-point deterioration(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated notably (+8.0 pts), driven by new Governance Integrity Shock (+13.0 pts), partially offset by Relative Growth Weakness relief (-7.7 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base5Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress+131 flag
➔
- Resolved-7.71 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (+2.7 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
+2.7Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal13+8 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (1 Flag)
+13 pts
Governance·SEVERE Risk
• Trigger:Audit quality or leadership instability.
Revenue YoY:+11.8%PAT YoY:+23.2%
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-7.7 pts
Competitive Position·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Underlying risk metrics normalized below Flagium's systematic alert threshold.
Revenue YoY:+11.8%PAT YoY:+23.2%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position-7.7 pts
Q4 FY26: 7.7→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance+13 pts
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 13
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(3.5)Weak★★☆☆☆
██░░░35th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (18).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Bharti Hexacom Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Standalone
Operating Margin (OPM)
53.0%
Growing↑
Cash Conversion (CCC)
-57 Days
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.38x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹9,578 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024
Structural triggers––
Revenue9,5788,7307,338
growth % YoY+9.7%+19.0%—
EBITDA5,0814,5923,307
margin %53.0%52.6%45.1%
Net Profit1,7331,494504
margin %18.1%17.1%6.9%
CFO4,4644,5833,546
CFO / Net Profit2.58x3.07x7.03x
Debt2,6943,7804,835
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·3 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
-57 days+4d YoY
Receivables:-1d
Inventory:0d
Payables:-5d
Net Working Capital
₹-1,498 Cr
5-Year Average Cycle: -57 days
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹-2,731 Cr
PAT − CFO (Cash Surplus)
5Y Cum: ₹-8,862 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Clean (Cash Backed)
Accruals: -14.26% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
108108445
Inventories(₹ Cr)
000
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
1,6061,5861,485
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
-1,498-1,478-1,040
Working Capital / Sales(%)
-15.6%-16.9%-14.2%

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
-57d-61d-52d
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
4d5d22d
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
0d0d0d
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
61d66d74d

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2026FY2025FY2024
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-9.6%-94.6%—
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
-10.8%-15.0%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
-2,731-3,089-3,042
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
-14.3%-16.4%-16.4%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
194.1%287.1%289.2%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
5.4%3.4%2.3%

Industry Intelligence

Telecommunication KPIs
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current54.0%
QoQ Change+100 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
YoY Change+170 bps↑ Operating efficiency gains
Industry Median15.5%
Asset Turnover
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current0.13x
QoQ Change—→ Stable asset efficiency
YoY Change+8.3%↑ Asset efficiency accelerating
Industry Median1.15x

Understanding Telecommunication KPIs

EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Asset Turnover: Revenue generated per rupee of asset base. Measures asset efficiency. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor10QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 70.00% unchanged across 10 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 14.28%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.33 ppDII +0.39 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.05 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.06 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (70.00%)
FII (3.25%)
DII (11.03%)
Public (15.73%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 70.00% · Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 10 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in governance remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of structural transparency and audit trails confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹1,665, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 23.8% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 23.8%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth23.8%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery10.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+13.8%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk77/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (26%)
Historical (10.0%)
Market (23.8%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing BHARTIHEXA for 23.8% long-term growth versus 10.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide strong support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
10.0% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
19.7% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
149.6% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
75/100
HIGH CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides robust support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support3.65% (Moderate)
Sector Premium-15% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)23.8%10.0%Demanding
Operating Margin (EBIT)24.6%19.7%Demanding
Free Cash Flow Conversion125.4%149.6%Achievable

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides partial evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
51%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains an early-stage base while momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✓Long-term trend remains above the 150DMA
✓Long-term trend remains above the 200DMA
✓RS continues to lead the market
✗Institutional flow has deteriorated
✓Momentum remains positive
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
51%
Readiness LabelModerate (Transition Potential Building)
Regime Sessions11 Sessions
Transition Probability18% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.0977σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityStabilizing
150 DMA Slope-0.3990%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹12.4 Cr46.8% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +25.8% (21D vs 200D Avg)Expanding Accumulation Trend
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹28.2 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthImproving momentum strength
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
+0.4556σ
Universe Rank
#338 of 2259Top 14.96% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+1.95σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
BHARTIHEXA
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on BHARTIHEXA & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →