RECLTD
NSE↗BSE↗Large Cap
REC Limited
Financial Services›Finance›Financial Institution
Current Price₹290(+1.22%)
Market Cap₹76,364 Cr
Analysis WindowQ2 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
9/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)40th Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
Early DeteriorationQoQ Delta +5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
Primary DriverNIM Compression
Valuations✓ Conservative
Implied ROE Gap+259.0%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 445 sessions

High-quality business currently experiencing weak market structure. Monitor for trend reversal. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🔴DivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

REC Limited (RECLTD)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In FY2026, REC Limited maintains a stable earnings trajectory, with 2.7% YoY growth in reported net profit to ₹16,308.2 Cr, compared with ₹15,884.2 Cr in the prior year. Strong operating cash flows of ₹5,971.6 Cr, supported by a CFO/PAT ratio of 0.37, indicate cash-backed profitability, though historical monitoring signals around operating leverage and NIM compression are currently easing. Balance sheet integrity is robust, with D/E at 6.05 and total debt rising to ₹514,725.2 Cr from a nominal base. The operating leverage gap of 8.1% and NIM compression to 3.55% reflect structural strain, but these risks remain contained within Flagium’s stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✗Risk score deteriorated (QoQ change: +5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✗New risk trigger: NIM Compression (+13.2 pts)
  • ✓Growth expectations are conservative
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Distribution (-0.38σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -3.0% this quarter (from ₹299 on 30 Sept to ₹290)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🔴Investigate NIM Compression and balance sheet impact
  • 🟠Track earnings quality and working capital trends in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 6.7 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 2.3 ptsGrowth Sustainability
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH91/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)51/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION41/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟢
Profile: STRONG × ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹290(+1.22%)
1M Divergence+1.76%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-4.13%-1.68%-2.45%
1 Month-4.37%-6.12%+1.76%
6 Months-18.15%+2.84%-20.99%
1 Year-19.67%+28.06%-47.73%
2 Year-40.07%+14217.24%-14257.31%
3 Year+19.21%-2257.96%+2277.17%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score9 / 100Riskier than 40% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend+5 QoQ · Early DeteriorationRisk score deteriorated (+5 pts)
Stress MomentumRising (1 Qtr)Deteriorating for 1 qtr
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Weakness is detected in profitability and earnings quality. No immediate concerns are visible. Risk is increasing at a faster pace.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Earnings Quality
+6.7 pts
Growth Sustainability
+2.3 pts
Final Composite Risk9 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 9 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
WATCH
Primary Deterioration Drivers
NEWNIM Compression
+13.2 pts
NEWOperating Leverage Stress
+5.6 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Operating profit margins

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

Earning Quality
■NIM Compression
HIGHPersistent
■Operating Leverage Stress
MEDIUMPersistent

Primary Driver & Insights

Key Contributor
Earning Quality
■NIM CompressionHIGH
Forensic Analyst Insight

NIM Compression is currently the primary contributor to forensic pressure. Ongoing monitoring of cash generation and balance sheet quality is warranted in upcoming quarters.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (2)

CriticalHigh
[F6]NIM Compression
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
NIMHigh Tier
3.09%ACCELERATION
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 3.46%
Empirical Trigger

RECLTD: NIM decline is accelerating (39 bps drop vs prev -7 bps).

Forensic Implication

NIM is under severe pressure due to rising cost of funds or falling asset yields.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027
[O1]Operating Leverage Stress
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 3 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
Operating MarginHigh Tier
29.3%↓ 710 bps
Signal MomentumPersistent
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 36.0%
Empirical Trigger

Expenses are consistently growing faster than revenues, creating operational pressure.

Forensic Implication

Early signs of margin erosion. Input costs are beginning to eat into core profits.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q2 FY2027

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for REC Limited.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=255 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services(n=255 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 40th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
10/100
14/100
9/100
4/100
9/100
LATEST
4➔9/100
▲5-point deterioration(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk deteriorated moderately (+5.0 pts), driven by new NIM Compression (+13.2 pts) and new Operating Leverage Stress (+5.6 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base4Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress+18.82 flags
➔
- Resolved00 flags cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-0.8 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (-13 pts).
-13.8Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal9+5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter2 Active Catalysts
New Stress (2 Flags)
+13.2 pts
Earnings Quality·HIGH Risk
• Trigger:Significant drop in Net Interest Margin.
Revenue YoY:-1.0%PAT YoY:-21.2%
+5.6 pts
Growth Sustainability·MEDIUM Risk
• Trigger:Operating expense growth outpaced revenue growth, breaching operating leverage stress threshold.
Revenue YoY:-1.0%Op. Expenses YoY:+10.5%Operating Margin:36.4% → 29.3%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Earnings Quality+16.5 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 16.5
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability+5.6 pts
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 5.6
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(7.3)Good★★★★☆
████░73th %ile
Growth Sustainability(7.7)Good★★★★☆
████░77th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for REC Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
3.65%
Weakening↓
Asset Quality (Gross NPA)
—
Stable↔
Provision Coverage (PCR)
—
Improving↑
Capital Adequacy (CRAR)
—
Improving↑
Borrowings & Funding
₹5,14,725 Cr
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––––
Interest Income59,12555,49946,66739,13438,767+15%
growth % YoY+6.5%+18.9%+19.3%+0.9%——
Operating Profit (PPOP)20,78520,11717,96013,89812,442+14%
margin %35.2%36.2%38.5%35.5%32.1%—
PAT16,30815,88414,14511,16710,036+13%
margin %27.6%28.6%30.3%28.5%25.9%—
AUM640,158614,502548,191465,503—+11%
Borrowings514,725496,243445,568380,790—+11%
Structural triggers first appear in FY2027 (ringed).

Asset Quality & Liquidity

Statement Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Gross NPA
—
PCR
—
—
CASA
—
CRAR
—
CD Ratio
—
NIM
3.65%
Asset Quality & Credit Risk
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross NPA——————————
Gross NPA (%)(%)——————————
Provisions2311,022-1,3581423,4702,446919———
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)(%)——————————
Net NPA (%)(%)——————————
Credit Cost (% of Advances)(%)0.04%0.18%-0.27%0.03%——————
Liquidity, Funding & Balance Sheet
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross Loan Book (Advances)5,79,2435,59,0884,99,1924,22,084——————
Total Customer Deposits——————————
CASA Ratio(%)——————————
Credit-to-Deposit (CD) Ratio(%)——————————
Net Interest Income (NII)22,88721,36816,72015,40016,71613,30010,719———
Net Interest Margin (NIM)(%)3.65%3.68%3.30%3.31%——3.59%-5.78%-5.89%-6.45%
Capital Cushion & Solvency
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CRAR)(%)——————————
Net Worth / Equity85,05478,37669,35058,121———34,54632,58833,671
Advances / Equity (Leverage)(x)6.8x7.1x7.2x7.3x——————
Forensic Divergences & Stress Signals
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Credit vs Deposit Growth (Δ)(pp)——————————
GNPA vs Provision Growth (Δ)(pp)——————————
Provision Burden on NII(%)1.00%4.80%-8.10%0.90%20.80%18.40%8.60%———

* RBI mandates min. CRAR 11.5% (Basel III). PCR >70% robust. CASA >40% = strong franchise. CD Ratio >85% = liquidity strain.

Industry Intelligence

NBFC Sector KPIs
Cost of Funds
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current7.1%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change—→ Stable funding cost
Industry Median7.2%
Credit Cost
ⓘ
Q2 FY2027
Current0.2%
QoQ Change—
YoY Change+10 bps↑ Credit impairment rising
Industry Median1.1%

Understanding NBFC KPIs

Cost of Funds: Average interest rate NBFC pays on borrowings. Lower supports wider margins. Learn More →
Credit Cost: Loan provisions divided by total advances. Measures credit risk cost. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 52.63% unchanged across 12 quarters · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 33.33%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +1.02 ppDII -0.43 ppPromoters 0 ppPublic -0.59 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.59 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (52.63%)
FII (16.78%)
DII (16.55%)
Govt (0.05%)
Public (13.98%)
Quarterly Progression
4 unchanged — Promoters 52.63% · Government 0.05% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and stable.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in earnings quality remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of operational margins and profitability metrics confirm the absence of material structural stress. Strategic vigilance is advised as structural decay is accelerating.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹290, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 8.9% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 8.9%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE8.9%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE18.5%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap-9.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk11/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (18.5%)
Market (8.9%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing RECLTD for a 8.9% Return on Equity (implied from its 0.80x P/B) versus its 18.5% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear conservative. Valuation risk is Low.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
18.5% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Pressure
✗ Leverage Risk
Delivery Capacity Index
25/100
LOW CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides limited support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium-13% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)8.9% (Implied)18.5% (Actual)Achievable
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)0.80x1.69xDiscount / Par
Return on Assets (ROA)2.24%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Strong ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
5%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🔴Diverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
5%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions45 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.8876σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-1.5011%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹54.8 Cr45.07% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +12.0% (21D vs 200D Avg)Above-Average Accumulation
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹239.8 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.3415σ
Universe Rank
#1634 of 2259Bottom 27.67% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
-0.38σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
RECLTD
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on RECLTD & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →