SUNSHINE
NSE↗BSE↗Small Cap
Sunshine Pictures Limited
Telecommunication›Entertainment
Current Price₹389.5(-2.66%)
Market Cap₹1,213 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
0/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)0th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
StableQoQ Delta 0 pts
Business🟢 Stable
No Active Flags
Valuations✗ Demanding
Expectation Gap-44.9%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure○ Improving
Stage 136 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

SENTINEL REVIEW

Sunshine Pictures Limited (SUNSHINE)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2025, Sunshine Pictures Limited reported a 35.8% YoY deterioration in net profit to ₹34.0 Cr, compared with ₹53.0 Cr in the prior year. Despite revenue contraction of 23.1%, operating cash flows of ₹28.0 Cr (CFO/PAT: 0.82) indicate cash-backed profitability, with the cash conversion deficit now easing after prior periods of strain. The operating deterioration is driven by an expanding operating leverage gap, with expenses outpacing sales and a 12.5% YoY decline in operating cash flows. Coinciding with this cash flow contraction, total debt rose to ₹11.0 Cr from a nominal base, maintaining a stable debt-to-equity ratio of 0.1. Temporary liquidity friction—reflected in the cash conversion deficit—remains contained, keeping Sunshine Pictures Limited within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: 0 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✓Market structure is neutral/stabilizing
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Accumulation (0.85σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -14.1% this quarter (from ₹453.65 on 30 Sept to ₹389.5)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for SUNSHINE
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 0 ptsClean Profile (Zero Penalties)
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH100/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)41/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE60/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION71/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹389.5(-2.66%)
1M Divergence-6.8%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-5.07%-1.37%-3.7%
1 Month-13.22%-6.43%-6.8%
6 MonthsN/A+0.1%N/A
1 YearN/A-5.02%N/A
2 Year-14.54%+35.37%-49.91%
3 Year-14.54%+130.26%-144.8%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score0 / 100Riskier than 0% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend0 QoQ · StableNo change in risk score
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure has stabilized in profitability and earnings quality. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. No major change in risk trend.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
No active forensic penalties contributing.
Final Composite Risk0 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has remained stable (0 → 0) over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
STABLE
Primary Risk Drivers
Zero active risk triggers detected
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ Cash Conversion Deficit (FY2026)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (1)

CriticalHigh
[F1]Cash Conversion Deficit
Earnings QualityAnnualActive for 1 Year
Framework: Statutory Annual
PATHigh Tier
₹34.0 CrOCF ₹28.0 Cr
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineStatutory Norm: CFO ≥ 80% PAT
Empirical Trigger

SUNSHINE: OCF below Net Profit in 3/3 recent years.

Forensic Implication

Cash conversion has normalized in the latest period. Operational cash flow is back in sync.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: FY2026

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for Sunshine Pictures Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Telecommunication (n=22 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Telecommunication(n=22 peers)
Median Risk: 18/100Position: 0th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
LATEST
0➔0/100
■0-point change(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk profile remained stable this quarter, with no new forensic alarms or critical threshold escalations detected.

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base0Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (0 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (0 pts).
0Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal00 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter0 Active Catalysts
✓
Pristine Baseline StabilityZero Forensic Anomalies or Alarms Fired in Q1 FY27
Clean State
New Alarms0
Net Delta0 pts
Risk ClassLow Risk
↳All 6 fundamental pillars operated within established safety parameters. No individual indicator transitions or severity shifts occurred during this period.
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Balance Sheet Stress—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Competitive Position—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Balance Sheet Stress(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company appears relatively stable compared to the Sector Mean (18).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for Sunshine Pictures Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Operating Margin (OPM)
49.5%
Weakening↓
Cash Conversion (CCC)
₹28 Cr
Weakening↓
Debt / Equity Ratio
0.10x
Improving↓
Revenue Trend
₹103 Cr
Weakening↓
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2025FY2024FY2023
Structural triggers–––
Revenue10313427
growth % YoY−23.1%+396.3%—
EBITDA51.074.04.0
margin %49.5%55.2%14.8%
Net Profit34.053.02.0
margin %33.0%39.6%7.4%
CFO28.032.0(5.0)
CFO / Net Profit0.82x0.60x-2.50x
Debt11.017.07.0
Structural triggers first appear in FY2026 (ringed).

Working Capital & Forensic Monitor

Operating Cycle Disclosures·3 Fiscal Years

Cash Conversion Cycle
—
Receivables:—
Inventory:—
Payables:—
Net Working Capital
—
Receivables + Inv − Payables
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence
₹6 Cr
PAT − CFO (Working Capital Drag)
5Y Cum: ₹34 Cr
Accrual Quality Monitor
Moderate Accruals
Accruals: 5.26% of Avg Assets

Working Capital Schedule (INR Cr)

Metric / RatioFY2025FY2024FY2023
Trade Receivables(₹ Cr)
———
Inventories(₹ Cr)
———
Trade Payables(₹ Cr)
———
Net Working Capital(₹ Cr)
———
Working Capital / Sales(%)
———

Cash Conversion & Operating Cycle (Days)

Metric / RatioFY2025FY2024FY2023
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(days)
———
Debtor Days (DSO)(days)
———
Inventory Days (DIO)(days)
———
Creditor Days (DPO)(days)
———

Forensic Accounting Monitor & Divergences

Metric / RatioFY2025FY2024FY2023
Receivable Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———
Inventory Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
———
Asset Growth vs Sales (Δ)(%)
+58.2%-247.6%—
Earnings-to-Cash Divergence (PAT - CFO)(₹ Cr)
6217
Accrual Ratio (Accruals / Avg Assets)(%)
5.3%30.9%17.9%
Operating Cash Realisation (CFO / EBITDA)(%)
58.3%47.1%-125.0%
Capitalisation Intensity (CWIP / Assets)(%)
———

Industry Intelligence

Telecommunication KPIs
EBITDA Margin
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current15.6%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change—
Industry Median15.5%

Understanding Telecommunication KPIs

EBITDA Margin: EBITDA divided by revenue. Core operational profitability metric. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor1QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 74.84% unchanged across 1 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 4.52%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (74.84%)
FII (2.31%)
DII (2.21%)
Public (20.64%)
Quarterly Progression
7 unchanged — Promoters 74.84% · FII / FPI 2.31% · DII (MFs/Ins) 2.21% · Government 0.00% · Public & Retail 20.64% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 1 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. The current structural trajectory supports a stable risk outlook.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹390, the market expects this company to grow its net profits by 35.6% every year for the next 5 years. If you think the company will grow faster than 35.6%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that growth assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied Growth35.6%Future Growth Needed
Historical Delivery-27.0%Actual Past Growth
Expectation Gap+62.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk83/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-29%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (38%)
Historical (-27.0%)
Market (35.6%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, the market is pricing SUNSHINE for 35.6% long-term growth versus -27.0% historical delivery. Current expectations appear demanding, and historical fundamentals provide moderate support.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
-27.0% CAGR
✗ Weak
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
37.4% Margin
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
-57.6% Conv
✓ Positive
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
50/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Weak historical delivery
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield Support1.90% (Moderate)
Sector Premium+25% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR CURRENT PRICE TO BE CORRECT?

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricRequired (To justify current price)Historical Delivery (Average)Fulfillment Assessment
Revenue Growth (CAGR)35.6%-27.0%Aggressive
Operating Margin (EBIT)46.6%37.4%Aggressive
Free Cash Flow Conversion47.9%-57.6%Aggressive

*Required metrics indicate the operating efficiency and revenue expansion parameters that must be sustained long-term to justify the current stock price.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued revenue acceleration and stronger profitability would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 1
BASE BUILDINGINSTITUTIONAL ACCUMULATION
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
5%
TrendAccumulation
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowDeteriorating
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 1 accumulation phase. Although institutional participation has weakened, trend quality remains an early-stage base while momentum is stabilizing. Current price action has not yet confirmed a breakout into an advancing trend.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
○Long-term trend vs 150DMA is unavailable
○Long-term trend vs 200DMA is unavailable
✓RS continues to lead the market
✗Institutional flow has deteriorated
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure is building support for stable fundamentals.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
5%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions36 Sessions
Transition Probability10% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.0000σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityEarly Base
150 DMA SlopeN/A
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹7.5 Cr52.94% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 58.8% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹0 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Illiquid (High Slippage Risk)
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.3764σ
Universe Rank
#1714 of 2259Bottom 24.13% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+0.85σ
7D Flow TrendDeteriorating
SUNSHINE
STAGE 1 • BASE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on SUNSHINE & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →