SBILIFE
NSE↗BSE↗Large CapNIFTY 50
SBI Life Insurance Company Limited
Financial Services›Insurance›Life Insurance
Current Price₹1,666.7(+2.06%)
Market Cap₹1,67,199 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
10/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)43rd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassStable
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟢 Stable
No Active Flags
Valuations✗ Demanding
Implied ROE Gap-82.3%Valuation Risk: High
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 459 sessions

Institutional accumulation regime. Strong business quality combined with supportive market trend. Valuations remain demanding and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🔴DivergingPrice structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

SENTINEL REVIEW

SBI Life Insurance Company Limited (SBILIFE)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
9 Oct 2026

🛡️ Sound Structural Profile: In Q1 FY2027, SBI Life Insurance Company Limited demonstrates an operational inflection, delivering 18.8% YoY revenue growth to ₹46,350.3 Cr and a 22.0% YoY expansion in reported net profit to ₹724.9 Cr (up from ₹594.4 Cr in the prior-year period). EBITDA margins held steady at 1.6% (₹745.9 Cr), confirming that historical earnings quality pressures have abated in favor of consistent, cash-generating operational momentum. This quarterly performance is anchored by an unencumbered balance sheet from audited FY2026, characterized by zero debt obligations (total debt of ₹0.0 Cr, D/E of 0.0) and zero active forensic warning signals. The absence of balance sheet leverage and strong underwriting expansion ensure operating resilience, keeping the insurer firmly positioned within Flagium's stable surveillance range.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✓Flag F6 resolved this quarter (14.8 pts)
  • ✗Growth expectations are demanding
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✓Institutional flow regime is Strong Accumulation (1.17σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -1.8% this quarter (from ₹1,696.4 on 30 Sept to ₹1,666.7)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for SBILIFE
  • 🟢Flag F6 resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 10.0 ptsBaseline Risk Floor
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH90/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)43/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION79/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🔴
Profile: STRONG × DEMANDING VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹1,666.7(+2.06%)
1M Divergence+1.24%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week+0.34%-2.23%+2.57%
1 Month-3.55%-4.79%+1.24%
6 Months-8.37%-10.46%+2.09%
1 Year-13.83%-17.12%+3.29%
2 Year+4.13%-14.42%+18.55%
3 Year+28.57%+8.31%+20.27%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score10 / 100Riskier than 43% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Stable
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in governance. This indicates that forensic pressure is currently receding. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Macro & Sector Calibration+10.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk10 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 0 → 10 over 12 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Risk Relief & Attribution Drivers
RESOLVEDFlag F6
-14.8 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Sustainability of earnings recovery
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (0)

CriticalHigh

Zero Active Forensic Red Flags Detected

Flagium AI evaluated 14 automated forensic checks across governance, solvency, earnings quality, and cash conversion for SBI Life Insurance Company Limited. No active warning triggers were found in recent filings.

✓ 14 Forensic Checks PassedClean Forensic Profile

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

📁

No Active Red Flags Detected

This company currently has no flagged forensic anomalies requiring an evidentiary audit dossier.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=255 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services(n=255 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 43th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
0/100
Base
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
11/100
14/100
14/100
15/100
15/100
10/100
LATEST
15➔10/100
▼5-point improvement(Q1 FY27 ➔ Q2 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by NIM Compression (-14.8 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base15Q1 FY27
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved-14.81 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-0.2 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+10 pts).
+9.8Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal10-5 net · Q2 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-14.8 pts
Earnings Quality·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Underlying risk metrics normalized below Flagium's systematic alert threshold.
Revenue YoY:+8.2%PAT YoY:+11.0%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Competitive Position—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Earnings Quality-14.8 pts
Q1 FY27: 14.8→Q2 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0
Solvency—
Q1 FY27: 0→Q2 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Competitive Position(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Risk profile is broadly aligned with the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for SBI Life Insurance Company Limited.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Premium Revenue
₹1,10,478 Cr
Weakening↓
Operating Profitability
₹2,470 Cr
Growing↑
Solvency Margin (CAR)
—
Stable↔
Total AUM
—
Expanding↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY20233Y CAGR
Premium Income110,478115,412130,92680,639+11%
growth % YoY−4.3%−11.8%+62.4%——
Other Income—————
Profit2,4702,4131,8941,721+13%
margin %2.2%2.1%1.4%2.1%—
Solvency Ratio (%)—————
AUM500,046457,095398,277314,599+17%
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Ownership structure stable
Promoter holding 55.31% (−0.12 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 40.75%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII -0.27 ppDII +0.41 ppPromoters -0.01 ppPublic -0.12 pp
FII+DII Net: +0.14 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (55.31%)
FII (20.68%)
DII (20.07%)
Public (3.94%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.00% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The structural architecture is currently robust. Capital resilience buffers in governance remain well-maintained against forensic benchmarks. Systematic scans of structural transparency and audit trails confirm the absence of material structural stress. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

DEMANDING EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹1,667, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 62.3% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 62.3%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market expects future growth significantly above the company's historical delivery. Current market expectations appear demanding relative to the business's track record, resulting in higher expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE62.3%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE14.7%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap+47.6%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk95/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (64%)
Historical (14.7%)
Market (62.3%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing SBILIFE for a 62.3% Return on Equity (implied from its 8.14x P/B) versus its 14.7% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear demanding. Valuation risk is High.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
14.7% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓High implied growth
✓Expensive valuation regime
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium+378% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeDemanding

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)62.3% (Implied)14.7% (Actual)Aggressive
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)8.14x1.69xHigh Premium
Return on Assets (ROA)0.51%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Weak ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance well above the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
5%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🔴Diverging

Price structure remains weak despite stable underlying financial risk.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
5%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions59 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
1.0961σ Neutral
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-2.1694%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹117.6 Cr50.41% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▲ +17.2% (21D vs 200D Avg)Above-Average Accumulation
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹206.6 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Neutral

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.1070σ
Universe Rank
#1101 of 2259Top 48.74% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+1.17σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
SBILIFE
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on SBILIFE & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →