SBIN
NSE↗BSE↗Large CapNIFTY 50
State Bank of India
Financial Services›Banks›Public Sector Bank
Current Price₹956.8(+1.24%)
Market Cap₹8,83,185 Cr
Analysis WindowQ1 FY27
Last Updated28 Oct 2026
Flagium AI Risk Score
Risk Score measures the severity of detected structural financial risks using Flagium's quantitative risk framework. A lower score indicates fewer or less severe detected risks (0 = Minimal Risk, 100 = Severe Risk). Quarter-to-quarter changes reflect changes in the underlying risk signals, not investment recommendations.
29/ 100
Scale: 0 = Clean • 100 = Severe Risk (Lower is safer)93rd Percentile · Sector
Risk ClassWatch
Risk Trend
ImprovingQoQ Delta -5 pts
Business🟡 Watch
Primary DriverSolvency
Valuations✓ Conservative
Implied ROE Gap+20.7%Valuation Risk: Low
Market Structure✗ Weak
Stage 429 sessions

High-quality business currently experiencing weak market structure. Monitor for trend reversal. Valuations remain conservative and supported by current metrics.

Market Alignment🟡Partial ConfirmationMarket structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

SENTINEL REVIEW

State Bank of India (SBIN)•Updated yesterday

EXECUTIVE FORENSIC DIAGNOSIS
27 Sept 2026

🚨 Structural Deterioration Signature: In FY2026, State Bank of India reported a 7.4% YoY deterioration in net profit to ₹83,298.8 Cr, compared with ₹77,561.3 Cr in the prior year, amid intensifying margin compression and cash flow strain. Operating cash flows contracted by 21.4% YoY to ₹38,097.4 Cr, with CFO/PAT at 0.46, signaling structural liquidity pressure despite 27.2% YoY debt growth to ₹777,302.2 Cr. This operating deterioration is driven by NIM compression and CAR decay. Interest margins fell to 2.68%, reflecting sustained pressure on net interest income, while capital adequacy ratios are stabilizing but remain below regulatory thresholds. Coinciding with this cash flow contraction, total debt rose to ₹777,302.2 Cr from a nominal base, reducing interest coverage to 1.27x and keeping the company under heightened operational surveillance.

WHAT CHANGED THIS QUARTER
  • ✓Risk score improved (QoQ change: -5 pts)
  • ✓Profitability margins pressure eased
  • ✓CAR Decay resolved this quarter (24.3 pts)
  • ✓Growth expectations are conservative
  • ✗Market structure is declining (Stage 4)
  • ✗Institutional flow regime is Neutral (0.16σ)
  • ✗Share price is down -0.3% this quarter (from ₹959.5 on 30 Sept to ₹956.8)
DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST
  • 🟢No severe forensic red flags active for SBIN
  • 🟢CAR Decay resolved in latest filing; verify sustainability in next filing
  • 🟢Maintain routine quarterly surveillance; no governance escalation required
RISK CONTRIBUTORS
  • 15.0 ptsSolvency
  • 10.0 ptsEarnings Quality
  • 4.0 ptsMacro & Sector Calibration
NEED CLARIFICATION ON THIS QUARTER'S AUDIT?

Divergence Radar

BUSINESS STRENGTH71/100
VALUATION ATTRACTIVENESS (MARGIN OF SAFETY)50/100
MARKET TREND STRUCTURE15/100
INSTITUTIONAL FLOW ACCUMULATION54/100

Structural Matrix

Valuation
Business Quality
Attractive
Balanced
Demanding
Strong
Moderate
Weak
🟢
Profile: STRONG × ATTRACTIVE VALUATION

Risk vs Price Timeline
Visualizing the historical relationship between the structural risk score and stock price movement over time.

Loading Chart
Share Price
Risk Score (0-100)
Market Performance
₹956.8(+1.24%)
1M Divergence+3.69%
DurationPerf.Sector AvgDivergence
1 Week-0.64%-3.61%+2.97%
1 Month-0.54%-4.23%+3.69%
6 Months-8.84%-1.54%-7.29%
1 Year+4.71%+0.27%+4.44%
2 Year+25.45%+14.55%+10.9%
3 Year+80.04%+24.73%+55.3%

Business Analysis Methodology

Business analysis focuses on structural risk inside the company. Flagium monitors earnings quality, balance sheet strength, liquidity, governance, competitive position, and growth sustainability to identify areas where risk may be increasing or decreasing before it becomes obvious in reported results.

Flagium AI Risk Score29 / 100Riskier than 93% of Sector Peers
Risk Class
Watch
Risk Trend-5 QoQ · ImprovingRisk score improved (-5 pts)
Stress MomentumStable (0 Qtrs)Consecutive quarters worsening
Severe Risk Chance5%
Low / Manageable
Interpretation

Financial profile remains stable for now. Pressure is receding in solvency. This suggests the risk profile is currently stabilizing. Risk levels are improving.

Risk Score Composition

Absolute point contribution of each forensic risk driver to the final composite risk score.
Solvency
+15.0 pts
Earnings Quality
+10.0 pts
Macro & Sector Calibration+4.0 pts
(Baseline sector risk adjustment to prevent false alarms in volatile industries)
Final Composite Risk29 / 100

Investment Risk Thesis

Historical Trend

Current risk score has risen from 24 → 29 over 14 quarters.

Expected Direction
IMPROVING TRAJECTORY
Risk Relief & Attribution Drivers
RESOLVEDCAR Decay
-24.3 pts
What to Watch Next Quarter
  • Sustainability of earnings recovery
  • Operating cash flow sustainability
  • Working capital discipline

Risk Drivers (Active Warnings)

No active warnings detected.

Decaying / Resolved Signals (12Q Surveillance)
✓ CAR Decay (Q4-FY26)✓ NIM Compression (Q3-FY25)

Primary Driver & Insights

Key ContributorNone
Forensic Analyst Insight

Forensic risk profile is stable. No severe operating or financial anomalies are currently pressure-testing business resilience.

Advanced Business Analytics

Active Risk Objects (2)

CriticalHigh
[F10]CAR Decay
Solvency & LeverageQuarterlyActive for 12 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
CAR RatioHigh Tier
0.00%Floor 11.5%
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical BaselineRBI Floor: 11.5%
Empirical Trigger

SBIN: CAR (0.00%) at critical buffer level (v/s 11.5% floor).

Forensic Implication

Capital position is strengthening through fresh equity or higher profit retention.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q4 FY2026
[F6]NIM Compression
Earnings QualityQuarterlyActive for 4 Qtrs
Framework: XBRL Quarterly
NIMHigh Tier
2.68%TREND
Signal MomentumDecaying
Historical Baseline12-Qtr Median: 2.69%
Empirical Trigger

SBIN: NIM declining for 3 consecutive quarters.

Forensic Implication

Pressure on core margins is stabilizing. Monitor for sustained interest income recovery.

Statutory XBRLFiling Period: Q3 FY2025

Statutory Note: Forensic signals are algorithmic quantitative observations derived from publicly filed XBRL disclosures and do not constitute allegations of legal misconduct or investment recommendations.

Unlock Interactive Signal Evidence Dossier

Access complete multi-quarter financial evidence, 5-KPI snapshot strips, diagnostic hypotheses, and 1-page forensic PDF dossiers for State Bank of India.

Risk Trajectory
Historical 12-quarter risk trend (Q-11 to Q0) followed by a 2-quarter predictive funnel (Q+1, Q+2).
Loading Chart
Business Stability
Key indicators of structural risk, cash buffer capability, and risk progression.
Shock ResistanceHigh
Severe Risk ChanceLow
Financial StabilityHigh
Margin of SafetyHigh
Forensic Benchmark Context: Financial Services (n=255 peers)

Structural Risk Attribution

Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters. Deconstructs the score delta into new triggers, severity escalations, cross-pillar contagion overlays, and rules no longer triggered in the latest quarter.

Deterministic quarter-on-quarter causal decomposition grounded in statutory exchange filings.

Peer Benchmark:Financial Services(n=255 peers)
Median Risk: 10/100Position: 93th Percentile

Historical Trajectory (12Q)

Resilient · 0 Breaks
← Swipe older12Q window
36/100
Base
38/100
31/100
31/100
41/100
42/100
34/100
34/100
34/100
34/100
34/100
29/100
LATEST
34➔29/100
▼5-point improvement(Q4 FY26 ➔ Q1 FY27)
Auditable forensic risk attribution explaining why the Flagium AI Risk Score changed between quarters.
Executive Synthesis:

Risk improved moderately (-5.0 pts), driven by CAR Decay (-24.3 pts).

Reconciliation Bridge· Swipe ➔
Deterministic Statutory Flow
Base34Q4 FY26
➔
+ New Stress00 flags
➔
- Resolved-24.31 flag cleared
➔
Scaling & Drift
Net calibration combining economic pillar capacity ceiling (-9.7 pts) and temporal volatility dampening (+29 pts).
+19.3Pillar Cap & Drift
➔
Terminal29-5 net · Q1 FY27
What Changed This Quarter1 Active Catalysts
Normalized & Resolved (1 Flag)
-24.3 pts
Solvency·Below Risk Threshold
• Cause:Asset quality or regulatory capital ratios strengthened back within comfortable bounds.
GNPA Ratio:1.47%CAR Ratio:12.90%
Risk Pillar Changes
Net shift in risk score points contributed by each fundamental economic pillar between the two quarters.
6 Fundamental Pillars
Earnings Quality—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Governance—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Growth Sustainability—
Q4 FY26: 0→Q1 FY27: 0
Solvency-34 pts
Q4 FY26: 34→Q1 FY27: 0

Business Resilience & Benchmark Context

Overall: STRONG
Solvency(5.7)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░57th %ile
Governance(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile
Earnings Quality(6)Fair★★★☆☆
███░░60th %ile
Growth Sustainability(10)Excellent★★★★★
█████100th %ile

PEER COMPARISON MATRIX

Ranked surveillance & credit risk comparison against sector peers

Company displays higher risk profile compared to the Sector Mean (10).

* Peer comparison is based on risk signals, not valuation or returns.

Unlock 5-Year Forensic Divergence Cockpit

Access multi-year visual divergence charts (EBITDA vs CFO Cash Gap, Receivables Decoupling Spread, and Debt vs FCF Burn) for State Bank of India.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial SummaryAudited · Consolidated
Net Interest Margin (NIM)
2.56%
Weakening↓
Asset Quality (Gross NPA)
1.49%
Improving↓
Provision Coverage (PCR)
74.4%
Improving↑
Capital Adequacy (CRAR)
12.30%
Growing↑
Credit-Deposit Ratio
82.4%
Growing↑
Swipe for all periods ⇆
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY20223Y CAGR
Structural triggers–––
NII199,928189,994179,452(189,981)(156,194)n/m
growth % YoY+5.2%+5.9%————
Operating Profit (PPOP)——————
margin %——————
Net Profit83,29977,56167,08557,75037,183+13%
margin %41.7%40.8%37.4%-30.4%-23.8%—
Deposits6,043,0975,439,8984,966,5374,468,5364,087,411+11%
Advances4,978,0134,250,8313,784,273———
Structural triggers first appear in FY2025 (ringed).

Asset Quality & Liquidity

Statement Disclosures·10 Fiscal Years

Forensic Risk Signals
Capital Buffer Alert: CRAR at 12.30% — approaching regulatory comfort floor
Gross NPA
1.49%
-33 bps
PCR
74.4%
Robust
CASA
—
CRAR
12.30%
Above Floor
CD Ratio
82.4%
Moderate
NIM
2.56%
Asset Quality & Credit Risk
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross NPA73,45276,88084,276———————
Gross NPA (%)(%)1.49%1.82%2.24%———————
Provisions54,62257,21363,225———————
Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR)(%)74.40%74.40%75.00%———————
Net NPA (%)(%)0.38%0.47%0.56%———————
Credit Cost (% of Advances)(%)1.10%1.35%1.67%———————
Liquidity, Funding & Balance Sheet
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Gross Loan Book (Advances)49,78,01342,50,83137,84,273———————
Total Customer Deposits60,43,09754,39,89849,66,53744,68,53640,87,41137,15,33132,74,16129,40,54127,22,17825,99,811
CASA Ratio(%)——————————
Credit-to-Deposit (CD) Ratio(%)82.40%78.10%76.20%———————
Net Interest Income (NII)1,99,9281,89,9941,79,452———————
Net Interest Margin (NIM)(%)2.56%2.70%2.83%-3.36%-3.06%-3.45%-3.99%-4.15%-4.15%-4.58%
Capital Cushion & Solvency
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CRAR)(%)12.30%10.82%10.38%———————
Net Worth / Equity6,13,9765,04,1704,29,6653,58,9313,05,5882,75,5612,51,0602,34,4952,30,3212,17,192
Advances / Equity (Leverage)(x)8.1x8.4x8.8x———————
Forensic Divergences & Stress Signals
MetricFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020FY2019FY2018FY2017
Credit vs Deposit Growth (Δ)(pp)+6.0 pp+2.8 pp————————
GNPA vs Provision Growth (Δ)(pp)+0.1 pp+0.7 pp————————
Provision Burden on NII(%)27.30%30.10%35.20%———————

* RBI mandates min. CRAR 11.5% (Basel III). PCR >70% robust. CASA >40% = strong franchise. CD Ratio >85% = liquidity strain.

Industry Intelligence

Banking Sector KPIs
NIM
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current2.58%
QoQ Change+6 bps↑ Margin expansion
YoY Change+1 bps↑ Margin expansion
Industry Median3.4%
GNPA
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current1.47%
QoQ Change-2 bps↓ Asset quality improving
YoY Change-36 bps↓ Asset quality improving
Industry Median2.8%
PCR
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current74.20%
QoQ Change-16 bps↓ Lower provisioning buffer
YoY Change-29 bps↓ Lower provisioning buffer
Industry Median72.0%
NNPA
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current0.38%
QoQ Change—→ Stable net distress
YoY Change-9 bps↓ Balance sheet clean-up
Industry Median0.9%
Capital Adequacy (CAR)
ⓘ
Q1 FY2027
Current12.90%
QoQ Change+60 bps↑ Capital cushion strengthening
YoY Change+179 bps↑ Capital cushion strengthening
Industry Median16.5%

Understanding Banking KPIs

NIM: Net Interest Margin. Measures operational lending spread relative to total assets. Learn More →
GNPA: Gross Non-Performing Assets as % of advances. Measures overall loan stress. Learn More →
PCR: Provision Coverage Ratio. Measures bad loan provisioning coverage. Higher means stronger buffer. Learn More →
NNPA: Net Non-Performing Assets as % of advances. Represents actual bad loan threat after provisions. Learn More →
Capital Adequacy (CAR): Capital Adequacy Ratio. Measures a bank's capital as % of risk-weighted assets. RBI mandates minimum 11.5%; higher is safer. Learn More →
Shareholding Pattern & Pledging Monitor12QZero Pledge
Promoter holding down 2.04 pp across 12 quarters — requires monitoring
Promoter holding 55.45% (−2.04 pp across 12 quarters) · zero pledge or encumbrance · institutional holding 37.41%
Q2 FY2027 · latest disclosed quarter
Net Capital Flow (Q2 FY2027):FII +0.26 ppDII -0.3 ppPromoters -0.02 ppPublic +0.06 pp
FII+DII Net: -0.04 pp
Latest Ownership Distribution (Q2 FY2027)100.00%
Promoters (55.45%)
FII (11.07%)
DII (26.34%)
Govt (0.02%)
Public (7.12%)
Quarterly Progression
3 unchanged — Government 0.02% · Promoter Pledge (% Prom) 0.00% · Total Pledged (% Eq) 0.00% across 12 quarters

* Sourced from quarterly shareholding pattern disclosures filed under Regulation 31 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations. Pledged shares include encumbrances, non-disposal undertakings (NDU), and liens.

🎙️

Concall & Management Takeaways

Investor Earnings Call Transcripts & Tone Analysis

No investor earnings call transcripts transcribed for this scrip.

Earnings call intelligence is automatically populated when companies conduct quarterly earnings calls with institutional investors and publish transcripts.

Sentinel Forensic AssessmentALGORITHMIC RISK PROFILE • NON-ADVISORY
Fundamental Status

Business quality remains strong.

Forensic Pressure

Current forensic pressure is low and improving.

Primary Risk Vectors

Key risks remain concentrated in growth sustainability and operating leverage.

The risk profile is Early Signals and currently improving. Recent structural triggers in solvency suggest a building pressure on the underlying framework. Material forensic traces are visible in solvency ratios and structural leverage, indicating a progressive erosion of structural stability. Initial structural recovery is visible; monitor for a sustained return to resilience.

Market Expectation Engine

CONSERVATIVE EXPECTATIONS

Investor Translation • What the market price is expecting

Expectation Engine

At the current price of ₹957, the market expects this company to deliver an ROE of 13.6% every year. If you think the company will generate an ROE higher than 13.6%, current market prices reflect a discount relative to that assumption.

Sentinel Takeaway:The market currently expects future growth below the company's historical delivery record. Expectations appear conservative relative to the business's track record, resulting in lower expectation risk.

Market-Implied ROE13.6%Future Growth Needed
Actual Trailing ROE15.4%Actual Past Growth
ROE Expectation Gap-1.9%Growth Jump Needed
Expectation Risk41/100Price Risk Score
CONSERVATIVE (-7%)BALANCEDDEMANDING (22%)
Historical (15.4%)
Market (13.6%)
Valuation Summary

Using the Implied ROE Model, the market is pricing SBIN for a 13.6% Return on Equity (implied from its 1.44x P/B) versus its 15.4% actual trailing ROE. Current expectations appear balanced. Valuation risk is Low.

Business Delivery Capacity

Performance quality vs historical benchmarks
Historical Delivery Assessment
Revenue Growth SupportObserved CAGR vs cost of capital baseline
15.4% CAGR
✓ Achieved
Operating Profitability SupportEBIT margins compared to historical standards
N/A
✗ Weak Margin
Cash Flow Generation SupportOperating cash flow conversion and support cushion
N/A
✗ Negative
Capital Leverage RiskLeverage indicators and solvency pressure
Clean
✓ Clean
Delivery Capacity Index
45/100
MODERATE CAPACITY

Historical business performance currently provides moderate support for the market's implied growth assumptions. Improvement in revenue growth and operating efficiency would strengthen expectation support.

WHY IS EXPECTATION RISK ELEVATED?

Risk Drivers:
✓Weak profitability support
✓Weak cash generation support

Valuation Context

Historical Valuation59th percentile
Cash Yield SupportN/A (Weak)
Sector Premium-75% EV/EBITDA
Current Valuation RegimeConservative

VALUATION METRICS & QUALITY CHECK

MARKET REQUIRED METRICS
Assumption MetricCompany Current / ImpliedBenchmark / Sector MedianFulfillment Assessment
Return on Equity (ROE)13.6% (Implied)15.4% (Actual)Achievable
Price-to-Book (P/B Multiple)1.44x1.69xDiscount / Par
Return on Assets (ROA)1.03%1.00% (Healthy Standard)Moderate ROA

*Valuation parameters and asset quality checks represent key operational drivers of banking risk and institutional investment scoring.

Advanced Valuation Analytics
Sentinel Expectation Assessment

The current valuation assumes business performance below the company's historical record. Historical operating performance currently provides limited evidence that these expectations are sustainable. Continued stronger profitability and stronger cash generation would be required to justify current pricing.

Market Structure Methodology

Flagium separates Business Risk from Market Structure. Business analysis explains what is happening inside the company. Market Structure measures how investors are behaving through price trends, momentum, participation, and institutional activity. Divergences between the two often reveal important transitions before they become obvious.

Market Structure
STAGE 4
DOWNTRENDCAPITAL EROSION RISK
Stage Progress
Measures the progress of the stock's current price, volume, and momentum characteristic alignments.
0%
TrendDeclining
MomentumNeutral
ParticipationNeutral
A/D FlowImproving
Sentinel Market Insight

The stock remains in a confirmed Stage 4 declining phase. Although institutional participation has improved, trend quality remains weak and momentum continues to deteriorate. Current price action does not yet confirm a structural recovery.

What Is Driving Market Structure?

Market Drivers
✗Long-term trend remains below the 150DMA
✗Long-term trend remains below the 200DMA
✗RS continues to lag the market
✓Institutional flow has improved
✗Momentum remains negative
Summary
🟡Partial Confirmation

Market structure shows partial alignment with the underlying fundamental risk profile.

Market Cycle Stage Analysis

Stan Weinstein 4-Stage Cycle
S1
Base Building(Institutional accumulation & base building)
S2
Strong Uptrend(Ideal breakout & momentum zone)
S3
Topping Out(Institutional distribution & profit taking)
S4
Downtrend(Elevated capital erosion risk)
Stage Lifecycle
Stage Progress
0%
Readiness LabelLow (Early Base Consolidation)
Regime Sessions29 Sessions
Transition Probability0% Low
Measures the alignment and consistency of the stock's price trend relative to its historical volume volatility.
0.6450σ Weak
Trend & Strength
Trend QualityDeteriorating
150 DMA Slope-2.0266%
Participation & Volume
Total rupee value of shares actually delivered into buyers' Demat accounts today (excluding intraday trades). Delivery % indicates what portion of today's total trade was held as delivery rather than squared off intraday.
₹536.1 Cr50.88% Delivery (High Conviction)
Compares the 21-day average delivery turnover against the 200-day long-term baseline. Delivery expansion above baseline confirms a structural accumulation trend.
▼ 29.9% (21D vs 200D Avg)Delivery Volume Drying Up
Avg Turnover (200D)
The 200-day average daily traded turnover in ₹ Crore. Represents baseline trading depth and capacity to enter or exit positions with minimal slippage.
₹1,346.4 Cr
Liquidity Rating
Categorizes trading liquidity based on 200-day average turnover: Liquid (≥₹100 Cr/day), Low Liquidity (₹50–₹100 Cr/day), or Illiquid (<₹50 Cr/day) for sizing and slippage risk control.
Liquid
Participation
Evaluates current volume participation against historical baseline turnover. Healthy (≥1.2x) confirms active broad-market sponsorship, while Weak (<0.8x) indicates lack of volume conviction.
Weak

Momentum & Institutional Flow

Price Momentum
Momentum StrengthWeakening momentum trend
Price momentum score in standard deviations (σ). Readings beyond ±2.0σ indicate extreme momentum shifts.
-0.0584σ
Universe Rank
#983 of 2259Top 43.51% in momentum strength
Institutional Accumulation
21D Flow Score
21-day cumulative institutional flow score in standard deviations (σ).
+0.16σ
7D Flow TrendImproving
SBIN
STAGE 4 • DECLINE
—
C:—
Loading Market Structure Data...

Methodology & Regulatory Disclaimer

Flagium AI is an automated financial data analytics and research platform providing quantitative risk, forensic, and valuation analytics for informational and educational purposes only. Flagium AI is not registered with SEBI as a Research Analyst or Investment Adviser under SEBI regulations. These analytics do not constitute financial planning, investment advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before acting on any data presented.

📬 Flagium Risk Brief — Track forensic risks on SBIN & 3 market anomalies weekly

See a sample issue →